Lakhota
Diamond Member
You provided the link, Fuck-nuts. I just clicked on it, read it, and pasted it into my response.He confessed, but DNA test weren't conclusive.I've already read up on the official record on this incident, and the NYTimes has nothing but a pack of lies to add to it.How can you say they were "guilty"?
In December 2002, an investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, Robert M. Morgenthau, found DNA and other evidence that the woman had been raped and beaten not by the five teenagers but by another man, Matias Reyes, a convicted rapist and murderer who had confessed to acting alone in the attack. Concluding that the new evidence could have changed the original verdict, Mr. Morgenthau’s office joined a defense motion asking that the convictions be vacated.
5 Exonerated in Central Park Jogger Case Agree to Settle Suit for $40 Million - The New York Times
Really? Even though another man confessed to the crime?
"Matias Reyes, a convicted rapist and murderer who had confessed to acting alone in the attack."
You guys want to paint Trump with the worst brush possible, so you'll believe a convicted criminal and an UN-convicted criminal (Hillary) any day.Preliminary DNA tests have shown that the man's genetic material is consistent with some of the evidence at the scene of the April 19, 1989, attack, a person familiar with the investigation said. But the tests do not show a conclusive match, the person added.
You have to go back 20, 30, 40 years to prove your point.....all the while you totally ignore everything Hillary is doing right now.
Link?
Really? Then why can't I find your quote in the New York Times article that I cited? Are you fibbing...again?
mudwhistle where are you?
Last edited: