Trump's people won't defend him

[Uncensored2008]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

And you Communist traitors want to corrupt our election with your farce of an impeachment.

America will punish you scum at the ballot box in 2020. All Americans need is 16 seats to flip to gain a majority in the house. I predict you Communists will lose north of 50 seats. We're also going to take Adam the lying Schitt out by running a Hispanic democrat in hist 92% Hispanic district. No, it won't flip GOP, but you fuckers will learn that this level of treason comes with consequences.

You have over-imbibed orangeade.

Whereas you're just a fucking moron.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hey dumbass, the Senate does NOT have to hold a trial. All it takes is for someone to propose a motion to dismiss. Only 51 votes will dismiss the trial before it gets started.

Although I think it's important to vindicate the president and to expose the deep, festering corruption of the Communist party in this affair. We all know the truth, the democrats did this for no reason other than to influence the 2020 election. They are again tampering in the American presidential elections. How long will we let the traitor fucks get away with it?

Get Eric Ciaramella under oath, expose his ties to Adam the lying Schitt, to Chuck Schumer, to Joe Biden, to Alexandra Chalupa, to KGB John Brennan. Lay the putrid and rotten corruption of the democrats out for the nation to see.

 

[fncceo]

then not one of them would vote to impeach

Doesn't that just tear you up inside?

 

[BULLDOG]

McConnell has to prevent any testimony in the impeachment trial, because Trump's people don't want to try to defend him in sworn testimony. It was easy for them to not appear before the house investigation because Trump didn't want them to testify, but he wants his people to stand up and vigorously defend him in the trial. Those potential witnesses are still afraid of being caught in lies, or not being energetic enough in their defense of Trump. It's just too much of a chance for them to take. McConnell has to either prevent everybody from testifying, or try to explain why Trump's people are a no show.

Nice try, a big hip hip hooray for you. We Americans, even assholes some of us don't like, EVEN they don't have to disprove a negative. Dems actually over reached big time here. Come on, millions of dollars spent on what amounts to a fishing expedition to depose a lawfully elected leader? And they did it in prime time in front of our eyes hours at a stretch. This isn't ambiguous/ subjective matter of a opinion stuff, its clear what the Dems where after.

I'm not sure how dislike of Trump justifies his unethical behavior. There is no question that what he did was wrong, but you seem to think that doesn't matter because everybody doesn't like him.

 

[BULLDOG]

McConnell has to prevent any testimony in the impeachment trial, because Trump's people don't want to try to defend him in sworn testimony. It was easy for them to not appear before the house investigation because Trump didn't want them to testify, but he wants his people to stand up and vigorously defend him in the trial. Those potential witnesses are still afraid of being caught in lies, or not being energetic enough in their defense of Trump. It's just too much of a chance for them to take. McConnell has to either prevent everybody from testifying, or try to explain why Trump's people are a no show.

Didn't you traitors have full control in the house to present any witnesses you wanted, yet still couldn't manage to present any fact witnesses and just stuck to defamation by Marxist academics?

So we have a faux impeachment, with no crimes or misdemeanors even alleged, put out for the specific purpose of influencing and altering the 2020 election. Gross abuse of power by the house Communists.

To compound it, Nancy Pelosi and her Communist party are violating the Constitution by refusing to move the process to the Senate, obstructing congress.

So these traitor democrats have abused power and obstructed Congress in order to rig the 2020 election.

You know Trump prevented the witness that were called, and refused to turn over the documentation that was subpoenaed.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

And you Communist traitors want to corrupt our election with your farce of an impeachment.

America will punish you scum at the ballot box in 2020. All Americans need is 16 seats to flip to gain a majority in the house. I predict you Communists will lose north of 50 seats. We're also going to take Adam the lying Schitt out by running a Hispanic democrat in hist 92% Hispanic district. No, it won't flip GOP, but you fuckers will learn that this level of treason comes with consequences.

You're an idiot. Calling people communists proves you are an idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

Argue for him? The situation is beyond ego. Democrats started it but they seem reluctant to go through with it. Nancy won't even face a friendly media.

With Trump, nothing is beyond his ego. Why do you think it is unreasonable for Pelosi to ask for a fair trial?

She never gave him fair treatment during the so-called impeachment inquiry. Why should anyone be reasonable with her wishes?

Bullshit.

 

[BULLDOG]

Witnesses are never called during jury deliberations.

Deliberations are later in the trial. You never watched a courtroom drama?

Hey Dummy:

The Senate is not a trial. They function as a Jury Deliberation. You told us you had “Overwhelming, Irrefutable, and Incontrovertible Evidence that was so Alarming that you had No Choice but to Impeach.”

I Dare you to deny that. Every Democrat said it, especially Nadler, Pelosi, and Schiff.

Honestly, I can only think that your leadership was so Ignorant of The Law, and so out of touch that this can be the only reason they committed political suicide like they did when they decided to engage in a Fool’s Errand.

All you LeftTards are on USMB, Trolling it like you just suffered a massive defeat and need to spin The Narrative.

Try to spin The Bloodbath that is coming in November, so we can laugh at you all over again.

Who told you that dumb ass? Yes, the Senate will hold a trial

Hey dumbass, the Senate does NOT have to hold a trial. All it takes is for someone to propose a motion to dismiss. Only 51 votes will dismiss the trial before it gets started.

Hold your breath for that to happen goober.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Witnesses are never called during jury deliberations.

Deliberations are later in the trial. You never watched a courtroom drama?

You just don't understand the process. You think it's like a courtroom drama. You thought that the democrat dog and pony show was like a grand jury proceeding where only the prosecution gets to give evidence. That's what you thought and you are wrong. The evidence is presented by the house. The senate is the jury, the trier of fact, and the chief justice is the judge.

We really need to start teaching civics again.

We never stopped. Libtards just slept through it.

 

[wamose]

This game is over. Democrats lost. So now you want to go best of three? After that it will be the best of five, then seven then nine. But we already know this is just a continuation of the coup that started with the crooked FBI and continues today. The only people these witnesses matter to are the mental patients that are still obsessed with the coup to overthrow Trump. The only thing that will come out of all these investigations are a lot of felony charges against the deep state. Viva Trump.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

Argue for him? The situation is beyond ego. Democrats started it but they seem reluctant to go through with it. Nancy won't even face a friendly media.

With Trump, nothing is beyond his ego. Why do you think it is unreasonable for Pelosi to ask for a fair trial?

She never gave him fair treatment during the so-called impeachment inquiry. Why should anyone be reasonable with her wishes?

Bullshit.

Just because you are stupid and disagree does not make it bullshit, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Witnesses are never called during jury deliberations.

Deliberations are later in the trial. You never watched a courtroom drama?

Hey Dummy:

The Senate is not a trial. They function as a Jury Deliberation. You told us you had “Overwhelming, Irrefutable, and Incontrovertible Evidence that was so Alarming that you had No Choice but to Impeach.”

I Dare you to deny that. Every Democrat said it, especially Nadler, Pelosi, and Schiff.

Honestly, I can only think that your leadership was so Ignorant of The Law, and so out of touch that this can be the only reason they committed political suicide like they did when they decided to engage in a Fool’s Errand.

All you LeftTards are on USMB, Trolling it like you just suffered a massive defeat and need to spin The Narrative.

Try to spin The Bloodbath that is coming in November, so we can laugh at you all over again.

Who told you that dumb ass? Yes, the Senate will hold a trial

Hey dumbass, the Senate does NOT have to hold a trial. All it takes is for someone to propose a motion to dismiss. Only 51 votes will dismiss the trial before it gets started.

Hold your breath for that to happen goober.

Yeah, Nasty will need a to grow a set of balls before she will send the Articles over to be laughed out of the Senate. I better not hold my breath!

 

[OKTexas]

McConnell has to prevent any testimony in the impeachment trial, because Trump's people don't want to try to defend him in sworn testimony. It was easy for them to not appear before the house investigation because Trump didn't want them to testify, but he wants his people to stand up and vigorously defend him in the trial. Those potential witnesses are still afraid of being caught in lies, or not being energetic enough in their defense of Trump. It's just too much of a chance for them to take. McConnell has to either prevent everybody from testifying, or try to explain why Trump's people are a no show.

Why would Trump call any witnesses, the Constitution say he must be accused of "high crimes or misdemeanors", he's not even accused of any crime. It's a no brainer acquittal.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Nevertheless, their testimony should be heard for the sake of the American people and history.

The house can call any of the witnesses they used to make their determination. The senate is not the place to extend the house investigation, that part is over and a vote was taken to proceed with what they have. Now they can dance with the one that brung'em. LMAO

.

 

[lennypartiv]

You know Trump prevented the witness that were called, and refused to turn over the documentation that was subpoenaed.

Trump, Mulvaney, and McGahn are not stupid enough to walk into a perjury trap.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

Argue for him? The situation is beyond ego. Democrats started it but they seem reluctant to go through with it. Nancy won't even face a friendly media.

With Trump, nothing is beyond his ego. Why do you think it is unreasonable for Pelosi to ask for a fair trial?

She never gave him fair treatment during the so-called impeachment inquiry. Why should anyone be reasonable with her wishes?

Bullshit.

Just because you are stupid and disagree does not make it bullshit, dumbass!

The fact that it is bullshit is what makes it bullshit.

 

[OKTexas]

No need for witnesses, just have the vote on day one.

Nah, let the commies present their non-case and ask for a summary judgment of acquittal. That may take 2-3 days.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

Argue for him? The situation is beyond ego. Democrats started it but they seem reluctant to go through with it. Nancy won't even face a friendly media.

With Trump, nothing is beyond his ego. Why do you think it is unreasonable for Pelosi to ask for a fair trial?

She'll get just as fair as she gave. That's justice.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Trump's people? You mean the people of the United States of America? The President doesn't need a defense. The burden of proof is on the do nothing democrat congress which seems reluctant to go through the procedure they started.

Trump wants people to argue for him. It's an ego thing.

Argue for him? The situation is beyond ego. Democrats started it but they seem reluctant to go through with it. Nancy won't even face a friendly media.

With Trump, nothing is beyond his ego. Why do you think it is unreasonable for Pelosi to ask for a fair trial?

Pelosi doesn't want a fair trial. She wants her kangaroo court rubber-stamped.

And so do you.

A fair trial in the Senate would be nice. Senators should honor their oaths to deliver impartial justice.

If Donald Trump had any evidence to defend himself he would have already presented it.

They will, they can't convict when no crime is alleged.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Why didn’t the Dimms call the the witnesses they want the Senate to call?

We have seen the testimony and Schiff’s report. What else needs to be done?

OP, who do you want to testify before the senate and why didn’t they testify before the house? Be specific. Names and reasons.

Jurors look at the evidence. They don’t call new witnesses.

Easy answer. The Witnesses they wanted, Rump declared Executive Privilege and barred them from testifying. The House did what it could with what was left. The problem is, if the House were to take it to court, it would have been at least 2 years of court battle, many millions of dollars before it could be resolved. And given the nixon days, those excluded witnesses would be compelled to testify but Rump could have tied it up for years in court. Another free ride for Rump.

So you're blaming Trump because the house was lazy and tried to take the easy way out? You're not very damn smart, are ya?

.