Voter Fraud? Well, Maybe ...

[Harpy Eagle]

It is clear what happened. All the Trumpster from the surrounding states who knew their states were a lost cause all went to NH to try and turn that state, but they failed.

So as is typical with you mentally ill leftists, ANYTHING but the truth

Feel free to prove me wrong, since you know the truth. I will be waiting for your proof of who the votes went to.

 

[Muhammed]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

Can you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that ridiculous conclusion?

 

[BULLDOG]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

 

[Lastamender]

What about Russia?

What about it? The investigation is still pretty fresh, but they will give their report in due time.

The investigation is a joke. You can identify with that, I'd bet.

It's good that you enjoy it. It will last a while longer.

The longer it lasts the worse Democrats, Hillary, Obama, and Comey look. Trump has whipped them already.

He lost the popular vote -- not a whip or a trouncing, just an election outcome that would have made most real leaders embrace bipartisanship earlier that the Orange PINO has.

The Democrats were trounced. Clinton had the money not to be trounced. Think she spent it wisely?

 

[Muhammed]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

There was no fraud, moron. Get your head out of Rush Limbaugh's ass and wise up

 

[BULLDOG]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

 

[radical right]

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

Why don't they think congress is a fraud, when they held the vote to repeal obamacare open for two hours longer than the rules normally allow.

 

[Muhammed]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

 

[radical right]

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

That's what democrats said of the russian collusion with all those Trump associates

 

[Muhammed]

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

That's what democrats said of the russian collusion with all those Trump associates

There was no Russian collusion.

Wikileaks released the leaked DNC emails. Damning evidence that is proof that the DNC's pantsuit mafia rigged the election.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

They did not rig an election, moron. The DNC has the right to choose their candidate any way they choose. There is no law that says they have to follow the will of the people that voted. They can give one candidate 1000 extra votes starting off if they want, and it would not be illegal or fraud.

Please learn a little history so you do not so so moronic.

 

[BULLDOG]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

There is no legal requirement to even have a primary election, and any practices used are strictly determined by the DNC and can change at any time. Half way through the primary, they could have decided that the final candidate would be determined by a dance competition, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. They could have chosen someone who wasn't even on the primary ballot for their candidate, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. You're whining about something that didn't even concern your party, and that you know nothing about. Why are you doing that?

For the presidential election, there are very specific rules, and there is an investigation happening right now to see if those rules were broken.

 

[Muhammed]

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

There is no legal requirement to even have a primary election, and any practices used are strictly determined by the DNC and can change at any time. Half way through the primary, they could have decided that the final candidate would be determined by a dance competition, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. They could have chosen someone who wasn't even on the primary ballot for their candidate, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. You're whining about something that didn't even concern your party, and that you know nothing about. Why are you doing that?

For the presidential election, there are very specific rules, and there is an investigation happening right now to see if those rules were broken.

You are wrong. You legally cannot tell investors that the candidates will be chosen in an impartial manner and then do the opposite. That is fraud.

The DNC's argument that the word "impartial" cannot be defined and that the election was done in an "impartial" manner is self-contradictory.

Don't be surprised if the Democratic party ceases to exist in the near future. The centrist Trump victory against extremely corrupt fascists is merely the beginning of the swamp draining process.

You jackasses are doomed.

 

[Muhammed]

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

They did not rig an election, moron. The DNC has the right to choose their candidate any way they choose. There is no law that says they have to follow the will of the people that voted. They can give one candidate 1000 extra votes starting off if they want, and it would not be illegal or fraud.

Please learn a little history so you do not so so moronic.

You are fucked in the head. The DNC is going to lose in court. The only question is how seriously they will be punished.

 

[BULLDOG]

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

There is no legal requirement to even have a primary election, and any practices used are strictly determined by the DNC and can change at any time. Half way through the primary, they could have decided that the final candidate would be determined by a dance competition, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. They could have chosen someone who wasn't even on the primary ballot for their candidate, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. You're whining about something that didn't even concern your party, and that you know nothing about. Why are you doing that?

For the presidential election, there are very specific rules, and there is an investigation happening right now to see if those rules were broken.

You are wrong. You legally cannot tell investors that the candidates will be chosen in an impartial manner and then do the opposite. That is fraud.

The DNC's argument that the word "impartial" cannot be defined and that the election was done in an "impartial" manner is self-contradictory.

Don't be surprised if the Democratic party ceases to exist in the near future. The centrist Trump victory against extremely corrupt fascists is merely the beginning of the swamp draining process.

You jackasses are doomed.

Don't be silly. The DNC legally makes and changes their rules as they see fit. Don't like it? Tough.

 

[Muhammed]

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

There is no legal requirement to even have a primary election, and any practices used are strictly determined by the DNC and can change at any time. Half way through the primary, they could have decided that the final candidate would be determined by a dance competition, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. They could have chosen someone who wasn't even on the primary ballot for their candidate, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. You're whining about something that didn't even concern your party, and that you know nothing about. Why are you doing that?

For the presidential election, there are very specific rules, and there is an investigation happening right now to see if those rules were broken.

You are wrong. You legally cannot tell investors that the candidates will be chosen in an impartial manner and then do the opposite. That is fraud.

The DNC's argument that the word "impartial" cannot be defined and that the election was done in an "impartial" manner is self-contradictory.

Don't be surprised if the Democratic party ceases to exist in the near future. The centrist Trump victory against extremely corrupt fascists is merely the beginning of the swamp draining process.

You jackasses are doomed.

Don't be silly. The DNC legally makes and changes their rules as they see fit. Don't like it? Tough.

They broke their own rules instead of changing them, jackass.

I know why I think your vote should not matter. It is because of your obviously low IQ and ignorance. Just as I think a two year old should not be able to vote, I think people like you should not be able to vote.

What I would like to know is why you personally think that your vote should not matter.

 

[BULLDOG]

Not fraud if you have the legal right to do what was done.

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

There is no legal requirement to even have a primary election, and any practices used are strictly determined by the DNC and can change at any time. Half way through the primary, they could have decided that the final candidate would be determined by a dance competition, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. They could have chosen someone who wasn't even on the primary ballot for their candidate, and they would be perfectly legal to do that. You're whining about something that didn't even concern your party, and that you know nothing about. Why are you doing that?

For the presidential election, there are very specific rules, and there is an investigation happening right now to see if those rules were broken.

You are wrong. You legally cannot tell investors that the candidates will be chosen in an impartial manner and then do the opposite. That is fraud.

The DNC's argument that the word "impartial" cannot be defined and that the election was done in an "impartial" manner is self-contradictory.

Don't be surprised if the Democratic party ceases to exist in the near future. The centrist Trump victory against extremely corrupt fascists is merely the beginning of the swamp draining process.

You jackasses are doomed.

Don't be silly. The DNC legally makes and changes their rules as they see fit. Don't like it? Tough.

They broke their own rules instead of changing them, jackass.

I know why I think your vote should not matter. It is because of your obviously low IQ and ignorance. Just as I think a two year old should not be able to vote, I think people like you should not be able to vote.

What I would like to know is why you personally think that your vote should not matter.

My vote certainly counts as much as yours does.

 

[busybee01]

Anyone who thinks that the pantsuit mafia did not try to rig the general election even though it has been proven that they rigged the primary is a fucking idiot.

Clinton supporters are the biggest group of dumbasses on the face of the Earth.

The Democrat primaries were not rigged. Clinton got the nomination because she got 55% of the primary vote.

There were some ethical questions concerning Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but they were minor, and considering that the DNC can legally do anything they want concerning the choice of nominee, those questions are moot anyway.

Fraud is a crime, jackass.

What fraud? Clinton got 55% of the primary vote to 44% for Sanders. There is nothing fraudulent about it.

 

[busybee01]

There is no legal right to rig the election, jackass.

That's what democrats said of the russian collusion with all those Trump associates

There was no Russian collusion.

Wikileaks released the leaked DNC emails. Damning evidence that is proof that the DNC's pantsuit mafia rigged the election.

WikiLeaks got the emails from Russia. Assange has several ties to Putin.