What does the current iteration of conservatives have in common with fascism?

[whitehall]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services. Which side of the political equation illustrates fascism? That's right, the democrat party and it's cousin the socialist idiots. The left wing has almost total control over the media and they whine about Fox and a couple of talk radio programs. The democrats give people a choice between an old commie who wants government total control or an abused woman who spent her entire adult life covering up her husband's sexist abuse of women. You almost gotta laugh when lefties claim the "arts" are suppressed when an art show in NY featured the desecration of Christian icons.

 

[Contumacious]

I said that it was a BRANCH of socialism -

This forum is NOT the venue to educate nitwits.......Believe what you want and try not to breed more idiots.

This forum is NOT the venue to educate nitwits.. but I'll make an exception

Fascism is a Form Of Socialism

.

 

[Contumacious]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services. Which side of the political equation illustrates fascism? That's right, the democrat party and it's cousin the socialist idiots. The left wing has almost total control over the media and they whine about Fox and a couple of talk radio programs. The democrats give people a choice between an old commie who wants government total control or an abused woman who spent her entire adult life covering up her husband's sexist abuse of women. You almost gotta laugh when lefties claim the "arts" are suppressed when an art show in NY featured the desecration of Christian icons.

...The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone....

Benito Mussolini

 

[The Rabbi]

Virtually all the same talking points:

Jacobin Reason: Sneak Peek at the 2016 GOP Platform

Yep.....we've seen a perfect example of this at every GOP debate.......

Family Values
"The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and co-operation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life."[6]

No one is so blind as those who will not see. These are the facts:

• In terms of ideology, the New Right (crazy right wingers) have more in common with radical Islam than with our Founding Principles
• Bigotry has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by the New Right (the CRW)
• Prejudice has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by members of the New Right (CRW)
• Fear seems to be the instrument driving hate, fear being a product of ignorance and an emotion which clouds rational thinking
• The truth may set us free, but the New Right believes truth to be an agenda for change, which creates in them fear and thus hate for anyone who advocates new ideas, new solutions to long term problems and of course a Supreme Court open to the realities of the 21st Century.

Exactly - fear of change, diversity, and dissent; typical of most on the reactionary, authoritarian right.

Here are some fascists of the authoritarian right exhibiting fear of diversity and dissent.

 

[The Rabbi]

No one is so blind as those who will not see. These are the facts:

• In terms of ideology, the New Right (crazy right wingers) have more in common with radical Islam than with our Founding Principles

Izzatrite, Herr Goebbels?

Or are you just spewing the most outrageous slander and libel that you (rather the hate site doing your thinking for you ) can concoct?

I get it, you are using the "big lie" technique, the more outrageous your lies, the more likely they will be believed.

No doubt Republicans have horns and make Matzo from the blood of good little Communist children.

You are so unique, Herr Goebbels.

• Bigotry has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by the New Right (the CRW)

Allah knows we have nothing but love from you, Herr Goebbels.

When you spew this kind of vile shit, it's because you love opposing views and want to demonstrate that love through Gulags, forced labor camps, and death chambers.

You're practically Jesus in your capacity to love... Nah, but you ARE close to Pol Pot.

• Prejudice has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by members of the New Right (CRW)

So, have you thought more about the final solution to the white problem, Herr Goebbels?

• Fear seems to be the instrument driving hate, fear being a product of ignorance and an emotion which clouds rational thinking

Your fear and hatred of Christians, is it driven by anything tangible? I mean, did a bunch of Methodist kids beat you up and take your lunch foodstamps when you were just a wee Bolshevik?

• The truth may set us free, but the New Right believes truth to be an agenda for change, which creates in them fear and thus hate for anyone who advocates new ideas, new solutions to long term problems and of course a Supreme Court open to the realities of the 21st Century.

"Truth" being defined as "that which serves the party."

Thanks Herr Goebbels, your little hatenanny well demonstrates the depths of depravity that drive you and the other leftist in your quest to utterly crush the Constitutional Republic and civil liberty.

CumCatcher is like the Baghdad Bob of this forum. The more people post evidence he is lying and misinformed the more he insists he is right.

 

[Agit8r]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Hell, they even privatized public welfare:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk... to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)

 

[The Rabbi]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services.

View attachment 69631


http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Hell, they even privatized public welfare:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk... to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)

Another low information low intelligence poster spotted.
Hint: One sentence from Adolph Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin does not prove anything.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Virtually all the same talking points:

Jacobin Reason: Sneak Peek at the 2016 GOP Platform

Yep.....we've seen a perfect example of this at every GOP debate.......

Family Values
"The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and co-operation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life."[6]

No one is so blind as those who will not see. These are the facts:

• In terms of ideology, the New Right (crazy right wingers) have more in common with radical Islam than with our Founding Principles
• Bigotry has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by the New Right (the CRW)
• Prejudice has devolved into hate, and has become the new norm by members of the New Right (CRW)
• Fear seems to be the instrument driving hate, fear being a product of ignorance and an emotion which clouds rational thinking
• The truth may set us free, but the New Right believes truth to be an agenda for change, which creates in them fear and thus hate for anyone who advocates new ideas, new solutions to long term problems and of course a Supreme Court open to the realities of the 21st Century.

Look at all these fascist conservatives acting like the Taliban.

As expected, the racist homophobic insensitive Rabbi(t) once agains misconstrues an issue to fulfill his agenda. Since he fails to put context into his iniquitous judgment one must conclude once again that his posts are callow at best.

 

[Agit8r]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services.

View attachment 69631


http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Hell, they even privatized public welfare:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk... to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)

Another low information low intelligence poster spotted.
Hint: One sentence from Adolph Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin does not prove anything.

That is why there are links in the post.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services.

View attachment 69631


http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Hell, they even privatized public welfare:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk... to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)

Another low information low intelligence poster spotted.
Hint: One sentence from Adolph Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin does not prove anything.

In the context of his post it proves a good deal, that you're too dishonest to admit that, and too stupid to write a serious rebuttal, we can conclude you are a mendacious fool.

 

[The Rabbi]

There are a hundred things wrong with the low information whiny hypothesis. First of all, fascism is generally defined as government control over the production and distribution of goods and services.

View attachment 69631


http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Hell, they even privatized public welfare:

"The Winterhilfswerk... was to call on the Volk to help itself. We could have done things differently. Instead of appealing to the Volk's willingness to sacrifice, we could have directed our appeal to the taxpayer. We consciously and deliberately did not do so because we wanted to educate the German Volk... to comprehend the duties this community demands of us and to satisfy these of our own free accord without relying on the taxpayer."
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech at Berlin Sportpalast (October 10, 1939)

Another low information low intelligence poster spotted.
Hint: One sentence from Adolph Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin does not prove anything.

In the context of his post it proves a good deal, that you're too dishonest to admit that, and too stupid to write a serious rebuttal, we can conclude you are a mendacious fool.

Hiting the thesaurus before noon, again?

 

[Agit8r]

Italy’s first Fascist government applied a large-scale privatization policy between 1922 and 1925. The government privatized the state monopoly of match sale, eliminated the State monopoly on life insurances, sold most of the State-owned telephone networks and services to private firms, reprivatized the largest metal machinery producer, and awarded concessions to private firms to build and operate motorways. These interventions represent one of the earliest and most decisive privatization episodes in the Western world. While ideological considerations may have had a certain influence, privatization was used mainly as a political tool to build confidence among industrialists and to increase support for the government and the Partito Nazionale Fascista. Privatization also contributed to balancing the budget, which was the core objective of Fascist economic policy in its first phase.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/bel_Italy_fascist.pdf

 

[Agit8r]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

 

[The Rabbi]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

It's like Adolph Hitler was the 20th century version of George Bush!

 

[Agit8r]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

It's like Adolph Hitler was the 20th century version of George Bush!

Except for the whole Holocaust thing...

Wait, didn't Bush nationalize airport security?

 

[Uncensored2008]

This forum is NOT the venue to educate nitwits.......Believe what you want and try not to breed more idiots.

No one is trying to educate you, we're just exposing your ignorance and dishonesty.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

It's like Adolph Hitler was the 20th century version of George Bush!

Except for the whole Holocaust thing...

Wait, didn't Bush nationalize airport security?

Yeah, he did. He also created more govt, HS. O came along after that and nationalized healthcare. Theyre both doucheheads.

 

[basquebromance]

Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized Alinsky in her thesis about him that he failed to build up a national movement based on his ideas. But she hasn't given up the faith. She hasn't given up the faith. She hasn't given up the faith. She's remained true to her RADICAL PRINCIPLES. At Yale, she quickly fell in with the leftist fascist fringe.

Hillary Rodham Clinton helped edit the Yale Review of Law and Social Action, which at the time was a thoroughly radical fascist paper supporting the Black Panthers and publishing articles implicitly endorsing the murder of police. One article, "Jamestown Seventy", suggested that radicals adopt a program of "political migration to a single state for the purpose of gaining political control and establishing a living laboratory for experiment". An infamous cover depicted police as pigs, one with his head chopped off.

Hillary Rodham Clinton's volunteered to help the Panthers' legal team in a case, even attending the trial to take notes to help with the defense. She did such a good job of organizing the student volunteers that she was offered a summer internship in the offices of Rob Treuhaft. Treuhaft was a lifelong member of the American Communist Party who had cut his teeth fighting for the Stalinist faction in the California labor movement.

Hillary Rodham Clinton's love of hard men like Castro & Che is clearly tied to her obsession with the fascist values of authenticity and will.

 

[The Rabbi]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

It's like Adolph Hitler was the 20th century version of George Bush!

Except for the whole Holocaust thing...

Wait, didn't Bush nationalize airport security?

The Iraqi people would disagree.

Factually it was Congress that created TSA.

 

[Agit8r]

...the Nazi regime transferred public ownership and public services to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in the Western capitalist countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization in Nazi Germany was also unique in transferring to private hands the delivery of public services previously provided by government. The firms and the services transferred to private ownership belonged to diverse sectors. Privatization was part of an intentional policy with multiple objectives and was not ideologically driven. As in many recent privatizations, particularly within the European Union, strong financial restrictions were a central motivation. In addition, privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party.

http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

It's like Adolph Hitler was the 20th century version of George Bush!

Except for the whole Holocaust thing...

Wait, didn't Bush nationalize airport security?

Yeah, he did. He also created more govt, HS. O came along after that and nationalized healthcare. Theyre both doucheheads.

And there is the whole subsidized airline insurance that started around that same time. And the Freddie and Fannie stuff...

Suffice to say that Bush isn't right wing enough for today's "conservatives"