Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[Shusha]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

 

[P F Tinmore]

And Palestine was divided. Why are the Palestinians not freaking out about Jordan's occupation of "their" land?

Jordan did not kick them out of their land like Israel did.

No.....the Hashemites kicked the Jews out of TransJordan as Mohammad had done with them in the 7th century in Arabia.
No Jews are allowed to live in Arabia. That is one thing.
No Jews allowed to live on their own ancient homeland? That is theft.

Unrelated to Palestine.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

 

[Shusha]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

 

[Shusha]

Do the Palestinians have the right to all of Palestine?

I don't see that as a bizarre concept.

I don't either. How much more obvious can it be?

Neither is it a bizarre concept for the Jewish people to have rights to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

 

[abi]

Neither is it a bizarre concept for the Jewish people to have rights to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland.

Is it a bizarre concept for the zionist people to have rights to Palestine?

 

[Shusha]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

Can Palestine sign a treaty with Israel? Yes or no? Is it possible for Palestine to enter into an international agreement with another sovereign State? Yes or no?

Can that treaty delineate borders between their two States? Yes or no?

 

[JoelT1]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

You need to read a history book. Palestine was a Roman name for ancient Israel, later, Britain’s name for the British Mandate which ceased to exist in 1948 with Israeli statehood

Palestine is not Arab in origin In fact, there’s no letter p in Arabic

 

[Shusha]

Neither is it a bizarre concept for the Jewish people to have rights to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland.

Is it a bizarre concept for the zionist people to have rights to Palestine?

Forget about "zionists" for the moment. The Jewish people. Do they or do they not have the rights to self-determination and sovereignty on their ancestral and historical homeland? Yes or no?

 

[JoelT1]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

Eminent Muslim scholar acknowledges palestine originated as a Roman name imposed on Jews’ land

 

[abi]

Forget about "zionists" for the moment. The Jewish people. Do they or do they not have the rights to self-determination and sovereignty on their ancestral and historical homeland? Yes or no?

That's your problem. You can't forget about that. And furthermore, for the umpteenth time, most Jews don't live in Israel, over 1/4 that do wish to leave, but can't, and Jewish people have been speaking out against Israel since before her creation and continue to up til this very day.

Please stop speaking for all of us. Many Jews find the zionists the greatest threat to Judaism. This has been stated since Israel was a thought and include Rabbinical opinions from multiple sects.

 

[Shusha]

That's your problem. You can't forget about that.

Sure you can. The Jewish people are a people. They originated in the territory in question. That is their ancestral and historical homeland. Do you dispute this?

If you want, take away all the people that you don't think are "real" Jews and just talk about the real ones.

Do the "real" Jews have a right to self-determination and sovereignty on their ancestral and historical homeland? Its a real simple yes or no question.

 

[JoelT1]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

Palestine was a name imposed on Jews’ land by Roman occupiers, about 2000 years ago, reflecting its ancient Jewish heritage and history

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

You need to read a history book. Palestine was a Roman name for ancient Israel, later, Britain’s name for the British Mandate which ceased to exist in 1948 with Israeli statehood

Palestine is not Arab in origin In fact, there’s no letter p in Arabic

Thank you Mr. BS Israeli talking points.

 

[Hollie]

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

You need to read a history book. Palestine was a Roman name for ancient Israel, later, Britain’s name for the British Mandate which ceased to exist in 1948 with Israeli statehood

Palestine is not Arab in origin In fact, there’s no letter p in Arabic

Thank you Mr. BS Israeli talking points.

Indeed, you always lose this argument, yet here you are, losing again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not unless it is part of a treaty with Palestine.

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

Can Palestine sign a treaty with Israel? Yes or no? Is it possible for Palestine to enter into an international agreement with another sovereign State? Yes or no?

Can that treaty delineate borders between their two States? Yes or no?

Good questions. Why don't you look that up and report what you find?

 

[Shusha]

Good questions. Why don't you look that up and report what you find?

Got nothing, huh?

Come on. The BASIS for international law is the idea treaties between States. Surely you are not going to argue that this does not apply to "Palestine"?

 

[Hollie]

Somewhere in Fatah’istan there a fatwa pen is scratching out an islamo-hit on the (soon to be known as the former) Abd “Dead Man Walking” Al-Ghani Salameh,




PA historian: In 1917 “there was nothing called a Palestinian people” - PMW Bulletins

PA historian: In 1917
"there was nothing called a Palestinian people"

Itamar Marcus and Maurice Hirsch
To mark the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority published an op-ed in the British Guardian newspaper. After castigating Lord Balfour for promising "a land that was not his to promise" he went on to describe the Palestinian people as "a proud nation with a rich heritage of ancient civilisations, and the cradle of the Abrahamic faiths."

Contradicting Abbas' historical revision, just a day before, PA official TV broadcast an interview with the historian Abd Al-Ghani Salameh, who explained that in 1917 there was no Palestinian people.

 

[JoelT1]

THANK YOU! (You mean like Oslo?) Can we get ON with it then?

Oslo is not a valid treaty.

Odd little catch-22 you have set up there. Palestine can be divided as long as there is a treaty which Palestine agrees to. But any treaty which Palestine agrees to is not valid.

You need to read up on occupation and treaty law.

You need to read a history book. Palestine was a Roman name for ancient Israel, later, Britain’s name for the British Mandate which ceased to exist in 1948 with Israeli statehood

Palestine is not Arab in origin In fact, there’s no letter p in Arabic

Thank you Mr. BS Israeli talking points.

Eminent Muslim scholar, Encyclopedia of Islam: Palestine, Roman name imposed on Jews’ land