Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
When police officers in America shoot unarmed black people, Jewish hands lurk in the background — so says Linda Sarsour, perhaps the most visible Muslim political advocate in the United States. She was a co-chair of the national Women’s March, and is a campaign surrogate for politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

A program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that takes American police officials to Israel for a week-long seminar is fueling police brutality, Sarsour said earlier this month at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)’s annual convention.

“That [statement] is so horrific,” says Nisi Jacobs. Jacobs is a co-founder of the Women’s March for All, a group that broke away from the national Women’s March because of antisemitism concerns about Sarsour and national co-chair Tamika Mallory. Among its activities, Women’s March for All has circulated a petition calling on Sarsour and Mallory to be replaced.

“It’s [beyond] anti-Semitic,” Jacobs said. “She’s lying to a bunch of gullible, hurt people. She’s like a horrible guru that just lies because she has her own agenda.”

Assistant Police Chief Chris McIlvain of Austin, Texas, said that his experience of a 2015 ADL-sponsored seminar in Israel was “not even remotely” close to what Sarsour described.

There was no tactical training and no discussion of forceful or coercive techniques, he said. Police departments must maintain “a state of readiness” for all kinds of threats, from mass shootings to terrorist attacks. Israel has experience with these challenges that can be helpful to police departments in the US, which is why the trip was organized.

“The ADL is a good partner of law enforcement combating hate crimes of all types,” McIlvain said. “The idea is not to divert hate from one group to another; it’s to eliminate it.”

(full article online)

Linda Sarsour’s Blood Libel
 
The Arab-Moslem Death Cult is just boiling over with clever ideas. These idiots are little more than a criminal organization.

I’m thinking that Israel might unleash a really punishing military response if it’s citizens begin to disappear or worse, if the Islamic terrorists leave bodies of Israelis in the streets.



subcat-box-top.gif

PMW Bulletins
Fatah TV host anticipates taking Israelis hostage to "release our captives"
by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik
Sept. 26, 2018

Fatah TV host anticipates taking Israelis hostage to "release our captives" - PMW Bulletins

Share |

By Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Commemorating the anniversary of the capture of 8 Israeli soldiers and holding them hostage in Lebanon in 1982, until Israel released 5,900 Palestinian and Arab terrorists from Israeli prisons, a Fatah TV host expressed his wish for a similar "operation" to "release our captives" - i.e., terrorists and murderers sitting in Israeli prisons.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Government of Palestine (British Administration under the agreement by the Allied Powers) agreed upon in the 1920 San Remo Convention, came into existence. The Allied Powers made all the determination pertaining to citizenship and nationality. Prior to the Year End Repost of 1923, three attempts were made to establish an institution through which the Arab population had an influence within the Government of Palestine. However, the High Commissioner could not persuade the Arab Higher Committee (AHC) to participate and cooperate with the government.

From 1922 until the termination of the Mandate, the High Commissioner exercised Governance over Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials; the Arab having decided to participate in the establishment of self-governing institutions.

The Mandatory Power (High Commissioner) proposed “the establishment of an "Arab Agency" in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency.” Establishing the historical behavior of uncooperative politics, the AHC declined.

Palestine came into existence and the Palestinians became citizens of Palestine in 1924. Palestinian became a nationality inside a territory defined by international borders. A people do not need permission to declare statehood. If so, who has the authority to grant or deny that permission? About 80 local Palestinian officials declared independence on their own land inside their own international borders in 1948. It was all perfectly legal. Nobody has the authority to undo that.
(COMMENT)

The Sykes-Picot Agreement, establishing the Boundary between the French Zone "A" and the British Zone "B." This boundary was generalized in 1916 but the final demarcation was not the established until the Paulet–Newcombe Line was agreed upon.

• In 1920 "Franco-British Convention pertained to the boundaries pertaining to the boundaries between the Mandates for Syria and the Lebanon, Palestine.

• The formal demarcation was not completed soleybetween the French and British Goverments until 1923 in the establishment of the Paulet–Newcombe Line; with the boundaries related to the Mandates of Palestine, Mesopotamia and Syria.

This claim is nonsense. There was NO creation of some self-governing nation, for the former Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) population of local inhabitance, out of territory renounced by the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. --- That territory (under Article 16) was relinquished in favor of the Allied Powers covering the future of these territories (and islands) being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned (parties to the treaty, of which there was no Arab Palestinian representation).

The term "Palestine," in from 1922 through 1948, was defined as "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine."

The Arab Palestinian today, wants you to think (erroneously) that the territory West of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and South of the 2000 Demarcation to the Sinai Desert belongs to them.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
When police officers in America shoot unarmed black people, Jewish hands lurk in the background — so says Linda Sarsour, perhaps the most visible Muslim political advocate in the United States. She was a co-chair of the national Women’s March, and is a campaign surrogate for politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

A program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that takes American police officials to Israel for a week-long seminar is fueling police brutality, Sarsour said earlier this month at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)’s annual convention.

“That [statement] is so horrific,” says Nisi Jacobs. Jacobs is a co-founder of the Women’s March for All, a group that broke away from the national Women’s March because of antisemitism concerns about Sarsour and national co-chair Tamika Mallory. Among its activities, Women’s March for All has circulated a petition calling on Sarsour and Mallory to be replaced.

“It’s [beyond] anti-Semitic,” Jacobs said. “She’s lying to a bunch of gullible, hurt people. She’s like a horrible guru that just lies because she has her own agenda.”

Assistant Police Chief Chris McIlvain of Austin, Texas, said that his experience of a 2015 ADL-sponsored seminar in Israel was “not even remotely” close to what Sarsour described.

There was no tactical training and no discussion of forceful or coercive techniques, he said. Police departments must maintain “a state of readiness” for all kinds of threats, from mass shootings to terrorist attacks. Israel has experience with these challenges that can be helpful to police departments in the US, which is why the trip was organized.

“The ADL is a good partner of law enforcement combating hate crimes of all types,” McIlvain said. “The idea is not to divert hate from one group to another; it’s to eliminate it.”

(full article online)

Linda Sarsour’s Blood Libel
 
When police officers in America shoot unarmed black people, Jewish hands lurk in the background — so says Linda Sarsour, perhaps the most visible Muslim political advocate in the United States. She was a co-chair of the national Women’s March, and is a campaign surrogate for politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

A program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that takes American police officials to Israel for a week-long seminar is fueling police brutality, Sarsour said earlier this month at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)’s annual convention.

“That [statement] is so horrific,” says Nisi Jacobs. Jacobs is a co-founder of the Women’s March for All, a group that broke away from the national Women’s March because of antisemitism concerns about Sarsour and national co-chair Tamika Mallory. Among its activities, Women’s March for All has circulated a petition calling on Sarsour and Mallory to be replaced.

“It’s [beyond] anti-Semitic,” Jacobs said. “She’s lying to a bunch of gullible, hurt people. She’s like a horrible guru that just lies because she has her own agenda.”

Assistant Police Chief Chris McIlvain of Austin, Texas, said that his experience of a 2015 ADL-sponsored seminar in Israel was “not even remotely” close to what Sarsour described.

There was no tactical training and no discussion of forceful or coercive techniques, he said. Police departments must maintain “a state of readiness” for all kinds of threats, from mass shootings to terrorist attacks. Israel has experience with these challenges that can be helpful to police departments in the US, which is why the trip was organized.

“The ADL is a good partner of law enforcement combating hate crimes of all types,” McIlvain said. “The idea is not to divert hate from one group to another; it’s to eliminate it.”

(full article online)

Linda Sarsour’s Blood Libel
 
The term "Palestine," in from 1922 through 1948, was defined as "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine."
Indeed, the Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate was not Palestine. Palestine existed separate from the Mandate and continued to exist after the Mandate left Palestine.

Nice smokescreen, though. This really does not address my post, as usual.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Government of Palestine (British Administration under the agreement by the Allied Powers) agreed upon in the 1920 San Remo Convention, came into existence. The Allied Powers made all the determination pertaining to citizenship and nationality. Prior to the Year End Repost of 1923, three attempts were made to establish an institution through which the Arab population had an influence within the Government of Palestine. However, the High Commissioner could not persuade the Arab Higher Committee (AHC) to participate and cooperate with the government.

From 1922 until the termination of the Mandate, the High Commissioner exercised Governance over Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials; the Arab having decided to participate in the establishment of self-governing institutions.

The Mandatory Power (High Commissioner) proposed “the establishment of an "Arab Agency" in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency.” Establishing the historical behavior of uncooperative politics, the AHC declined.

Palestine came into existence and the Palestinians became citizens of Palestine in 1924. Palestinian became a nationality inside a territory defined by international borders. A people do not need permission to declare statehood. If so, who has the authority to grant or deny that permission? About 80 local Palestinian officials declared independence on their own land inside their own international borders in 1948. It was all perfectly legal. Nobody has the authority to undo that.
(COMMENT)

The Sykes-Picot Agreement, establishing the Boundary between the French Zone "A" and the British Zone "B." This boundary was generalized in 1916 but the final demarcation was not the established until the Paulet–Newcombe Line was agreed upon.

• In 1920 "Franco-British Convention pertained to the boundaries pertaining to the boundaries between the Mandates for Syria and the Lebanon, Palestine.

• The formal demarcation was not completed soleybetween the French and British Goverments until 1923 in the establishment of the Paulet–Newcombe Line; with the boundaries related to the Mandates of Palestine, Mesopotamia and Syria.

This claim is nonsense. There was NO creation of some self-governing nation, for the former Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA) population of local inhabitance, out of territory renounced by the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. --- That territory (under Article 16) was relinquished in favor of the Allied Powers covering the future of these territories (and islands) being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned (parties to the treaty, of which there was no Arab Palestinian representation).

The term "Palestine," in from 1922 through 1948, was defined as "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine."

The Arab Palestinian today, wants you to think (erroneously) that the territory West of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and South of the 2000 Demarcation to the Sinai Desert belongs to them.

Most Respectfully,
R
ZIONISTS ARE SCUM
 
The term "Palestine," in from 1922 through 1948, was defined as "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine."
Indeed, the Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate was not Palestine. Palestine existed separate from the Mandate and continued to exist after the Mandate left Palestine.

Nice smokescreen, though. This really does not address my post, as usual.

Indeed, you are forever befuddled. The “Magical Kingdom of Disney Pal’istan” you have invented existed as a territory of the former Ottoman Empire.

Indeed, this schoolboy idea you have that the Islamic caliphate would last forever is quite silly. You forget that the Ottoman Empire collapsed from its own dead weight long before 1924.

Indeed!
 
When police officers in America shoot unarmed black people, Jewish hands lurk in the background — so says Linda Sarsour, perhaps the most visible Muslim political advocate in the United States. She was a co-chair of the national Women’s March, and is a campaign surrogate for politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

A program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that takes American police officials to Israel for a week-long seminar is fueling police brutality, Sarsour said earlier this month at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)’s annual convention.

“That [statement] is so horrific,” says Nisi Jacobs. Jacobs is a co-founder of the Women’s March for All, a group that broke away from the national Women’s March because of antisemitism concerns about Sarsour and national co-chair Tamika Mallory. Among its activities, Women’s March for All has circulated a petition calling on Sarsour and Mallory to be replaced.

“It’s [beyond] anti-Semitic,” Jacobs said. “She’s lying to a bunch of gullible, hurt people. She’s like a horrible guru that just lies because she has her own agenda.”

Assistant Police Chief Chris McIlvain of Austin, Texas, said that his experience of a 2015 ADL-sponsored seminar in Israel was “not even remotely” close to what Sarsour described.

There was no tactical training and no discussion of forceful or coercive techniques, he said. Police departments must maintain “a state of readiness” for all kinds of threats, from mass shootings to terrorist attacks. Israel has experience with these challenges that can be helpful to police departments in the US, which is why the trip was organized.

“The ADL is a good partner of law enforcement combating hate crimes of all types,” McIlvain said. “The idea is not to divert hate from one group to another; it’s to eliminate it.”

(full article online)

Linda Sarsour’s Blood Libel



Ahh, yes. The socialist and the Islamic fascist.

It seems these ladies have no concept of the misery and death that has accompanied socialism in the 20th century and the misery and death that has accompanied Islamic fascism since the 7th century.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The term "Palestine," in from 1922 through 1948, was defined as "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine."
Indeed, the Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate was not Palestine. Palestine existed separate from the Mandate and continued to exist after the Mandate left Palestine.

Nice smokescreen, though. This really does not address my post, as usual.
(COMMENT)

I look at this statement of yours and I see through the fog in it.

Yes, sure, the physics of says, the ground that might have been referred to as "Palestine" would still there, Mandate or not. BUT, without the Mandates, it might still be under the "Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA)." Remember, the occupation by the British Army of the Rhine (BAOR) lasted a decade after the Great War and then lasted a half century after WWII.

It is not at all clear that the Government or the territorial subdivisions would have been made at all. Any number of scenarios might have come to pass if the Mandates had not been established. Remember, at the end of WWII the British had effective control of all the territory from the Persian Frontier to the Mediterranean. The British might have divided the occupied expanse any number of ways. It is distinctly possible, absent the Mandates, that given a post-War era totally without Mandates, the 21st Century World of the Middle East, Persian Gulf and Central Asia might have been shaped entirely different. There might not even have been a Palestine at all. The people might have been called Assryian and the territroy might just as easily have been call Levant.

Your assertian that the Mandate for Palestine is not Palestine (with international borders), which BTW no one claimed (an allegation without substance), is undefined vapor politics.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
When police officers in America shoot unarmed black people, Jewish hands lurk in the background — so says Linda Sarsour, perhaps the most visible Muslim political advocate in the United States. She was a co-chair of the national Women’s March, and is a campaign surrogate for politicians, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

A program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that takes American police officials to Israel for a week-long seminar is fueling police brutality, Sarsour said earlier this month at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)’s annual convention.

“That [statement] is so horrific,” says Nisi Jacobs. Jacobs is a co-founder of the Women’s March for All, a group that broke away from the national Women’s March because of antisemitism concerns about Sarsour and national co-chair Tamika Mallory. Among its activities, Women’s March for All has circulated a petition calling on Sarsour and Mallory to be replaced.

“It’s [beyond] anti-Semitic,” Jacobs said. “She’s lying to a bunch of gullible, hurt people. She’s like a horrible guru that just lies because she has her own agenda.”

Assistant Police Chief Chris McIlvain of Austin, Texas, said that his experience of a 2015 ADL-sponsored seminar in Israel was “not even remotely” close to what Sarsour described.

There was no tactical training and no discussion of forceful or coercive techniques, he said. Police departments must maintain “a state of readiness” for all kinds of threats, from mass shootings to terrorist attacks. Israel has experience with these challenges that can be helpful to police departments in the US, which is why the trip was organized.

“The ADL is a good partner of law enforcement combating hate crimes of all types,” McIlvain said. “The idea is not to divert hate from one group to another; it’s to eliminate it.”

(full article online)

Linda Sarsour’s Blood Libel


A group that praises convicted murderers has a problem with police brutality?
Raises up lots of questions regarding their mental health :cuckoo:
 
So often, it seems as if the planet is standing by with casual indifference as a franchise of Islamic Terrorism Intl. Inc. exploits a dedicated welfare fraud to finance, support and promote death and destruction.



Abbas - a world leader in supporting terrorists


Abbas - a world leader in supporting terrorists - PMW Bulletins

By Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

As Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas takes the podium at the UN, it is important to remember that this man is a world leader in supporting terrorists.

The latest terrorist Abbas has chosen to honor specifically is Nasser Awais, a Palestinian serving 14 life sentences for murdering 14 people. Abbas decided to raise Awais to the rank of "major general" as "a sign of appreciation for his struggle and sacrifice for the homeland." [Official Fatah Facebook page, Sept. 9, 2018]

Announcing Abbas' decision to promote Awais, the Fatah Movement mentioned among Awais' accomplishments that he "established the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades in a direct appointment by [former PA] President Yasser Arafat." The US, Canada, the EU, and other countries have declared the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades a terror organization. The Brigades is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Israelis in suicide bombings.
 
The education of Palestinian schoolchildren must change drastically if there is ever to be a lasting negotiated peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. Why? Because these schools have been inciting three generations of young Palestinians to hate and kill Jews, and the only means of conflict resolution that these students have been exposed to is violence.

For children all over the world, the new school year is filled with promise and excitement, affording them the opportunity for personal development so that they may eventually become productive citizens of their perspective communities. The same cannot be said for Palestinian children. The United Nations’ Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA and the Palestinian leadership have manipulated their education system to serve a different purpose. Rather than an education that strives to better the child, they exploit impressionable minds, indoctrinating these children into a culture of hate, thereby perpetuating the conflict rather than resolving it. Until their education system changes, the region is at least a generation away from a true, sustainable peace.

Palestinian schools, including various private schools belonging to Christian churches and Islamic charity foundations, all receive their textbooks from the PA Ministry of Education’s Curricula Center in Ramallah.

(full article online)

UNRWA’s Message of Hate and Indoctrination
 
Already in 2014, Mahmoud Abbas instituted life imprisonment with forced labor for “the clandestine transfer, leasing or selling of lands to a hostile country or its citizens”(read: Jews). The previous penalty for the “clandestine transfer of land” had been temporary forced labor. At the time, the “… Supreme Fatwa Council… chaired by the Mufti of Jerusalem and Palestine, Sheikh Muhammad Hussein, designated anyone selling Palestinian real estate to the enemy a traitor to Allah and His Messenger, as well as to his religion and homeland, and [decreed that] he is to be shunned by all Muslims.”

Earlier this year, the mufti said, “The basis is that Palestine is kharaj (i.e., taxable land in Islam) and waqf (i.e., an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law) land, and it is forbidden by religious law to sell its lands and transfer them to the enemies’ ownership… The transfer of ownership of territory of Islam (dar Al-Islam) to enemies is invalid, and constitutes treason against Supreme Allah and his Prophet [Muhammad] … Anyone who sells his land to his enemies or receives compensation for it is sinning, because anyone that sells land to enemies is facilitating the removal of Muslims from their lands, and Blessed and Supreme Allah equates him to those who fight Muslims because of their religion… The selling of lands to enemies and negotiation [to sell] to them are heresy through actions, and considered loyalty to infidels who are fighting [Muslims]. This loyalty [to infidels] leads to banishment from the nation, and anyone who does this is considered as one who leaves Islam and a traitor against Allah, His honorable prophet, His religion, and His homeland… The Muslims must excommunicate him, and not do business with him, not marry him, not demonstrate friendliness to him, not participate in his funeral, not pray for him, and not bury him in Muslim cemeteries.”

The Arabs who tried to sell land to Jews in Hebron can look forward to life imprisonment and a subhuman existence as outcasts, “apostates” subjected to forced labor for engaging in something that most people would probably describe as “co-existence”.

However, unsurprisingly, Mahmoud Abbas and his PA, funded by the West to the tune of billions of dollars, are just not into “co-existence”. Just as they are not into “diversity”, “tolerance”, “inclusiveness” and “sharing the land”. They are, however, into discriminatory laws in the spirit of the old Nazis – and just like those old Nazis, they refuse to tolerate anyone who thinks differently.

(full article online)

The Flagrant Racism of the Palestinian Authority
 
The initial verse is interesting. It comes from the Quran, 47:7.

Here is the context of the Quranic statement:

1. Those who disbelieve and repel from the path of God—He nullifies their works.

2. While those who believe, and work righteousness, and believe in what was sent down to Muhammad—and it is the truth from their Lord—He remits their sins, and relieves their concerns.

3. That is because those who disbelieve follow falsehoods, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord. God thus cites for the people their examples.

4. When you encounter those who disbelieve, strike at their necks. Then, when you have routed them, bind them firmly. Then, either release them by grace, or by ransom, until war lays down its burdens. Had God willed, He could have defeated them Himself, but He thus tests some of you by means of others. As for those who are killed in the way of God, He will not let their deeds go to waste.

5. He will guide them, and will improve their state of mind.

6. And will admit them into Paradise, which He has identified for them.

7. O you who believe! If you support God, He will support you, and will strengthen your foothold.

8. But as for those who disbelieve, for them is perdition, and He will waste their deeds.

9. That is because they hated what God revealed, so He nullified their deeds.

10. Have they not journeyed through the earth and seen the consequences for those before them? God poured destruction upon them, and for the unbelievers is something comparable.

11. That is because God is the Master of those who believe, while the disbelievers have no master.

This message is anything but peaceful.

(full article online)

The Quranic verse that Mahmoud Abbas quoted to Palestinian youth ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
Senior Hamas member Hamad Houdri, who owns a money-changing business declared by Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman (YIsrael Beytenu) to be a terror organization, convinced Gaza businessmen to work with his business in exchange for financial benefits.

Thousands of textile products were scheduled to be sold to Gaza civilians and the profits handed over to Hamas, for use in terror activities in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. Some of the funds would have gone to pay Hamas terrorists' salaries, while others were intended for use in funding terror attacks and acquiring illegal weapons.

Thanks to operational and intelligence activities, Israeli security forces and Tax Authority officials succeeded in stopping and confiscating several of the containers.

(Full article online)

Textile merchants helped aid Hamas terror
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top