Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very, very few Americans and even the Supreme Court objected to the internment of JapaneseHave Republicans ever opposed the use of nuclear weapons or the internment of Japanese?Since its inception by [ex]-slave owners until present day, they are also the only party to use nuclear weapons on fellow humans and intern U.S. citizens in concentration camps and they owe reparations, all of which they like to pretend everyone else shares their guilt in.And what time period are you referring to?
Some did, but they were outnumbered. Senator Taft of Ohio and Governor Carr of Colorado were leading the opposition, without much of support. FDR, although winning war, was one of the worst US presidents of all time, but that is another story for another thread.
View attachment 307654 I wish he was still here
It paved the way for Jim Crow as a substitute for slaveryWhy republicans of today want to continue telling lies about their party is pathetic. Rutherford P. Hayes ended reconstruction with a compromise with democrats so he could become president. That is not defending the rights of blacks and that is an example of how complicit republicans were in the apartheid that took place in America after slavery until at least 1965.
HuhView attachment 307654 I wish he was still here
Why is he on the phone?
Very, very few Americans and even the Supreme Court objected to the internment of JapaneseHave Republicans ever opposed the use of nuclear weapons or the internment of Japanese?Since its inception by [ex]-slave owners until present day, they are also the only party to use nuclear weapons on fellow humans and intern U.S. citizens in concentration camps and they owe reparations, all of which they like to pretend everyone else shares their guilt in.And what time period are you referring to?
Some did, but they were outnumbered. Senator Taft of Ohio and Governor Carr of Colorado were leading the opposition, without much of support. FDR, although winning war, was one of the worst US presidents of all time, but that is another story for another thread.
After Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were seen as a security threat
It was more than law, it was a way of life.It paved the way for Jim Crow as a substitute for slaveryWhy republicans of today want to continue telling lies about their party is pathetic. Rutherford P. Hayes ended reconstruction with a compromise with democrats so he could become president. That is not defending the rights of blacks and that is an example of how complicit republicans were in the apartheid that took place in America after slavery until at least 1965.
Every single Jim Crow law was enacted by Democratic legislators, signed by Democratic governors, and upheld by Democratic judges. Segregationist in Chief Woodrow Wilson was Democrat.
It was more than law, it was a way of life.It paved the way for Jim Crow as a substitute for slaveryWhy republicans of today want to continue telling lies about their party is pathetic. Rutherford P. Hayes ended reconstruction with a compromise with democrats so he could become president. That is not defending the rights of blacks and that is an example of how complicit republicans were in the apartheid that took place in America after slavery until at least 1965.
Every single Jim Crow law was enacted by Democratic legislators, signed by Democratic governors, and upheld by Democratic judges. Segregationist in Chief Woodrow Wilson was Democrat.
It was enforced in homes, neighborhoods, businesses not by law, but the people of the south that expected it.
It was not a political issue as both Democrats and Republicans in the south supported it.
Wrong.It paved the way for Jim Crow as a substitute for slaveryWhy republicans of today want to continue telling lies about their party is pathetic. Rutherford P. Hayes ended reconstruction with a compromise with democrats so he could become president. That is not defending the rights of blacks and that is an example of how complicit republicans were in the apartheid that took place in America after slavery until at least 1965.
Every single Jim Crow law was enacted by Democratic legislators, signed by Democratic governors, and upheld by Democratic judges. Segregationist in Chief Woodrow Wilson was Democrat.
True.Well, you can't copy/paste a link from an AM radio....Two years ago....but isn't it odd that that poster couldn't provide that for us?From 2017:And yet....you make a claim that there are polls (more than one) that state that the majority of Americans want the con-federate statues to stay up.....Not only can't you provide us with one example, you get shrill and name-call when asked to prove your assertion.Nuttin' like a "lie" that you can't quote and only you can see because you have the secret decoder ring.
No, we discussed it at length. He is just lying, because he is a liberal.
You are a liberal, so you know that is the way it goes. You people just say shit. It don't mean nuthin.
Polls shows majority of Americans think Confederate statues should remain
I see you are back to shrill name-calling. You provided no poll...a liberal had to find a 2 year old poll because you had nothing.You didn't do it because you had no idea such polls really existed. You lied. We know you lied. You are a liar. Ipso Facto. Cultural thing?Two years ago....but isn't it odd that that poster couldn't provide that for us?From 2017:And yet....you make a claim that there are polls (more than one) that state that the majority of Americans want the con-federate statues to stay up.....Not only can't you provide us with one example, you get shrill and name-call when asked to prove your assertion.
Polls shows majority of Americans think Confederate statues should remain
I clearly stated that I was not going to do it, and why. That you insist of calling that "could not" is just you being a lying asshole.
But regardless of that, you now have the poll. So, what does it change for you?
1. Your lies are noted and dismissed. You are a lying asshole.
2. So, you got the poll. It has been proven that the majority of Americans support the statues. What dos that mean to you? Rhetorical question. We both know that you never cared. You were just being a troll.
You mean the guy who said there shouldn't be any memorials to the Con-federacy?View attachment 307654 I wish he was still here
That's funny considering that all the male crybabies are trump supporters.The NAZIS lasted twice as long as the Con-federacy did.I can see that you would not want to celebrate such ancestors if they were your ancestors.
Correct!
I’d be ashamed and embarrassed of them.
Well, lots of other people, are more forgiving of their ancestors and celebrate them.
Yes, like the Germans with the Nazis.
Yeah, Democrats were pussies back then, now they're called snowflakes..
For the sake of this discussion only lets say they haven't...do you realize that still means that the left is the only ones to intern American citizens and use nuclear weapons on their fellow man?Have Republicans ever opposed the use of nuclear weapons or the internment of Japanese?
For the sake of this discussion only lets say they haven't...do you realize that still means that the left is the only ones to intern American citizens and use nuclear weapons on their fellow man?Have Republicans ever opposed the use of nuclear weapons or the internment of Japanese?
Perhaps not, but not my point, the left are the only ones to use them on their fellow man....something some on the left used to enjoy pointing out and sharing as Americas guilt, [much as they do with most of their heinous acts] not allowing them to blame America seems to stick in their craw.Party affiliation has nothing to do with use of nuclear weapons in WWII.
Once AGAIN stoopid --- political parties do not wield weapons or run wars.
And really, you sound so brightHoly SHIT you're a moron.
And in any moral argument about it today, you will clearly find the people on the right generally arguing for it, with arguments against coming from the left.So, join us in the present and in reality.Perhaps not, but not my point, the left are the only ones to use them on their fellow man.
All that claims is today the right sees what the democrats did as OK with them, and that the left thinks the democrats were wrong for doing what they did, but in making that claim your post proves I am correct since by pointing out who agrees and disagrees with what the democrats did means it happened as I claim.And in any moral argument about it today, you will clearly find the people on the right generally arguing for it, with arguments against coming from the left.
So, join us in the present and in reality.
Uh... okay... you are correct, in that a relatively progressive president used nukes... what do you want, a cookie? Join us in 2020.All that claims is today the right sees what the democrats did as OK with them, and that the left thinks the democrats were wrong for doing what they did, but in making that claim your post proves I am correct since by pointing out who agrees and disagrees with what the democrats did means it happened as I claim.
