Because they do not (so far) have the "demographics" anywhere near ours!!!The Europeans and Japanese either address these problems or don't have them as a factor, and they have nowhere near our crime rates.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because they do not (so far) have the "demographics" anywhere near ours!!!The Europeans and Japanese either address these problems or don't have them as a factor, and they have nowhere near our crime rates.
IIRC but didn't he killer her to get the rifle or is that a different person?No, his mother did and she was as crazy as he was.
An AR-15 is identical to the M16 I carried in the army (except it doesn't fire full auto unless modified.) The weapon was specifically designed dor military use.
Nancy Lanza was a prepper crazy who had enough guns to fight off the Zombie Apocolypse.
so, you put your foot in your mouth?(except it doesn't fire full auto unless modified.)
Naw, he killed her because she wanted to put him in a home. Clearly, since he had access to her guns, he didn't need to kill her to get them.IIRC but didn't he killer her to get the rifle or is that a different person?
Hundreds, if not thousands, of firearm aficionados have far more weapons than she did.
That doesn't make them crazy.
Yeah, actually it does. Probably have tiny dicks, too.
I think risking your life to steal from someone is incredibly stupid. You could get killed doing that.I think risking your life over a car is stupid. This man could have easily been killed.
Unlikely, as only 200 homicides a year are civilians killing criminals.I think risking your life to steal from someone is incredibly stupid. You could get killed doing that.
Your numbers in every case are bullshit.Unlikely, as only 200 homicides a year are civilians killing criminals.
Compared to 19000 homicides which are criminals killing civilians.
But that wasn't your claim... Your claim was.Your numbers in every case are bullshit.
And killing the criminal isn't a requirement. Merely chasing them away is all that is needed. That happens hundreds of thousands of times a year. That also doesn't count the number of criminals who are WOUNDED. But, we all know that you lie because that's all you have.
I think risking your life to steal from someone is incredibly stupid. You could get killed doing that.
Again, it's a fucking car.
I'm on my fifth car. I don't particularly miss any of the previous four bad enough to where I'd kill someone over them. I'd have to live with that the rest of my life.
Check your privilege. It's easy to be moral if you went to sleep last night with a full belly in a warm bed.
50% of stolen cars are recovered by police. The rest are covered by insurance. Still not worth risking your life over. Cars can be replaced. Your life cannot.
If someone is willing to risk jail to steal a car, a gun isn't going to be much of a deterrent, especially if they can get a gun of their own.
Yeah, actually it does. Probably have tiny dicks, too.
Do you or do you not understand that not everyone has full insurance coverage on their cars! (Heck, I don't have comprehensive insurance on my Hyundai, it's not worth the cost on a ~$2000 car.) Every time I think you couldn't possibly be more out of touch, you squeeze out a jewel like this. For MANY people, a stolen car would be a catastrophe.
Do you think being involved in a fatal shooting over a car would be LESS of a disaster? The civil and criminal costs are going to cost you far more than replacing car.That's nonsensical. Do you not understand that for some people, no car is a disaster?
Joeb, proving yet again that socialists don't give a shit about the poor, they only care about power.I'm sorry you are such a loser in life, Ditchweed.
Do you think being involved in a fatal shooting over a car would be LESS of a disaster? The civil and criminal costs are going to cost you far more than replacing car.
I'm sorry you are such a loser in life, Ditchweed.
Do you think being involved in a fatal shooting over a car would be LESS of a disaster? The civil and criminal costs are going to cost you far more than replacing car.
I don't want the poor murdering people in the street over a junker car, I'm not sure why you do.Joeb, proving yet again that socialists don't give a shit about the poor, they only care about power.
Well, that would make sense if we actually addressed the underlying roots of crime - Poverty, Racism, Mental Illness, addiction, and gun proliferation. The Europeans and Japanese either address these problems or don't have them as a factor, and they have nowhere near our crime rates.
Well, depending on the jurisdiction, it might not be “murder.”I don't want the poor murdering people in the street over a junker car, I'm not sure why you do.