Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why, just because YOU claim they are, Rumpot?Incompetent comment:
But so seemingly fitting that you are a weasel.Weasel words are weak as an argument.
Yet these are the kinds of replies you attract. Rummy, why do I get the impression that you are a fat, old, musty dude who sits around for days smelling wearing the same clothes rarely showering? Just an impression your avatar gives. Much like your stinky, holier-than-thou attitude.Weasel words are generalizations rife with cheap shots, ad homs, loaded phrases, etc.
that would violate international law, since we're destroying something that hasnt violated our airspace, and doesnt belong to us.Then why didn’t they shoot it down before it even reached U.S. airspace?
we know you wanted the balloon to be taken down over land, so you could blame Biden for endangering our air traffic. And the who ever's property it landed on would forever become a hero of the right, for Biden damaged their property in some way.You still believe that spin!
HahahhahahahaahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahHhhhHAHAAaaa
Then why not drop it over the barren area of Alaska? Or even the unpopulated areas of the mainland over which it flew?that would violate international law, since we're destroying something that hasnt violated our airspace, and doesnt belong to us.
/——/ Fake News that the popular votes matters other than a news story.View attachment 774550
Cellblock2429 - You flagged the above post as "Fake News". Sorry, Clinton was ahead of the Trump at the national level based on the average of many polls.
Not fake news.
WW
we know you wanted the balloon to be taken down over land, so you could blame Biden for endangering our air traffic. And the who ever's property it landed on would forever become a hero of the right, for Biden damaged their property in some way.
that would violate international law, since we're destroying something that hasnt violated our airspace, and doesnt belong to us.
Dalton explained that shooting it down over Alaska was deemed to be unviable as it would make recovering the high-altitude aircraft far harder and far less likely to yield strong intelligence.Why not over Alaskan waters?
If the hush money was over $2700 and the payment was intended to influence the election it's an illegal campaign contribution. The Trump $130,000 was an illegal campaign contribution. This is why hush money payments are illegal. It doesn't matter whether the results of the election were influenced or not and fraud is not the issue in this campaign violation. All Bragg has to do is convince a jury that the payment was not to protect the good name of Donald Trump but rather to benefit the campaign.They are one and the same. The only conceivable harm to the campaign is the reputational damage to the candidate.
In what way was the NDA "saving the campaign" in your mind?
So basically you know it was a crime because it was Trump.
He made the payments to Michael Cohen to conceal the fact that Cohen made an illegal campaign contribution (the Daniels NDA).
Cohen's giving the money to Daniels for the NDA "saved the campaign". And Trump thought that paying Cohen back would conceal Cohen's campaign finance violation.
Did Trump win New York thanks to this "crime"? Who was defrauded?
The McDougal hush money which was paid in 2016 to keep her story from being released could also be an underlying crime. In the indictment there were a number checks paid but not to Cohen. That could have been the payoff to suppress her story or something elses because there was no payee listed in indictment for those checks.The false business flings. They don't charge you with a crime for honest mistakes. You are only charged if you did so with an intent to defraud the State.
And if that intent to defraud the State includes committal/concealment of another crime, now it's a felony.
Thanks. It looks like there are several crimes. I wonder if Bragg can tie all of them to falsified records charge.It's all in the statement of facts that accompanies the indictment.
That's all it talks about.
The DOJ and the previous Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. both looked at the NDA and concluded they couldn't call it a campaign finance violation. The SoF focuses almost entirely on the NDA, so based on that, I'd say Bragg has his work cut out for him.Thanks. It looks like there are several crimes. I wonder if Bragg can tie all of them to falsified records charge.
If the hush money was over $2700 and the payment was intended to influence the election it's an illegal campaign contribution. The Trump $130,000 was an illegal campaign contribution. This is why hush money payments are illegal. It doesn't matter whether the results of the election were influenced or not and fraud is not the issue in this campaign violation. All Bragg has to do is convince a jury that the payment was not to protect the good name of Donald Trump but rather to benefit the campaign.
The McDougal hush money which was paid in 2016 to keep her story from being released could also be an underlying crime. In the indictment there were a number checks paid but not to Cohen. That could have been the payoff to suppress her story or something elses because there was no payee listed in indictment for those checks.
He doesn’t need to. Daniels is enoughThanks. It looks like there are several crimes. I wonder if Bragg can tie all of them to falsified records charge.
So given all that, how was it that the DOJ prosecuted Cohen ?The DOJ and the previous Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. both looked at the NDA and concluded they couldn't call it a campaign finance violation. The SoF focuses almost entirely on the NDA, so based on that, I'd say Bragg has his work cut out for him.
Classifying the Cohen payments as legal expenses on the books might be tax evasion if Trump deducted the money as a business expense- but the SoF says he paid it from his personal account. Vance had his tax records, so I would guess that Trump probably didn't deduct the payments- Vance should have bounced on that if it was there.
Lots of inferences, not much in thge way of real evidence that I can see...
It certainly was in Cohan’s caseThis is why hush money payments are illegal.
They aren't.
It certainly was in Cohan’s case
That one got him convicted.He must have made hush money payments a bunch of times. Only one was illegal?
Not a cool as you! Congratulations, you've earned it! I now have incontrovertibleCheers,
Rumphole
You're so cool!
The indictment does show ALL the charges under which Trump was charged. They all stem from Section 175.10 of the New York State Penal Code on First Degree Falsification of Business Records.
WW
