Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 55,837
- 56,067
- Thread starter
- #41
Well, we have to communicate to understand, but there are many who won't be any part of creating answers.That may actually be true, now that wingers have the floor.I've never claimed to be a centrist, and I've gone so far as to include that point in the second line of my sig.So being a centrist, what is your definition of moderation?
What would you like to see happen?
Moderation seems to be a good idea in most parts of life, yet not in politics any more. It's the ability for a person to accurately understand and appreciate other points of view and the willingness of that person to collaborate with others to find and create common ground for long-term solutions. Wingers can only create short-term solutions because they only include strategies from their end of the spectrum, and the pendulum keeps swinging.
What I would very much like to see is wingers on both ends of the spectrum culturally marginalized so that those who have the willingness and capacity for collaboration and innovation can get on with the task of improving my country.
.
But in the midst of extremism, moderation seems the most extremist of all.
.
The Swamp has groupies on both sides of the isle that think that the solution to all their problem's is to get their "R" or "D" in the Oval office.
Why even talk to such people?
.
Most voters are plum stupid. This is from either not caring or not being intellectually able to follow what is happening. Either way, this is one of the flaws of democracy.
Democracy in ancient Greece worked somewhat because men debated and studied the issues of the day while their slaves took care of them. In fact, there were far more slaves than voters. You might even say that their democracy worked through slavery.
But today, we give the slaves the ability to vote as such organizations as academia and the media influence people on how to vote.
In fact, most did not support the American Revolution back in the day. It was conducted by a minority who were informed.
So how can the Article V movement work? Simple, most people have been conditioned by Progressive to look to a king of some kind, such as a President, for all their answers. In fact, I bet most don't even know who their local representative is. This is why most only show up during Presidential elections and only vote for the President whil often leaving the rest of the ballot blank.
All we need to do is motivate a minority of voters to target their state representatives to vote for the Article V movement. Over 10 states already have.