Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Balance it?!? I want a surplus to pay off the debt. Let's start right now by cutting $1 trillion in illegal/unconstitutional socialist spending. Agreed?When did you stop wanting to balance the budget?
No?!? Yeah...didn't think so.
You hate the U.S. - you're not the least bit interested in doing anything for your country. You're only interested in bashing all things right-wing.
Republicans: cuts to the rich will benefit everyone!
Common sense: that's only if the weathly reinvest
Republicans: they will
Common sense: they won't
Donald trump: you can never be too greedy
What do you think business owners and the rich do with their money, genius? Mark Steyn points out that people like you think the rich put their gold coins in a warehouse and sit there all day moving it around with a bulldozer....vs . the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need......
the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need.....
Consumers are irrelevant. We can sell to anyone all over the world. Jobs are what matter. And corporations create jobs. We need to stop choking them.The working class are the consumers. We need to stop choking them.
Consumers are irrelevant
Yep...proof that he's a life-long libtard. But...he's also proposing significant cuts too. Something Barack Obama and the Dumbocrats never did.No, stupid, it doesn't. That's ignorant left-wing propaganda that you're actually dumb enough to buy into.Yes dummy it ABSOLUTELY HAS A COST
If we reduced taxes to a grand total of $1 but spent $0 - would there be a deficit? Cost, debt, deficit, etc. can only come from spending, you dimwit. Good grief, what grade did you drop out of school?!?
Trump has proposed trillions in new spending, dope.
If we reduced taxes to a grand total of $1 but spent $0 - would there be a deficit?
Why cant you fucking stupid liberals(I know redundant statement) ever consider a REDUCTION OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING? Oh yeah, I forgot.Tax cuts do not have to pay for themselves since they cost nothing to begin with
Again this retard line from a conservative.
Yes dummy it ABSOLUTELY HAS A COST: revenue reduction and increase in deficits and debt.
Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded. Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.
Republicans: cuts to the rich will benefit everyone!
Common sense: that's only if the weathly reinvest
Republicans: they will
Common sense: they won't
Donald trump: you can never be too greedy
What do you think business owners and the rich do with their money, genius? Mark Steyn points out that people like you think the rich put their gold coins in a warehouse and sit there all day moving it around with a bulldozer....vs . the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need......
It has been a give away since LBJ had his war on poverty and YES there has been Zero(0) return. At least when Clinton signed the contract with America that Newt created, shit fuck liberals could only stay on Welfare for 2 years then had to work. Thanks to Obummer, he stopped that shit, and made it Welfare for ever. Yep Obummer is the welfare president.Republicans: cuts to the rich will benefit everyone!
Common sense: that's only if the weathly reinvest
Republicans: they will
Common sense: they won't
Donald trump: you can never be too greedy
What do you think business owners and the rich do with their money, genius? Mark Steyn points out that people like you think the rich put their gold coins in a warehouse and sit there all day moving it around with a bulldozer....vs . the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need......
To get this through the reconciliation process, the tax cuts would have to sunset in two years, not ten.
Businesses won't plan or invest on that time frame.
It's a giveaway, for which we will see zero return ...
... and, you've been played again.
Rube.
War on poverty cost
The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288
1 in 4 large corporations pay zero in taxes. They're keeping what's ours.Uh...no. No, you are not right. It's not "welfare" to allow someone to keep what was already theirs to begin with.But hey those huge corporations need their welfare. Amirite?
I am sure that is way more than 1 in 4.1 in 4 large corporations pay zero in taxes. They're keeping what's ours.Uh...no. No, you are not right. It's not "welfare" to allow someone to keep what was already theirs to begin with.But hey those huge corporations need their welfare. Amirite?
So you've been believing that since Reagan?
Tax cuts create revenue, they don't decrease revenue......the explosion in businesses expanding and new businesses opening is going to be huge.......more jobs, more tax payers more money to the federal government.....
Republicans: cuts to the rich will benefit everyone!
Common sense: that's only if the weathly reinvest
Republicans: they will
Common sense: they won't
Donald trump: you can never be too greedy
What do you think business owners and the rich do with their money, genius? Mark Steyn points out that people like you think the rich put their gold coins in a warehouse and sit there all day moving it around with a bulldozer....vs . the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need......the reality where they expand their business, open new ones and create new and unique products that we want and need.....
Only if there is demand to do so.
Demand comes from people lining up with cash in hand to buy from you.
The smart growth play is to put the cash in the hands of the consumers rather than the producers.
Oh they don't make enough moneyThat's not "yours". You're not entitled to it. If they aren't paying any taxes - there is a reason for it. They don't make enough money. Or they have enough deductions. Or they conduct business overseas. The list goes on and on. If the IRS didn't bring them down (and they would) then those "1-in-4 corporations" are completely compliant with the U.S. tax code, snowflake.1 in 4 large corporations pay zero in taxes. They're keeping what's ours.
So why are people making minimum wage paying their fair share in taxes? They barely make a living wage.
Just by my first glance at this bill, I'm going to be able to pocket an extra 11,000 dollars next year! WHOOOOO HOOOOOO GO TRUMP! YES! YES! YES!
I'm struggling with it because it's wrong. They don't make enough money. Corporations bringing in millions and receiving the highest tax breaks while a single mom working for 9$ an hour is paying taxes out of her 250 checks. It's not right.Because they make enough money according to the U.S. tax code. This is not difficult - why are you struggling with it so much?Oh they don't make enough moneyThat's not "yours". You're not entitled to it. If they aren't paying any taxes - there is a reason for it. They don't make enough money. Or they have enough deductions. Or they conduct business overseas. The list goes on and on. If the IRS didn't bring them down (and they would) then those "1-in-4 corporations" are completely compliant with the U.S. tax code, snowflake.1 in 4 large corporations pay zero in taxes. They're keeping what's ours.
So why are people making minimum wage paying their fair share in taxes? They barely make a living wage.
Those corporations are fully compliant or the IRS would take them down. That's an indisputable fact.
The only tax reform I can support is one that closes loopholes, makes the 1% responsible for their fair share, and lessens the burden on the working class. Trump can't do that so I can't support him.No shitface, it was never theirs to begin with, it was ours. remember how you tell us that corporations charge us for their taxes, and that we pay them?Uh...no. No, you are not right. It's not "welfare" to allow someone to keep what was already theirs to begin with.
This is BS, corporation profits is theirs not ours. You are correct though that their taxes are part of the costs of doing business and are reflected in the price of their goods and services. Which means lowering their taxes results in lower prices for us and that means our standard of living is higher and that means the economy grows more and creates more jobs.
This is BS, corporation profits is theirs not ours. You are correct though that their taxes are part of the costs of doing business
So are taxes theirs or are they a part of doing business?? Which is it
The money they use to pay their taxes comes from their revenues; it is their money that we gave them in return for their goods and services. And taxes are indeed an expense of doing business.
They didn't lose sight of anything. They wanted to give tax breaks to the 1%.I can afford to be amused about the Trump tax reduction, since it is DOA, anyway. Not only does it dramatically increase the deficit, it does not even lower the taxes on the middle class, which was about 50% of the reason for tax reform. Meantime, it decreases tax for the rich. The part that is most amusing is the elimination of deductions on state and local taxes. Put another way, if I spend $1,000 on my property tax, I will have to spend another $250 on federal taxes on that $1,000 that I wasn't even able to keep. Then, there is the part about lowering corporate taxes, in order to create jobs. That would make sense if corporations were taxed on gross revenues. Somehow, the geniuses that wrote this thing seem to have lost sight of the the fact that only corporation net profits are taxed. Consequently, the higher the corporate tax rate, the more incentive the corporation has to invest money into R&D and business expansion, which is all deductible.
