Trump wanted 90 days to sort out his immigration policy...

[OKTexas]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

Exactly what would be established, other than people who have no constitutional rights can't come for a bit longer?

.

 

[Hossfly]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

 

[BlackFlag]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

 

[OKTexas]

Immigration has been under the sole authority of the executive branch. If the Court finds otherwise it will have to rewrite substantial parts of the law.

Not only that, but they'll be overturning a lot of precedents.

.

 

[DarkFury]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

I want the border shut down for 90 until he CAN shut it down period and his office HAS that power.

 

[BlackFlag]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

Exactly what would be established, other than people who have no constitutional rights can't come for a bit longer?

.

That the government is issuing an order for no other reason that to not respect the establishment of Islam.

 

[DarkFury]

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

So what? Who cares if its a DIRECT action? He was elected to take DIRECT action.

 

[BlackFlag]

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

So what? Who cares if its a DIRECT action? He was elected to take DIRECT action.

And this was written to stop morons like Trump and his braindead followers: Constitution of the United States - We the People

 

[dcbl]

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

Weak

You are assuming intent that is not written into the order

And you have not connected dots to "establishment"

An establishment case would be about Muslims that are already here not being able to practice their religion

 

[DarkFury]

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

So what? Who cares if its a DIRECT action? He was elected to take DIRECT action.

And this was written to stop morons like Trump and his braindead followers: Constitution of the United States - We the People

Yeah but it was given to the office of the PRESIDENT to set immigration numbers from where.

 

[dcbl]

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

So what? Who cares if its a DIRECT action? He was elected to take DIRECT action.

And this was written to stop morons like Trump and his braindead followers: Constitution of the United States - We the People

You are approaching a legal question with emotion

 

[Hossfly]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

Laughable. What a waste of everybodies time.

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

Laughable. What a waste of everybodies time.

 

[Hossfly]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

Laughable. What a waste of everybodies time.

Agree, Trump's lawful EOs should have been left intact to start with

Good point baw

Except they weren't lawful. He fucked himself when he stated on the campaign trail that he was going to ban Muslims from the U.S. What part of "there shall be no religious test" do you not get?

 

[Pete7469]

Laughable. What a waste of everybodies time.

You're a waste of protein.

Keeping mooselimbs out of western civilization is a tactical and common sense approach to jihad.

Just like abortion was intended to keep pieces of shit like you from being born, everything has a potential to fail. So keeping them out isn't good enough.

 

[12icer]

Trump will be gone by Christmas. When Comey testifies next week before the Senate he's going to be popping Xanax and threatening all of his comrades with firing or worse. I LOVE IT.

How will that happen? tell us all how a President elected with a large majority of the EC will be removed from office by treasonous seditionist scum!! Next tell us when Trump has been investigated, and there is NO collusion, and NO obstruction of Justice, Then the investigation will continue to the "Leakers', and the persons behind their treasonous activity. Then they hopefully including their "ORGANIZER" need to be hung an buried in a trench filled with shit.

 

[DarkFury]

In short, although there is a uniform federal immigration law, and although the Supreme Court has declared unequivocally for over a century that the federal government has the exclusive power to make and enforce that law, the policies and practices of state and local governments throughout the country continue to shape the lived experience of the immigrants within their jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the letter of the law, federal immigration law is always mediated by powerful intervening forces at the state and local level.
Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

 

[OKTexas]

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

Only if they want to open a religious test can of worms, 1st amendment be damned. Maybe with Gorsuch, Trump will make America a puritanical monster again.

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

Exactly what would be established, other than people who have no constitutional rights can't come for a bit longer?

.

That the government is issuing an order for no other reason that to not respect the establishment of Islam.

Then why didn't it cover the other 90+% of islamic countries? If that was all it was for it doesn't seem to me it would be very effective.

.

 

[pismoe]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

The calendar is irrelevant at this time, it's all about the precedent. The supremes can't have the courts second guessing presidential security decisions. They will overturn the lower courts.

.

----------------------------------------------- hope so OKTexas !!

 

[jasonnfree]

So the court might hear the case in October. Maybe. That's way past the 90 days Trump said the government needed to "figure out what's going on." It will be over 300 days from Trump's order before the SC issues a decision. Is Trump so incompetent that he won't have "figured out what's going on" by then?

Laughable. What a waste of everybodies time.

Agree, Trump's lawful EOs should have been left intact to start with

Good point baw

Except they weren't lawful. He fucked himself when he stated on the campaign trail that he was going to ban Muslims from the U.S. What part of "there shall be no religious test" do you not get?

None citizens residing outside USA have no constitutional rights.

 

[OKTexas]

You damn fool, foreigners who have never set foot on US soil have no first amendment rights. No judge has the authority to confer them.

.

Hey what's that part of the 1st amendment that says there shall be no law respecting the establishment of.... hmmm.... could you tell me what that part says? Could you?

I've got a request for you, please connect the dots and explain how thus has anything to do with establishing a religion

It was an order meant as a direct, hostile action towards Islam. That's the whole point of everything. You need help "connecting the dots" on the entire foundation of this entire conversation?

So what? Who cares if its a DIRECT action? He was elected to take DIRECT action.

And this was written to stop morons like Trump and his braindead followers: Constitution of the United States - We the People

And pursuant to the Constitution the congress granted the president this authority.

(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President


Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.


8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens