What Does An Actual RINO Look Like?

[HappyJoy]

When an entire political party is willing to abandon their frontrunner, to sabotage his campaign by throwing themselves before Hillary's feet, just who's side do you think they're on? If the party can't support the man in front, they are abandoning a part of the constituency who supports Trump. If one man can drive his party to that kind of desperation... that says more about the party and not the man.

And all the establishmentarians here on this board will have the nerve argue about loyalty. How hypocritical.

\

Hear that everybody? When the party doesn't support the demagogue then don't you feel selfish?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Donald Trump seems to unduly ruffle the feathers of our liberals.

He really gets under their incredibly thin skin.

Which is kind of funny. For although I kind of like a couple of the things he has said, I am not convinced he is trustworthy.

So there's something I have very slightly in common with our liberals: we share a basic feeling of unease with The Donald.

Actually, I just laugh at people who throw the words 'President' and 'Trump' in the same sentence. I really want the GOP to nominate him.

I have a similar humorous reaction when the leftist Democrat Parody is trying to decide if they will go full leftard and nominate Shrillary Rotten Clinton or if they will steer a slightly (ever so slightly) more moderate course and vote for the self-professed senior citizen senile Socialist, Bernie Sanders.

I know, right? It's weird and they still both beat Trump in head to head matchups. But, ignore me...please, please, please vote for Trump in the primaries.

No. They DON'T necessarly beat Trump in a head to head match up.

Furthermore, your plodding lack of comprehension got the best of you again.

I know. Story of your life.

I am not a fan of Trump.

I have basically found myself supporting Cruz.

I find it laughable that anybody could support the pigdog Shrillary or her little bitch, Bernie.

She was (as Bernie has noted) the "inevitable" one. Except, Obumbler soundly thrashed her massive ass. And now (my sides hurt here) even the senile Socialist might defeat her.

Bwahahaha! PLEASE Democraps. Vote for either of them. Have a blast.

Ok, now that you bored me. Nothing changes with the exception that your candidate of choice just got the royal treatment from Trump, expect his poll number to plummet. I guess you're going to support the establishment now? Well, not now but when you realize Cruz isn't viable.

Nobody gives a rat's twat what bores a stupid dip shit pinprick fly fucking asswipe like you.

And what Trump did to Cruz is idiotic. Palin's "endorsement" of Trump is pretty much irrelevant. I know you are a mindless twat, but even you should recognize that much.

You use terminology without even knowing what words MEAN, you dickface twat.

I support the Constitution, not "the Establishment."

And if Cruz somehow fails to take the GOP nod, you are right. I would CERTAINLY support almost any GOP nominee over EITHER Shrillary or the senile Socialist.

 

[HappyJoy]

Actually, I just laugh at people who throw the words 'President' and 'Trump' in the same sentence. I really want the GOP to nominate him.

I have a similar humorous reaction when the leftist Democrat Parody is trying to decide if they will go full leftard and nominate Shrillary Rotten Clinton or if they will steer a slightly (ever so slightly) more moderate course and vote for the self-professed senior citizen senile Socialist, Bernie Sanders.

I know, right? It's weird and they still both beat Trump in head to head matchups. But, ignore me...please, please, please vote for Trump in the primaries.

No. They DON'T necessarly beat Trump in a head to head match up.

Furthermore, your plodding lack of comprehension got the best of you again.

I know. Story of your life.

I am not a fan of Trump.

I have basically found myself supporting Cruz.

I find it laughable that anybody could support the pigdog Shrillary or her little bitch, Bernie.

She was (as Bernie has noted) the "inevitable" one. Except, Obumbler soundly thrashed her massive ass. And now (my sides hurt here) even the senile Socialist might defeat her.

Bwahahaha! PLEASE Democraps. Vote for either of them. Have a blast.

Ok, now that you bored me. Nothing changes with the exception that your candidate of choice just got the royal treatment from Trump, expect his poll number to plummet. I guess you're going to support the establishment now? Well, not now but when you realize Cruz isn't viable.

Nobody gives a rat's twat what bores a stupid dip shit pinprick fly fucking asswipe like you.

And what Trump did to Cruz is idiotic. Palin's "endorsement" of Trump is pretty much irrelevant. I know you are a mindless twat, but even you should recognize that much.

You use terminology without even knowing what words MEAN, you dickface twat.

I support the Constitution, not "the Establishment."

And if Cruz somehow fails to take the GOP nod, you are right. I would CERTAINLY support almost any GOP nominee over EITHER Shrillary or the senile Socialist.

OK, so for starters. I'm perfectly aware of what terminology like "twat" mean.

Second, you must be the last moron on the face of this earth to realize that Cruz isn't gong to make it. Not just in Iowa but anywhere, he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement. How is that remotely a stupid move for Trump in a Republican primary?

So, now you're stuck either supporting the candidate who actively took yours out or the GOP establishment. I completely expect you will support either, not because you want to but because you don't have a choice.

 

[TemplarKormac]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

 

[HappyJoy]

When an entire political party is willing to abandon their frontrunner, to sabotage his campaign by throwing themselves before Hillary's feet, just who's side do you think they're on? If the party can't support the man in front, they are abandoning a part of the constituency who supports Trump. If one man can drive his party to that kind of desperation... that says more about the party and not the man.

And all the establishmentarians here on this board will have the nerve argue about loyalty. How hypocritical.

\

Hear that everybody? When the party doesn't support the demagogue then don't you feel selfish?

That's cute coming from a liberal who would serve as the carpet beneath Hillary's feet.

I don't treat politicians or their personalities as being above anyone. I vote for what I feel is the best/does the least harm to our country, nothing more. I'm more of a Sanders guy but would happily vote for Clinton in a general election.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

I have a similar humorous reaction when the leftist Democrat Parody is trying to decide if they will go full leftard and nominate Shrillary Rotten Clinton or if they will steer a slightly (ever so slightly) more moderate course and vote for the self-professed senior citizen senile Socialist, Bernie Sanders.

I know, right? It's weird and they still both beat Trump in head to head matchups. But, ignore me...please, please, please vote for Trump in the primaries.

No. They DON'T necessarly beat Trump in a head to head match up.

Furthermore, your plodding lack of comprehension got the best of you again.

I know. Story of your life.

I am not a fan of Trump.

I have basically found myself supporting Cruz.

I find it laughable that anybody could support the pigdog Shrillary or her little bitch, Bernie.

She was (as Bernie has noted) the "inevitable" one. Except, Obumbler soundly thrashed her massive ass. And now (my sides hurt here) even the senile Socialist might defeat her.

Bwahahaha! PLEASE Democraps. Vote for either of them. Have a blast.

Ok, now that you bored me. Nothing changes with the exception that your candidate of choice just got the royal treatment from Trump, expect his poll number to plummet. I guess you're going to support the establishment now? Well, not now but when you realize Cruz isn't viable.

Nobody gives a rat's twat what bores a stupid dip shit pinprick fly fucking asswipe like you.

And what Trump did to Cruz is idiotic. Palin's "endorsement" of Trump is pretty much irrelevant. I know you are a mindless twat, but even you should recognize that much.

You use terminology without even knowing what words MEAN, you dickface twat.

I support the Constitution, not "the Establishment."

And if Cruz somehow fails to take the GOP nod, you are right. I would CERTAINLY support almost any GOP nominee over EITHER Shrillary or the senile Socialist.

OK, so for starters. I'm perfectly aware of what terminology like "twat" mean.

Second, you must be the last moron on the face of this earth to realize that Cruz isn't gong to make it. Not just in Iowa but anywhere, he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement. How is that remotely a stupid move for Trump in a Republican primary?

So, now you're stuck either supporting the candidate who actively took yours out or the GOP establishment. I completely expect you will, not because you want to but because you don't have a choice.

You only recognize what "twat" is from having been one for so long.

Cruz may not win. But brainless dickless old fuckwads like you who pontificate about what will "not" happen are far too stupid to appreciate that you might be wrong.

There is, in fact, a clear shot for Cruz. And to the extent that the main stream GOP old guard is unhappy with Cruz, I say "good." I don't want THEM to be happy. I want them to CHANGE.

The Palin endorsement doesn't mean much, frankly; but if you want to suck on it like some old cock (you quiff) then have at it.

And again, should Cruz prove not to have the juice to get the nod, then I absolutely would support the eventual GOP nominee over either Shrillary or that senile fuckwit schmuck Socialist.

In short, you could be more wrong, but it's difficult to see how you'd get there. You are an imbecile.

 

[HappyJoy]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

You're welcome but you really don't have one.

 

[TemplarKormac]

When an entire political party is willing to abandon their frontrunner, to sabotage his campaign by throwing themselves before Hillary's feet, just who's side do you think they're on? If the party can't support the man in front, they are abandoning a part of the constituency who supports Trump. If one man can drive his party to that kind of desperation... that says more about the party and not the man.

And all the establishmentarians here on this board will have the nerve argue about loyalty. How hypocritical.

\

Hear that everybody? When the party doesn't support the demagogue then don't you feel selfish?

That's cute coming from a liberal who would gladly serve as the carpet beneath Hillary's feet.

How does it feel? Huh? How does it feel treating women as a different species because they don't profess loyalty to the Democratic party?

Hah, you know nothing of loyalty.

 

[HappyJoy]

I know, right? It's weird and they still both beat Trump in head to head matchups. But, ignore me...please, please, please vote for Trump in the primaries.

No. They DON'T necessarly beat Trump in a head to head match up.

Furthermore, your plodding lack of comprehension got the best of you again.

I know. Story of your life.

I am not a fan of Trump.

I have basically found myself supporting Cruz.

I find it laughable that anybody could support the pigdog Shrillary or her little bitch, Bernie.

She was (as Bernie has noted) the "inevitable" one. Except, Obumbler soundly thrashed her massive ass. And now (my sides hurt here) even the senile Socialist might defeat her.

Bwahahaha! PLEASE Democraps. Vote for either of them. Have a blast.

Ok, now that you bored me. Nothing changes with the exception that your candidate of choice just got the royal treatment from Trump, expect his poll number to plummet. I guess you're going to support the establishment now? Well, not now but when you realize Cruz isn't viable.

Nobody gives a rat's twat what bores a stupid dip shit pinprick fly fucking asswipe like you.

And what Trump did to Cruz is idiotic. Palin's "endorsement" of Trump is pretty much irrelevant. I know you are a mindless twat, but even you should recognize that much.

You use terminology without even knowing what words MEAN, you dickface twat.

I support the Constitution, not "the Establishment."

And if Cruz somehow fails to take the GOP nod, you are right. I would CERTAINLY support almost any GOP nominee over EITHER Shrillary or the senile Socialist.

OK, so for starters. I'm perfectly aware of what terminology like "twat" mean.

Second, you must be the last moron on the face of this earth to realize that Cruz isn't gong to make it. Not just in Iowa but anywhere, he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement. How is that remotely a stupid move for Trump in a Republican primary?

So, now you're stuck either supporting the candidate who actively took yours out or the GOP establishment. I completely expect you will, not because you want to but because you don't have a choice.

You only recognize what "twat" is from having been one for so long.

Cruz may not win. But brainless dickless old fuckwads like you who pontificate about what will "not" happen are far too stupid to appreciate that you might be wrong.

There is, in fact, a clear shot for Cruz. And to the extent that the main stream GOP old guard is unhappy with Cruz, I say "good." I don't want THEM to be happy. I want them to CHANGE.

The Palin endorsement doesn't mean much, frankly. but if you want to suck on it like some old cock (you quiff) then have at it.

And again, should Cruz prove not to have the juice to get the nod, then I absolutely would support the eventual GOP nominee over either Shrillary or that senile fuckwit schmuck Socialist.

In short, you could be more wrong, but it's difficult to see how you'd get there. You are an imbecile.

I have to admit, I didn't read your post after you said "Cruz may not win" or whatever, maybe I'm paraphrasing. Anyway, it's not a matter of may not win, that fucker isn't going to win. He can't get close enough to Trump and the establishment doesn't want him. He's kind of fucked in a may not even win his senate seat back kind of way.

 

[TemplarKormac]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

You're welcome but you really don't have one.

Okay, so how do I not have a case? Explain.

 

[HappyJoy]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

You're welcome but you really don't have one.

Okay, so how do I not have a case? Explain.

Because you haven't made one.

 

[TemplarKormac]

He can't get close enough to Trump and the establishment doesn't want him.

You're you're implying that Trump and the establishment are collaborating with one another against Cruz? So why is the establishment so afraid of him?

What plane of reality are you from?

 

[TemplarKormac]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

You're welcome but you really don't have one.

Okay, so how do I not have a case? Explain.

Because you haven't made one.

That's not an answer.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

When an entire political party is willing to abandon their frontrunner, to sabotage his campaign by throwing themselves before Hillary's feet, just who's side do you think they're on? If the party can't support the man in front, they are abandoning a part of the constituency who supports Trump. If one man can drive his party to that kind of desperation... that says more about the party and not the man.

And all the establishmentarians here on this board will have the nerve argue about loyalty. How hypocritical.

Trump isn't the 'frontrunner,' the 'frontrunner' won't be known until after the primaries start – when actual voters start casting actual ballots, not as perceived by opinion polls.

The majority of republicans have every right to oppose Trump's candidacy, to oppose his ignorance and bigotry they believe don't represent the GOP, to oppose him because they correctly understand he'll lose the GE, where such opposition by a majority of republicans in no way renders them 'RINOs.'

 

[TemplarKormac]

Trump isn't the 'frontrunner,' the 'frontrunner' won't be known until after the primaries start – when actual voters start casting actual ballots, not as perceived by opinion polls.

LOL.

Says your opinion. Whoops.

 

[HappyJoy]

He can't get close enough to Trump and the establishment doesn't want him.

You're you're implying that Trump and the establishment are collaborating with one another? So why is the establishment so afraid of him?

What plane of reality are you from?

You're studdering.

I don't think Trump is collaborating with anyone. I think Cruz is working very closely in the same lane as Trump (anti-establishment) with more than a tinge of religious fervor. Trump basically moved into birtherism and then latched onto religious moron Sarah Palin. Both of these things are important to Iowan wingnuts, combined with Trumps attacks on Cruz seniors religion and Cruz falling to second place in Iowa polls spells more than just a little trouble for Teddy. Lastly the Iowa Republican governor just endorsed anyone but Cruz. He's kind of fucked.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The majority of republicans have every right to oppose Trump's candidacy, to oppose his ignorance and bigotry they believe don't represent the GOP, to oppose him because they correctly understand he'll lose the GE, where such opposition by a majority of republicans in no way renders them 'RINOs.'

Wow, what a brilliant political analysis from CCJ! And if someone supports Trump, what does that make them? An outcast?

Do you understand what happens when we start playing the game of labeling people for whom they support and who they don't?

 

[HappyJoy]

he's done and the nail in his coffin is the Palin endorsement.

Thanks for making my case.

You're welcome but you really don't have one.

Okay, so how do I not have a case? Explain.

Because you haven't made one.

That's not an answer.

I can't invent a case for you.

 

[HappyJoy]

The majority of republicans have every right to oppose Trump's candidacy, to oppose his ignorance and bigotry they believe don't represent the GOP, to oppose him because they correctly understand he'll lose the GE, where such opposition by a majority of republicans in no way renders them 'RINOs.'

Wow, what a brilliant political analysis from CCJ! And if someone supports Trump, what does that make them? An outcast?

Do you understand what happens when we start playing the game of labeling people for whom they support and who they don't?

Yeah, it's mostly called Democrats and Republicans.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You're studdering.

That's "stuttering."

religious moron Sarah Palin.

Stop. People don't like it when someone labels someone else for being gay, or black... but you're willing to call someone a "religious moron?" Just what is it you have against religious people, huh?

Both of these things are important to Iowan wingnuts

See, there you go again. Tolerance much?

Lastly the Iowa Republican governor just endorsed anyone but Cruz. He's kind of fucked.

You're talking to a Trump supporter. Cruz's little quip about "New York values" insulted a lot of New Yorkers that night. Palin's endorsement will hurt Cruz's campaign.