Trump's Tax Plan Will Pay for Itself

I didn't see anything about double-wides in that plan
What is it with liberals and mobile homes? You guys are hypocritical bigots of the first order. But to try and enlighten you vlad my boy it's the reduction of tax brackets that puts me into a better rate. this is long over due. Even democrats were pushing Obama to do this very thing to help the weak economy but Obama said no over and over again proving he likes it when people have less income. SUCKER.

How is are less fewer brackets good? The jumps are too big. People will keep incomes lower to avoid a huge increase in taxes.
The last thing any citizen should be hoping to do is pay more in taxes, because it will be just wasted
The Snob Mob Runs This Preppy Republic

Liberals are agents of the Right Wing they were born in. They purposely waste tax money in order to make the government look bad. That explains what has been going on since Camelot blazed and blinded, but it is forbidden to think so.
 
The Snob Mob Runs This Preppy Republic

Liberals are agents of the Right Wing they were born in. They purposely waste tax money in order to make the government look bad. That explains what has been going on since Camelot blazed and blinded, but it is forbidden to think so.

Mescaline extra potent this week?
 
The Snob Mob Runs This Preppy Republic

Liberals are agents of the Right Wing they were born in. They purposely waste tax money in order to make the government look bad. That explains what has been going on since Camelot blazed and blinded, but it is forbidden to think so.

Mescaline extra potent this week?
Giving the Thirsty Poison to Drink

You'll commit suicide with a drug overdose if you ever find out what clique of degenerates is selfishly manipulating you and filling you with self-hypnotic self-righteous snobbery.
 
President George W. Bush has the worst economic record of any president since Hoover. He holds the worst performance for GDP growth, stock market performance and job creation of any president of at least the most recent 11 presidents, and is near the bottom of the lists for all of the other measures below
No modern day president has had a sustained economic growth of under 1% like Obama had. If you are looking for the worst president in our nations history Obama is right near the top of that list. We are still clawing our way out of the economic mess he left behind. Maybe we should get some of that $400000 per speech the worthless one is getting from wall street bankers. Told you he was a hypocrite.
 
President George W. Bush has the worst economic record of any president since Hoover. He holds the worst performance for GDP growth, stock market performance and job creation of any president of at least the most recent 11 presidents, and is near the bottom of the lists for all of the other measures below
No modern day president has had a sustained economic growth of under 1% like Obama had. If you are looking for the worst president in our nations history Obama is right near the top of that list. We are still clawing our way out of the economic mess he left behind. Maybe we should get some of that $400000 per speech the worthless one is getting from wall street bankers. Told you he was a hypocrite.

Obama dragged us out of the republican mess. Bush was a disaster and he cut taxes.
 
President George W. Bush has the worst economic record of any president since Hoover. He holds the worst performance for GDP growth, stock market performance and job creation of any president of at least the most recent 11 presidents, and is near the bottom of the lists for all of the other measures below
No modern day president has had a sustained economic growth of under 1% like Obama had. If you are looking for the worst president in our nations history Obama is right near the top of that list. We are still clawing our way out of the economic mess he left behind. Maybe we should get some of that $400000 per speech the worthless one is getting from wall street bankers. Told you he was a hypocrite.

Obama dragged us out of the republican mess. Bush was a disaster and he cut taxes.
:badgrin: yeah we all were born yesterday
 
President George W. Bush has the worst economic record of any president since Hoover. He holds the worst performance for GDP growth, stock market performance and job creation of any president of at least the most recent 11 presidents, and is near the bottom of the lists for all of the other measures below
No modern day president has had a sustained economic growth of under 1% like Obama had. If you are looking for the worst president in our nations history Obama is right near the top of that list. We are still clawing our way out of the economic mess he left behind. Maybe we should get some of that $400000 per speech the worthless one is getting from wall street bankers. Told you he was a hypocrite.

Obama dragged us out of the republican mess. Bush was a disaster and he cut taxes.
:badgrin: yeah we all were born yesterday


Where President Obama turned the terrible economic hand he was dealt into a middling economic result, President George W. Bush turned a middling economic hand into a terrible economic result. His presidency was characterized by extreme fiscal irresponsibility at a time when there was no real economic rationale for it, by an escalation of trickle-down policies that sapped consumer spending and economic health, and by rampant deregulation that created dramatic economic risks.

Economic Record: President Bush Jr.
 
So you want the federal government in control of people's family life? Lol


Familyism is even more primitive than tribalism. You richlovers want their Masters' spawn to dominate the rest of us in the name of family values. You're so simple-minded that you think the aristocrats can do anything they want and that we peasants cannot use our government to put a check on their abuses. The pampered snobs selfishly claim they have a right to their Daddy's money, but you pathetic bootlickers make it look like a society based on birth and not worth is the natural order of things.
Well, I grew up with nothing on the Indian reservation; that did not have any influence on stopping me from making something out of my life.
Walking Tall by Walking All Over People on Your Way Up

How does getting it automatically mean you deserve your success? Status quo is static, not dynamic. Whatever is doesn't mean that's what it is supposed to be.

You became a bootlicking Buttboy for the Bosses. Why would the rich let anyone talented compete with their sons? You class-climbed the ladder built by them in a way to make sure you wouldn't give them any trouble. All you ever dreamed of is getting accepted into the Country Club, being patted on the head by the Preppies, and being told, "We forgive you for not being born rich."

Sacrifice has no merit; it is merely brownnosing. Most of all, you believe you have a right to set up your sons (and now daughters) halfway to the finish line instead of telling them to do it the way you did. Therefore, you aren't really proud of the way you did it and don't deserve any rational person's respect.
I certainly don't think the federal government has a right to disperse or redistribute wealth whatsoever.
The Wall Street Kremlin

By GUBMINT!! you Selfists mean the 99%, whose productive value is arbitrarily pre-distributed by the 1% to itself. But your clique owns the mind-control monopoly that intimidates people into believing that the GUBMINT!!! is some outside demon that oppresses all 100% of us, as if we were occupied by a foreign power.

But we,the people, not you the Plutes, own the entire playing field for the next generation and no one has the right to tilt it just because "it's his money." That doesn't allow him to do anything anti-social, which amounts to bribing the referees so his son's mediocre prep school team always wins.
Collectivism always appeals to the weak mind... a fact you just proved.
 
Tax cuts do not have to pay for themselves since they cost nothing to begin with

lol.

The COST of tax cuts is measured by the amount of revenue you lose that would otherwise be going to pay the bills.

It's like cutting your monthly credit card payment in half, without changing the amount you charge to your credit card.

no the cost of government is the amount of spending

if you never spend more than you make you never have a deficit do you?

it really isn't a difficult concept to understand

Politicians R or D will never stop spending as long as they have the credit card. Requiring them to tax to pay for what they spend is the only way to curb them.

no it's not the ONLY way

Yes it is because without that requirement you can never get enough politicians with the will
to do anything else.

I don't fall for false dichotomies as easily as you
 
President George W. Bush has the worst economic record of any president since Hoover. He holds the worst performance for GDP growth, stock market performance and job creation of any president of at least the most recent 11 presidents, and is near the bottom of the lists for all of the other measures below
No modern day president has had a sustained economic growth of under 1% like Obama had. If you are looking for the worst president in our nations history Obama is right near the top of that list. We are still clawing our way out of the economic mess he left behind. Maybe we should get some of that $400000 per speech the worthless one is getting from wall street bankers. Told you he was a hypocrite.

Obama dragged us out of the republican mess. Bush was a disaster and he cut taxes.
:badgrin: yeah we all were born yesterday


Where President Obama turned the terrible economic hand he was dealt into a middling economic result, President George W. Bush turned a middling economic hand into a terrible economic result. His presidency was characterized by extreme fiscal irresponsibility at a time when there was no real economic rationale for it, by an escalation of trickle-down policies that sapped consumer spending and economic health, and by rampant deregulation that created dramatic economic risks.

Economic Record: President Bush Jr.

The collapse of Indymac bank, the second largest bank failure in American history, began with a letter from the office of Senator Charles Schumer on June 27. He questioned the viability of the bank. When a senior senator who is in a number of influential posts regarding oversight of bank regulators directly attacks the confidence of a depository institution, it matters. Not surprisingly, the director of the Office of Thrift Supervision concluded that the collapse of the bank immediately following the Senator’s comments was not a coincidence. Director Reich concluded that Senator Schumer had ‘given the bank a heart attack’

Why? Why would a federal official with enormous power, destroy an institution on which tens of thousands of depositors (not all of whom are insured) and employees depend? Why would a New York Senator attack a Pasadena bank, acting as some sort of amateur, self-appointed, long-distance bank examiner?

Perhaps this might help answer the question: Indymac has been under attack from the hard left. The Center for Responsible Lending issued an attack on Indymac within a few days of Schumer’s letter. CRL is part of a small army of left of center ‘research’ groups, community organizers, and public interest law firms who make their living accusing home lenders of racial redlining and predatory lending. On June 20th the Center accused Indymac of unfair practices regarding minority borrowers.

A suspicious person might think that a network of lefty attack groups proficient in bank bashing and frequently funded by trial lawyers and short-sellers, coordinated their activities with a law firm on the hunt and a Senator who works closely with the network
If anyone handed Obama a bad economy it was Schumer and the democrats to hopefully blame Bush and get Obama elected. It worked with the help of gullible people and a willing media.

How Chuck Schumer Caused the Second Largest Bank Failure in US History
 
Tax cuts do not have to pay for themselves since they cost nothing to begin with

22% of GDP ...

... Ouch!
tax cuts do not cost anything

I can't make it any simpler than that

They might cost a lot. Look at the last tax cuts along with an expensive war. They cost jobs, they cost people's homes, they cost far too much.

the tax cut didn't cost anything.

the spending is responsible

A tax cut costs billions in borrowing.
no it doesn't

the borrowing is done to support SPENDING
 
Is anything else necessary? I mean bush was president and a disaster and you blame chuck for everything? Haha. Very funny.
Read the story, it is from CNBC. You can blame Bush for a lot of things but starting the banking collapse that robbed so many hard working people of their retirement and led to the recession Obama had to deal with is all on Schumer and the democrat party.
I was alive then you may be too young to remember but it's the truth. Just think how bad of a job the media does that that pig Schumer still serves in the Senate. Just fucking think of that for a moment.
 
Is anything else necessary? I mean bush was president and a disaster and you blame chuck for everything? Haha. Very funny.
Read the story, it is from CNBC. You can blame Bush for a lot of things but starting the banking collapse that robbed so many hard working people of their retirement and led to the recession Obama had to deal with is all on Schumer and the democrat party.
I was alive then you may be too young to remember but it's the truth. Just think how bad of a job the media does that that pig Schumer still serves in the Senate. Just fucking think of that for a moment.

Sorry but schumers words weren't the problem. Obviously it wasn't being run well. Funny you think a senators words are so powerful. Haha
 
Sorry but schumers words weren't the problem. Obviously it wasn't being run well. Funny you think a senators words are so powerful. Haha
Read the story laughing boy learn something for a change!
 
The real problem is that people earn far too little
No - the real problem is that people spend far too much and feel entitled to even more. Your absurd post here proves that.

When you have people protesting for a wage that exceeds their labor market value then you have a problem. Used to be if you wanted a higher wage you tried to find some way to increase your skills or value to an employer. It also used to be that people lived within their means and you didn't buy stuff you couldn't afford. I don't know when it happened but somewhere along the line we started demanding what we thought we deserved rather than what we earned.

Used to be if you wanted a higher wage you tried to find some way to increase your skills or value to an employer.

It used to be that wages grew with an increase in productivity and profits.
That was before the mass flood if illegal aliens.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

There are no market forces acting on wages any longer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top