Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
by all means, TELL US what YOU think happened....breaking into a secure server is a crime, looking at data on an unsecure server is not.
The DNC servers could be looked at by anyone with a little computer savvy. They were virtually open to the world.
Hacking them was still a crime. Using the stolen data is a crime. Offering to accept stolen property, whether you actually receive the stolen property is a crime.
So you want to convict Russia of a crime?
We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
Imagine that. LOLbreaking into a secure server is a crime, looking at data on an unsecure server is not.
The DNC servers could be looked at by anyone with a little computer savvy. They were virtually open to the world.
Hacking them was still a crime. Using the stolen data is a crime. Offering to accept stolen property, whether you actually receive the stolen property is a crime.
So you want to convict Russia of a crime?
We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
Come on HereWeGoAgain! You're killing me with the suspense. What happened? Was it this?
U.S. judge rejects firm's bid to see grand jury material in Russia...
That is illegal the defense is REQUIRED by our system of law to get FULL disclosure.We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
Come on HereWeGoAgain! You're killing me with the suspense. What happened? Was it this?
U.S. judge rejects firm's bid to see grand jury material in Russia...
Seems as if you already know.
Mewler couldnt deliver.
You read that wrong, darlin'. The bad guys (Russians) lost in court to the good guys, the U.S.
Not "couldn't", didn't have to...
Which is ILLEGAL the defense is entitled to FULL disclosure in the United States Legal system.That is illegal the defense is REQUIRED by our system of law to get FULL disclosure.The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
Come on HereWeGoAgain! You're killing me with the suspense. What happened? Was it this?
U.S. judge rejects firm's bid to see grand jury material in Russia...
Seems as if you already know.
Mewler couldnt deliver.
You read that wrong, darlin'. The bad guys (Russians) lost in court to the good guys, the U.S.
Not "couldn't", didn't have to...
Obviously not. The judge ruled against their motion.
Well, if you read or watched real news instead of the pseudocons propagandists you digest, you'd be better informed.We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
Well, if you read or watched real news instead of the pseudocons propagandists you digest, you'd be better informed.We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
It can't be helped your propagandists keep you in the dark.
How many times have I asked you not to get back in line for your piss cup to be refilled? Did you listen?
Nope!
So no wonder you started a topic to admit your total cluelessness!
Which is ILLEGAL the defense is entitled to FULL disclosure in the United States Legal system.That is illegal the defense is REQUIRED by our system of law to get FULL disclosure.Come on HereWeGoAgain! You're killing me with the suspense. What happened? Was it this?
U.S. judge rejects firm's bid to see grand jury material in Russia...
Seems as if you already know.
Mewler couldnt deliver.
You read that wrong, darlin'. The bad guys (Russians) lost in court to the good guys, the U.S.
Not "couldn't", didn't have to...
Obviously not. The judge ruled against their motion.
uhhhh, nope!by all means, TELL US what YOU think happened....Hacking them was still a crime. Using the stolen data is a crime. Offering to accept stolen property, whether you actually receive the stolen property is a crime.
So you want to convict Russia of a crime?
We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
You turds don't know ANYTHING. None of us do. You are doing nothing but spouting the bullshit from sources who say what you WANT to believe.
Wrong, you lying douchebag, the judge was not told that the Clinton campaign paid for the "dossier."IrrelevantI understand Hillary did not fabricate the dossier, although she paid for it....in more ways than one. I also understand she didn't wipe down her server, not even with a cloth, but she sure as hell paid for someone to do it. Which holds her responsible.
If Hillary funded the dossier, why didn’t she use it?
Trump repeatedly used the information provided by Putin
She is using it, dumbass. Why do you think we have this witchhunt?
The investigation began in july and the warrant wasn't granted until oct, you QTARD fuckwit.
the FISA warrants used the lies in the dossier as their justification, the FISA judge was lied to.
Liar.
The application has been released. It says quite clealy what the judge was informed about, dope.
We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
uhhhh, nope!by all means, TELL US what YOU think happened....So you want to convict Russia of a crime?
We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
The Russian lawyers showed up and asked for discovery...then guess what happened?
You turds don't know ANYTHING. None of us do. You are doing nothing but spouting the bullshit from sources who say what you WANT to believe.
that is precisely what you trumpsters are doing! look in the mirror!
What is garnered by looking at the server is whether it was hacked or not. The FBI has no hard evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. Furthermore, we have no idea whether the information in the indictment is true. We have only the FBI's say-so on that. In other words, we got nothing.Anyone who doesn't have hole in his head says they needed to.The FBI did not examine the server. that was left to a firm getting paid by the Hillary campaign. Nothing they say can be believed.Actually, they did. They turned everything over to third-party contractors who already had a working relationship and contracts with US Intelligence agencies. They, in turn, gave their findings to US intelligence and the FBI. Makes no difference how many times you are informed about the facts, you and your ilk will keep parroting the talking point designed to mislead and distort.Stupid far left drone!
Show in the quote you spammed, where Trump said it was by the Russians?
Also the far left drone misses the point that the DNC never handed over their servers..
Who says they needed to, dope?
Obviously you have a rather large hole as the indictments have names, dates, methods, financing and distribution of the hacking operation, none of which would have been garnered from looking at the servers, dope.
/——-/ Hildabeast lost on her own acccord so naturally she had to blame someone and the Russians were an easy target.We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
plus it does limit their travel to other countries.... who are our friendlies, that we have extradition agreements with, and it also limits their banking activities throughout the world as well, from what I understand....the only problem is that not one of you has answered the basic question. So they got into the DNC servers---not illegal, so they bought a few thousand dollars of facebook ads---------not illegal. How many votes were changed? Tell us or STFU.
If the Russians had a goal it was to divide us and get us screaming at each other, in that they succeeded---------again not illegal.
What was illegal under US law, however, was Obama trying to influence the brexit vote and the Israeli elections, but you don't care about that because you worship the Kenyan messiah over all else.the only problem is that not one of you has answered the basic question. So they got into the DNC servers---not illegal,
Another lie.
Hacking is a felony, dope.
breaking into a secure server is a crime, looking at data on an unsecure server is not.
The DNC servers could be looked at by anyone with a little computer savvy. They were virtually open to the world.
Hacking them was still a crime. Using the stolen data is a crime. Offering to accept stolen property, whether you actually receive the stolen property is a crime.
So you want to convict Russia of a crime?
We've already indicated some of the Russians involved. While they may never be convicted, the indictment matters, especially if we find out about U.S.help.
They opened emails in Hillary's already open unpassworded serverWe keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all. They claim some Russians broke into Hillary's server, perhaps she should have had some security? They claim the Russians broke into Podesta server perhaps he should have had some security?We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
Read the latest indicments, dope.
Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.
The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all.
Indictments aren’t evidence didn’t you hear judge Ellis?We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
Read the latest indicments, dope.
Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.
The formed a political group and spent money on Facebook ads.We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
indictments are not evidence. just saying you should listen to judges when they speak. ask judge Ellis.Anyone who doesn't have hole in his head says they needed to.The FBI did not examine the server. that was left to a firm getting paid by the Hillary campaign. Nothing they say can be believed.Actually, they did. They turned everything over to third-party contractors who already had a working relationship and contracts with US Intelligence agencies. They, in turn, gave their findings to US intelligence and the FBI. Makes no difference how many times you are informed about the facts, you and your ilk will keep parroting the talking point designed to mislead and distort.
Who says they needed to, dope?
Obviously you have a rather large hole as the indictments have names, dates, methods, financing and distribution of the hacking operation, none of which would have been garnered from looking at the servers, dope.
