What do conservative and liberal mean?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

thats exactly what they have against christians,,,they have no morals so dont like being called on them

Christians invented morality. Before Christ we were Romans with no morality. Do you understand?

 

[LaDexter]

absurd even trump barely a conservative cut taxes and regulations and appointed conservatives to court

Another nitwit self IDing as a "conservative."

Hey, pal, Trump tried to CUT SPENDING. WHO BLOCKED HIM from CUTTING SPENDING the PAST TWO YEARS???

Answer - not Schumer or Pelosi...

The Republican Party last cut spending in 1998....

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

To be HUMAN is to THINK and ASK QUESTIONS. Christians don't. Christians PARROT.
.

some Christians parrot and some are great philosophers. Do you understand now?

 

[LaDexter]

Christians invented morality. Before Christ we were Romans with no morality. Do you understand?

and you were THERE, you saw all with your OWN eyes, and you know better about Jesus than those who actually observed him, because you are a

SUB HUMAN

who PARROTS and sings songs....

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

.

The Republican Party last cut spending in 1998....

you miss the point completely. They would cut it tomorrow if there was enough support for it.

 

[deanrd]

What do conservative and liberal mean?

1) Those like our Founders who believed in and wanted personal freedom and thus a limited central government.

2) Those like our Founders who believed a central government was like a monopoly and thus would be mostly mistaken and inefficient at best, and genocidal at worst.

3) Those like our Founders who believed that personal freedom was not only most fulfilling ( pride in being self/family-supporting, etc.) but was best for humankind because it forced every individual to support himself (like a link in a chain) and thus strengthen the entire community rather than identify some as dependent (or weak links) on others and not contributors.

Liberal are the opposite-right?

You can't keep saying "like our founders" because they were liberal.

Declaring independence is the very essence of "liberal".

 

[LaDexter]

To be HUMAN is to THINK and ASK QUESTIONS. Christians don't. Christians PARROT.
.

some Christians parrot and some are great philosophers. Do you understand now?

ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS, SUB HUMAN.

You won't, because your "answers" are as pathetic as they are laughable...

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

and you were THERE, you saw all with your OWN eyes,

I gather you don't know the story of Christ and Rome?? Why not read all about it??

 

[LaDexter]

Declaring independence is the very essence of "liberal

Today's "liberal" is 180 degrees in the opposite direction, trying to be completely DEPENDENT on taxpayer funded handouts....

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS, SUB HUMAN.
..

give me one question to answer please.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Declaring independence is the very essence of "liberal".

moronic. HItler Stalin and Mao declared independence too!!

 

[LaDexter]

To be HUMAN is to THINK and ASK QUESTIONS. Christians don't. Christians PARROT.

Christians don't like questions like

1. Does "soon" really mean "more than 1800 years from now?"
2. When Jesus said "give up everything and follow me," who got EVERYTHING?
3. Are the Disciples "credible" given that they BOLTED from the "authorities" who came to arrest Jesus AND THEM?
4. Given that the only demographic that observed Jesus when he lived was the Jewish demographic, and they reject him and consider him a fraud, why would anyone who DID NOT OBSERVE Jesus think he or she knows MORE than those who actually did??

Christians are not HUMANS. They are SUB HUMANS. They should not be allowed to vote on that basis.

Do you need it posted a 3rd time??

 

[georgephillip]

Those like our Founders who believed a central government was like a monopoly and thus would be mostly mistaken and inefficient at best, and genocidal at worst.

Why do conservatives support genocide and slavery?

You should at least be willing to acknowledge the fact US Founders launched their revolution in reaction to the Somerset principle, and the capitalist desire to steal the land of others.

they came here for religious freedom if you check your history books

Their slaves came here for economic exploitation; does that strike you as a perverse version of limited government?

Somerset v Stewart - Wikipedia

"The state of slavery is of such a nature that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law [statute], which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasions, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory.

"It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law."

neither government nor the constitution brought slaves here,,,people brought slaves, the constitution is what made them free

The Constitution needed a little help to free the slaves:

King Cotton would have never turned loose of its "property" without hundreds of thousands of people dying.

It puts our current standard of living in a slightly different light when you consider for the first hundred years US capitalists enjoyed "free labor" in Dixie.

 

[progressive hunter]

Those like our Founders who believed a central government was like a monopoly and thus would be mostly mistaken and inefficient at best, and genocidal at worst.

Why do conservatives support genocide and slavery?

You should at least be willing to acknowledge the fact US Founders launched their revolution in reaction to the Somerset principle, and the capitalist desire to steal the land of others.

they came here for religious freedom if you check your history books

Their slaves came here for economic exploitation; does that strike you as a perverse version of limited government?

Somerset v Stewart - Wikipedia

"The state of slavery is of such a nature that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law [statute], which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasions, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory.

"It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law."

neither government nor the constitution brought slaves here,,,people brought slaves, the constitution is what made them free

The Constitution needed a little help to free the slaves:

King Cotton would have never turned loose of its "property" without hundreds of thousands of people dying.

It puts our current standard of living in a slightly different light when you consider for the first hundred years US capitalists enjoyed "free labor" in Dixie.

what was it?? less than 3% of the population were slaves/?

the profit of those that owned slaves were minimal at best, and from what I've heard is they would have been better off to pick it themselves

bottom line is they owned slaves due to a narcissist attitude and not for the profit

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

To be HUMAN is to THINK and ASK QUESTIONS. Christians don't. Christians PARROT.

Christians don't like questions like

1. Does "soon" really mean "more than 1800 years from now?"
2. When Jesus said "give up everything and follow me," who got EVERYTHING?
3. Are the Disciples "credible" given that they BOLTED from the "authorities" who came to arrest Jesus AND THEM?
4. Given that the only demographic that observed Jesus when he lived was the Jewish demographic, and they reject him and consider him a fraud, why would anyone who DID NOT OBSERVE Jesus think he or she knows MORE than those who actually did??

Christians are not HUMANS. They are SUB HUMANS. They should not be allowed to vote on that basis.

Do you need it posted a 3rd time??

we can all post things why so afraid to tell us your point or ask a question?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

US capitalists enjoyed "free labor" in Dixie.

actually under capitalism workers are free to quit. So that wasn't capitalism. Do you understand now?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It puts our current standard of living in a slightly different light

it does??????? I'd love to hear you explain how!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Votto]

..

BWAHAHAHA "Conservatives want to control women and families

so? they are for limited government, not anarchy[/QUOTE]

Nope, conservatives want to bite the heads off little immigrant babies and spit them out cuz they don't like dark meat.

At least, that is what CNN says.

 

[georgephillip]

Their slaves came here for economic exploitation; does that strike you as a perverse version of limited government?
"

slavery was part is US's limited government and part of world's unlimited government for 1 milllion years. Do you understand?

I understand how capitalists embraced chattel slavery as a first principle:

Capitalism and Slavery

"The argument that capitalism was dependent on slavery is, of course, not new.

"In 1944, Eric Williams, in Capitalism and Slavery, made the case.

"In 1968, the historian Lorenzo Greenewrote that slavery 'formed the basis of the economic life of New England: about it revolved, and on it depended, most of her other industries.'

"Even before the expansion of slave labor in the South and into the West, slavery was already an important source of northern profit, as was the already exploding slave trade in the Caribbean and South America."

One million years?
Really??

 

[hjmick]

What do conservative and liberal mean?

They keep using those words... I do not think they mean what they think they mean...