What's wrong with smart guns?

[Brain357]

You are one of the people always claiming guns aren't even fired in defense. Are you now claiming they are often fired in defense? Is that something you really want to do?

When were 12 million people murdered by Europeans?

No. He claims the MAJORITY of them are not fired. You, being the dishonest debater that you are misrepresent what he says. Why is that? Are you simply not smart enough to engage in a discussion without lying?

Yes the vast majority don't even require firing. That is what he claims.

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

 

[2aguy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

And In Japan, South Korea and China their chances are 2x ours with a gun......so they still manage to kill themselves more often than we do and our gun suicide rate is going down.....in a country with over 357 million guns in private hands....

Our gun suicide rate is going down, not up....as more of us own and carry guns...explain that....

 

[westwall]

No. He claims the MAJORITY of them are not fired. You, being the dishonest debater that you are misrepresent what he says. Why is that? Are you simply not smart enough to engage in a discussion without lying?

Yes the vast majority don't even require firing. That is what he claims.

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

Your link is wildly optimistic. The best rate tested by a non biased source is 90% reliable. And that company is now out of business.

 

[2aguy]

No. He claims the MAJORITY of them are not fired. You, being the dishonest debater that you are misrepresent what he says. Why is that? Are you simply not smart enough to engage in a discussion without lying?

Yes the vast majority don't even require firing. That is what he claims.

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

and the people raped, robbed, and murdered did not carry a gun an were not fine.........they aren't as blessed as you brain.

 

[HappyJoy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

 

[2aguy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

except for the methods used by the Japanese, South Koreans and Chinese...who don't use guns at all...and manage to commit suicide at 2x our rate...........jumping in front of a train is just as effective and a lot messier....

I know, it's exactly how we don't do it here.

I'm think 30%. People who use their guns equals about 30% of people who jump into a car on a daily basis. Sound fair?

It doesn't matter......people will commit suicide with whatever they need to...as Japan, South Korea and China show..a.nd they arent' the only countries with strict to absolute gun control with higher suicide rates....

and our gun suicide rate is going down...as more Americans own guns....it is not a gun issue...it is a mental health issue...fix that, leave gun owners alone.

 

[2aguy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

Except in Japan, South Korea and China....they have absolute gun control....and higher suicide rates......take away guns and people will still commit suicide...you do realize that 19,000 people in this country committed suicide without guns...right?

 

[HappyJoy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

And In Japan, South Korea and China their chances are 2x ours with a gun......so they still manage to kill themselves more often than we do and our gun suicide rate is going down.....in a country with over 357 million guns in private hands....

Our gun suicide rate is going down, not up....as more of us own and carry guns...explain that....

Yep.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

Guns make suicide more likely here in the good ol' USofA

 

[westwall]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

 

[2aguy]

I think that there is a link between suicide and fast trains in Japan.....and tall buildings....and home chemicals....

Did you know that the most popular method of suicide around the world...including countries with strict gun control...is the rope?

 

[Brain357]

Yes the vast majority don't even require firing. That is what he claims.

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

Your link is wildly optimistic. The best rate tested by a non biased source is 90% reliable. And that company is now out of business.

Even using your 90% number you are still quite safe. You are first very unlikely to be attacked in some way. Second your are extremely unlikely to need to fire a gun. And last you still have 90% chance it will fire. You are so scared that isn't enough for you? Are you a little bunny?

What is your non biased source?

 

[HappyJoy]

And, btw, gun suicide is by far more successful than any other attempt.

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

I don't know, that's your point to prove.

In the meantime, read the link. States with lax gun law are really good at offing themselves.

 

[Brain357]

Yes the vast majority don't even require firing. That is what he claims.

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

and the people raped, robbed, and murdered did not carry a gun an were not fine.........they aren't as blessed as you brain.

Many did carry a gun and were not fine. Go figure.

 

[westwall]

And that is factual. My one defensive gun use here in the USA did not require me to shoot the idiot trying to break down my hotel door. I didn't even need to point it at him. I merely showed him that I had one and he left.

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

Your link is wildly optimistic. The best rate tested by a non biased source is 90% reliable. And that company is now out of business.

Even using your 90% number you are still quite safe. You are first very unlikely to be attacked in some way. Second your are extremely unlikely to need to fire a gun. And last you still have 90% chance it will fire. You are so scared that isn't enough for you? Are you a little bunny?

What is your non biased source?

Bullshit. Take ten cookies. Coat one with cyanide. Place in bowl and have someone else mix them. Choose one and eat it. An intellectually honest person would agree that those are not favorable odds WITH YOUR LIFE!

But we know that you are not intellectually honest so have fun with your retarded circle jerk.

 

[westwall]

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

I don't know, that's your point to prove.

In the meantime, read the link. States with lax gun law are really good at offing themselves.

No. That is a fact. That is a fact that blows your contention right out of the water.

 

[2aguy]

See...you lefty anti gunners are all giddy when someone gets a doctor to help them commit suicide...but get all agitated if they do it with a gun.....

Hmmm.....would you feel better if they got a doctor to shoot them....would that make you feel better?

 

[2aguy]

Yes, it is. And I would rather they kill just themselves than jump off of a building and land on someone, or crash their car into a group of people or slam their airliner into a mountain. Wouldn't you? Besides, progressives the world over are fighting like hell to legalize doctor assisted suicide. What's the difference? They are in pain and they want to stop it. Do they not have the right to end their own lives?

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

I don't know, that's your point to prove.

In the meantime, read the link. States with lax gun law are really good at offing themselves.

And Japanese, South Koreans, Chinese and Scandinavians are really good at offing themselves without guns.....better than we are with guns.........just another thing foreigners do better than Americans...thanks obama....

 

[HappyJoy]

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

I don't know, that's your point to prove.

In the meantime, read the link. States with lax gun law are really good at offing themselves.

No. That is a fact. That is a fact that blows your contention right out of the water.

What is? And why the awkward spacing in your posts?

Japan has a culture of suicide. Wyoming has a culture of suicide compared to other US states.

The US is projected this year to have more gun deaths than auto deaths. That's not good, driving is one of the most dangerous activities Americans partake in on a daily basis.

 

[HappyJoy]

I'd prefer they just fail to kill themselves and without a gun chances are they will.

hasn't seemed to work with the Japanese or the Scandinavians.

Yep, but in states with lax gun laws suicide rates are higher.

Guns and suicide: A fatal link

So? Explain to me how the Japanese and the Scandinavians have higher suicide rates than us without guns.

I don't know, that's your point to prove.

In the meantime, read the link. States with lax gun law are really good at offing themselves.

And Japanese, South Koreans, Chinese and Scandinavians are really good at offing themselves without guns.....better than we are with guns.........just another thing foreigners do better than Americans...thanks obama....

And? We dont' have the highest suicide rate. But our suicide rate is where it is due in part to the number of guns we have and how wreckless we are with them.

 

[Brain357]

So then you could have had a smart gun and been fine. Thank you, that is my point.

You really are a retard aren't you. What happens when the bad guy decides he isn't going to stop? Hmmm?

Well that is very unlikely to happen. And as the link I posted showed smart guns are over 99% so you would still be fine. Me and most the people I know do not carry a gun and have been fine. Stop being so scared.

Your link is wildly optimistic. The best rate tested by a non biased source is 90% reliable. And that company is now out of business.

Even using your 90% number you are still quite safe. You are first very unlikely to be attacked in some way. Second your are extremely unlikely to need to fire a gun. And last you still have 90% chance it will fire. You are so scared that isn't enough for you? Are you a little bunny?

What is your non biased source?

Bullshit. Take ten cookies. Coat one with cyanide. Place in bowl and have someone else mix them. Choose one and eat it. An intellectually honest person would agree that those are not favorable odds WITH YOUR LIFE!

But we know that you are not intellectually honest so have fun with your retarded circle jerk.

Please. What percent do you put on you being attacked and needing to fire there little bunny? Why is it I know so many people that are completely unarmed and they aren't scared?