Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,968
- 17,023
- 2,190
Haha, no. That’s not how the program is designed operate. Educate yourselfWho decides what is disinfo and that it can't be said? That stupid bitch he apptd?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, no. That’s not how the program is designed operate. Educate yourselfWho decides what is disinfo and that it can't be said? That stupid bitch he apptd?
Haha, no. That’s not how the program is designed operate. Educate yourself
The CIA and FBI already monitor specific threats. This new "Board" is designed to monitor all information, internal or external, and take action based on their interpretation of the speech. This is way beyond monitoring communications between known terrorists. They have virtually no oversight.Trump admin started the same kind of agency to monitor cyber communications as Russia had an active disinformation campaign against our country. As much as it sounds like you support the “thumb up the ass” policy, I’d prefer our security agencies stay on top of this kind of stuff. All for this other jumbo jumbo I see people claiming, such as they will control our social media accounts… well that’s unfounded hyperpartisan BS.
Sorry bout that,How exactly is this group preventing free speech?
I consider anything you post as a waste of time.Only a true hack would consider researching source materials a waste of time.
The government is not supposed to interfere with free speech. Having the government determine what is true or false can interfere with free speech. Plus our wonderful government lies to us all the time.Doesn’t anybody have the constitutional right to label anything anything they want? And don’t news companies have the constitutional right to report what they chose to report?
Sounds familiar...where have I heard something like this before?Sure this is what the group will be tasked to do…
The new board is intended to standardize the department's efforts to respond to disinformation that could be connected with violent threats to the U.S. So, if an agency under DHS — like Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency (CISA) — identifies disinformation under its purview, it's the new disinformation board that would come up with the best practices for any DHS agency handling the disinformation.
Fact Sheet: DHS Internal Working Group Protects Free Speech Other Fundamental Rights When Addressing Disinformation That Threatens the Security of the United States | Homeland Security
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is charged with safeguarding the United States against threats to its security, including threats exacerbated by disinformation.www.dhs.gov
Wishful thinking.Right now I see them helping with communication across agencies on threat assessments. I’d imagine that actions taken would but on a case by case basis and similar to current SOPs
What if the people who wrote the source materials are lying about their intentions?Only a true hack would consider researching source materials a waste of time.
biden's staff: okay sir we need someone to head this new officewell she must be good at something to rate the gig Joe's given to her.
Wake me up when a Democrat says it...![]()
U.S. senator says Biden administration disinformation board likely illegal - Real America's Voice News
Real America's Voice News is your one stop news and entertainment network.americasvoice.news
U.S. senator says Biden administration disinformation board likely illegal
Boy these democrats are going to be wiped out with the stunts these lunatics pulled.
The White House has already done it.Where does it say this board would take over deciding who’s social media gets shut off? Can you post a link?
kondor3 said:Wake me up when a Democrat says it...
I dont believe youYou are nowhere near as informed a I am. Who decides biatch?
Really where are you seeing that protocol. Can you post a link?The CIA and FBI already monitor specific threats. This new "Board" is designed to monitor all information, internal or external, and take action based on their interpretation of the speech. This is way beyond monitoring communications between known terrorists. They have virtually no oversight.
If you can't see the potential for abuse based on politics, I'm afraid there isn't much I can do for you.
You’re being sarcastic right??Sorry bout that,
1. Well its not in the Constitution, like some paragraph, stating a *Truth* ministry shall be established by the government with rules of said committee.
2. So that simple fact makes it *UNCONSTITUTIONAL* .
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
As I said… true hackI consider anything you post as a waste of time.
The government has the responsibility to determine what is a threat to our country and act defensively do they not?The government is not supposed to interfere with free speech. Having the government determine what is true or false can interfere with free speech. Plus our wonderful government lies to us all the time.
![]()
10 People Who Exposed US Government Secrets And Lies - Listverse
It seems like another skeleton falls out of the United States’ closet every day. Whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork, and the government islistverse.com