What crime did Trump commit? I need a citation to a federal or state statute

[regent]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.

If there was a crime, we would know what it is by now.

If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

• The House decides to impeach or not. No legal crime needs to have been committed, only the necessary votes to impeach and the guilty Senate vote to remove. America does not have "high crimes" that was lifted from the English parliament. Johnson was impeached on House votes on 11 charges, the tenth being Johnson yelled at the Congress.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

If the Constitution said that message boarders must draw up the charges I would gladly do so, but the Constitution says the House is responsible for the charges. America does not have high crimes.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is anyone NOT surprised that the OP doesn't realize that the investigations are ONGOING?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.

If there was a crime, we would know what it is by now.

If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

• The House decides to impeach or not. No legal crime needs to have been committed, only the necessary votes to impeach and the guilty Senate vote to remove. America does not have "high crimes" that was lifted from the English parliament. Johnson was impeached on House votes on 11 charges, the tenth being Johnson yelled at the Congress.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

 

[jc456]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.

If there was a crime, we would know what it is by now.

If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

• The House decides to impeach or not. No legal crime needs to have been committed, only the necessary votes to impeach and the guilty Senate vote to remove. America does not have "high crimes" that was lifted from the English parliament. Johnson was impeached on House votes on 11 charges, the tenth being Johnson yelled at the Congress.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

what crime?

 

[bripat9643]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.

If there was a crime, we would know what it is by now.

If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

• The House decides to impeach or not. No legal crime needs to have been committed, only the necessary votes to impeach and the guilty Senate vote to remove. America does not have "high crimes" that was lifted from the English parliament. Johnson was impeached on House votes on 11 charges, the tenth being Johnson yelled at the Congress.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.
If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

Only in a witch hunt. In a legitimate constitutional investigation some kind of crime must have occurred to justify any investigation.

Look up the definition of prima facie you fucking IDIOT to see how fucking wrong you are. Now go over in the corner and play with something, ya damn Peckerwood!

 

[bripat9643]

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

Only in a witch hunt. In a legitimate constitutional investigation some kind of crime must have occurred to justify any investigation.

You just said you have no evidence of any crime. How many times are you dumbass snowflakes going to keep admitting that?

 

[bripat9643]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

I remember Nixon making the same complaints back in '72, '73 and '74 while he was being investigated with all of his obstruction of the Watergate investigation.

If there was a crime, we would know what it is by now.

If one goes all the way back to the "plumbers" break-in of Daniel Ellsberg's office re: the 'Pentagon Papers in Sept 1971 beginning the investigations of Nixon's cabal, it should be clear that it took three years for the charges to eventually be drafted that were his Articles of Impeachment (see link below).

In comparison, the Purple Assed Orange Baboon in the WH hasn't even been in office 180 days yet and his fat & pendulous tit is 3/4's of the way through the ringer with a FULL BLOWN investigation that should be shoving out Grand Jury indictments sometime between Labor Day to the New Year and continuing for maybe 6-12 months afterward. You'll be informed of the crimes being charged and the Who in good time. Why are you so nervous for the Idiot-in-Chief? Sit back and enjoy the show!

Nixon;
Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

• The House decides to impeach or not. No legal crime needs to have been committed, only the necessary votes to impeach and the guilty Senate vote to remove. America does not have "high crimes" that was lifted from the English parliament. Johnson was impeached on House votes on 11 charges, the tenth being Johnson yelled at the Congress.

well sure there has to be a high crime. sorry to burst your bubble. even the house rep that submitted the article says it ain't going anywhere, he just wants trump to stop tweeting. LOL

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

That's another way of you admitting that there isn't a shred of evidence.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

Only in a witch hunt. In a legitimate constitutional investigation some kind of crime must have occurred to justify any investigation.

You just said you have no evidence of any crime. How many times are you dumbass snowflakes going to keep admitting that?

You just said you have no evidence of any crime.

Where did I say that you fucking liar? Here is what I wrote;
"An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!"

All I wrote was a brief synopsis of a pro forma process, dummy! Now where in that sentence did I say no crime was committed, you fucking liar?

 

[bodecea]

Here it is, tell me what crime Trump committed.

Otherwise, all this talk is complete bullshit, a McCarthyite witch hunt.

Has trump been charged with any crimes yet?

Not yet, and it's already July. That's seven months.

And....seven months since.....?

You should tell us. This is yalls wet dream.

I'm not the one who claimed 7 months....try reading sometime. Actually, maybe that's asking too much of you.

 

[jc456]

Your Watergate fantasies aren't going to be replayed, nitwit. Just get accustomed to that fact right now and you'll be a lot happier when it doesn't happen.

Maybe you can define what a high crime is.

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

 

[bodecea]

The thread question has been answered and no defensive response has been posted. Rather, the defense is deflection and evasion.

One answer to the thread question, CFR 110.20. That is one of the laws that apply.

In your dreams Jose. 2024 until you might see another democrat in the whitehouse.

The funny thing is, even if that were to be true....all the way, you trumpanzees would still cry victim.

 

[radical right]

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

It's time you stop defending the now proven lies and liars. Trump said there was no collusion. Not only was there collusion, the number of russians attending the meetings has just tripled.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

The House is responsible for drawing up the impeachment charges. Impeachment is a political process trial not a legal court trial. The Court has said, however, that it must be conducted as per the Constitution.

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

You got your head up your ass, and that's all that's backwards here! But you are correct that collusion not, necessarily being a crime. But conspiracy, lying to the FBI and accepting anything of value for something of gain as legally defined certainly is and those are just a few of the potential crimes being investigated.

 

[jc456]

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

It's time you stop defending the now proven lies and liars. Trump said there was no collusion. Not only was there collusion, the number of russians attending the meetings has just tripled.

there was no collusion, if there was any, so what? it isn't a crime. already stated in my previous post. so I'm still waiting on what crime there was. got one? nope!

 

[jc456]

In other words, you can't list any actual laws that the Trump administration has broke.

We already knew that.

Here's another muppet who doesn't realize that the criminal investigations haven't been completed.

What's the crime, douche bag?

What's the crime, douche bag?

You fucking IDIOT pygmy minded jack ass! An investigation must take place to compile any list of the crimes and which laws, if any, were broken you ignorant fucking illogical imbecile!

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

You got your head up your ass, and that's all that's backwards here!

so you got nothing. figures. the left never have anything worth while to share in here.

 

[jc456]

The thread question has been answered and no defensive response has been posted. Rather, the defense is deflection and evasion.

One answer to the thread question, CFR 110.20. That is one of the laws that apply.

In your dreams Jose. 2024 until you might see another democrat in the whitehouse.

The funny thing is, even if that were to be true....all the way, you trumpanzees would still cry victim.

if it works don't change a thing. yours hasn't worked, you haven't changed a thing and you continue to lose. point set match.

 

[radical right]

Trumps son-in-law updated his security clearance SF-86 three times, adding over 100 names. and that doesn't even include the three russians he met with in june. 2016. Here comes security clearance update number four.

Would anybody else still have a security clearance after having to change his tune so many times.

 

[Camp]

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

It's time you stop defending the now proven lies and liars. Trump said there was no collusion. Not only was there collusion, the number of russians attending the meetings has just tripled.

there was no collusion, if there was any, so what? it isn't a crime. already stated in my previous post. so I'm still waiting on what crime there was. got one? nope!

Collusion itself is not a crime and that is what you are stuck on. Collusion can lead to conspiracy and other crimes. When people collude to commit an unlawful act it is called conspiracy. Conspiracy is a crime.

 

[bripat9643]

no, that is absolutely back assward. supposed crime, then an investigation to prove it as such. we're still waiting for the supposed crime. got one yet. there is no investigation. BTW, if you say collusion, that isn't a crime.

It's time you stop defending the now proven lies and liars. Trump said there was no collusion. Not only was there collusion, the number of russians attending the meetings has just tripled.

There isn't a shred of evidence for collusion, shit for brains, and 8 is not 3 X 6.

You're an idiot, of course. No one who has a room temperature IQ could post stuff as dumb as the stuff you post.