Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

He has said where it didn't come from.

The Russians.
And squealing on the Russians has never come back to bite anyone on the ass, has it.

You want a conspiracy to assassinate people? Look at the Russians.
 
Assange knows where the data came from. He’s afraid to say it.
and does that make the data wrong?

im not going to get into a screaming match with someone who from all signs so far indicate they simply scream a lot and call people names when they disagree, pulling the RUSSIA card when all else fails.

in any reputiable dictionary, that's a troll.
 
Because a lot of people buy the propaganda and don’t engage in critical thinking

I'm going off topic here and this has been covered endlessly but.......critical thinking.......

A candidate that loses Michigan and Wisconsin to Sanders and then loses both to Trump is the best the Democrats had to offer? (both states the Democrats should have easily won)
 
And squealing on the Russians has never come back to bite anyone on the ass, has it.

You want a conspiracy to assassinate people? Look at the Russians.

As far as I know, Assange has never lied to us...........The Democrats? All the time.
 
and does that make the data wrong?

im not going to get into a screaming match with someone who from all signs so far indicate they simply scream a lot and call people names when they disagree, pulling the RUSSIA card when all else fails.

in any reputiable dictionary, that's a troll.
Playing the “Russia card” doesn’t make me wrong.
 
Oh no!!!! Russia!
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
it is so damn old it's not even a valid "maybe" anymore. all the RUSSIA crap has been proven to be a clinton game and those pushing it simply don't care. keep pushing the turd around. when they double down and act like THEY know facts and then scream YOU RUSSIAN TOOL! you know continued conversation is a total and complete waste of time.
 
I'm going off topic here and this has been covered endlessly but.......critical thinking.......

A candidate that loses Michigan and Wisconsin to Sanders and then loses both to Trump is the best the Democrats had to offer? (both states the Democrats should have easily won)
They weren’t going to win with a socialist in Michigan and Wisconsin.
 
You’ll make excuse for them because they’re on your side.

The Seth Rich conspiracy was fabricated by Russians to cover their asses
Bullshit. Russia has been the fall guy for every rotten trick the Democrats ( America hating assholes) have pulled. The hoax has been exposed. Again, you are an idiot.
 
since the entire RUSSIA narrative has been blown out of the water, yes it does.

have a nice day trolling.
Don’t tell me you believe the Seth Rich conspiracy too?

It was a Russian hack. Nothing has been blown out of the water.
 
What was “exposed” was the DNC doing what the DNC is supposed to do. Try to win elections.
now if only they'd try within the confines of the rules. esp when they hold OTHERS to said rules.

RUSSIA my dimpled ass.
 
They weren’t going to win with a socialist in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Sanders won in Michigan and Wisconsin over Hillary. Trump barely squeaked wins there, Yes Sanders would have won those states.

Argue otherwise but we do know who didn't win them.
 
Sanders won in Michigan and Wisconsin over Hillary. Trump barely squeaked wins there, Yes Sanders would have won those states.

Argue otherwise but we do know who didn't win them.
Moderates in those states determined the outcome. Sanders doesn’t appeal to moderates.

Either way, the DNC is supposed to work to win elections. Argue the outcome if you want, but that’s all they were doing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top