Who is the real founder of ISIS???

[Faun]

is the exit hole,

LMFAO!!!

The desperation of Treason Supporters here is laughable, because the Pentagon, of the whole 911 fraud, is the MOST OBVIOUS = a well documented proof below

I just showed you an aerial view of that hole, showing it was exit hole in the C-ring, and you still deny it??

 

[LaDexter]

Indeed I do.

You are an obsessed Zionist who will lie until Hell freezes.

Your pals did this, and you don't want a patriotic American auditing your 2001 tax returns....

 

[Faun]

Indeed I do.

You are an obsessed Zionist who will lie until Hell freezes.

Your pals did this, and you don't want a patriotic American auditing your 2001 tax returns....

You can cream all you want over that idiocy -- you still can't tell the difference between the entrance hole on the outside of the E-rings from the exit hole, three rings into the Pentagon.

 

[LaDexter]

Then post the "entrance hole" for us....

 

[Faun]

Then post the "entrance hole" for us....

 

[LaDexter]

So, if the plane made that "hole" as you put it coming in at about 400 mph with the nose about 8 feet off the ground, what made the "exit hole?"

And why isn't there any debris?

Do you really think a 757 would just smash through the steel reinforced concrete barrier walls of the Pentagon?

 

[Faun]

Then post the "entrance hole" for us....

I can only hope you're lucid enough to comprehend the implications of the photo below in stark contrast to your lunatic claims that 12 foot hole was the entrance hole...

.... you'll note, your 12 foot hole in the wall on the right.....

That wall is of the C-ring. The wall on the left is from the B-ring.

Now check out the chart below to see how fucking deranged you are to claim that 12 foot hole was the entrance hole, which would have required whatever it was that was flown into the Pentagon, to swoop down into the middle of it to fly into the C-ring.

If you have any semblance of sanity remaining, this post should be mind-blowing to you.

... if not, you're too far gone into the abyss.

 

[Faun]

So, if the plane made that "hole" as you put it coming in at about 400 mph with the nose about 8 feet off the ground, what made the "exit hole?"

And why isn't there any debris?

Do you really think a 757 would just smash through the steel reinforced concrete barrier walls of the Pentagon?

The debris made that 12 foot exit hole in the C-ring, ya dumbfucking raving lunatic.

And WTF are you talking about, "why isn't there any debris?"

 

[LaDexter]

The debris made that 12 foot exit hole

Debris made this???

LOL!!!





That's quite a bit of force on one round piece of debris....

LOL!!

Anyone who looks at this, did whatever make this hole enter, or exit???

What speed would be required to push an object through steel reinforced concrete to leave a hole like that?

A: the speed of a CRUISE MISSILE

 

[LaDexter]

As for the CHOSEN Pholoshopping of plane debris, sorry, don't buy it - nope...


And where is the plane??? It would be more believable if the plane had crashed from above going straight down, as opposed to the cruise missile is really a plane "flight path..."

 

[Faun]

As for the CHOSEN Pholoshopping of plane debris, sorry, don't buy it - nope...


And where is the plane??? It would be more believable if the plane had crashed from above going straight down, as opposed to the cruise missile is really a plane "flight path..."

Who cares what you buy? Have you already forgotten you've been exposed as a brain-dead imbecile truther who thought a Cruise missile flew into the exit hole in the C-ring in the middle of the Pentagon??

You've well established you're completely incapable if rendering any lucid judgements over the attack.

As far as your Cruise missile idiocy.... a Cruise missile is incapable of knocking down 2 rows of lampposts and creating the damage caused to the [actual] entrance hole on the outside of the E-ring.

... Rendering you batshit insane for claiming a Cruise missile is what was flown into the Pentagon.

 

[Faun]

The debris made that 12 foot exit hole

Debris made this???

LOL!!!





That's quite a bit of force on one round piece of debris....

LOL!!

Anyone who looks at this, did whatever make this hole enter, or exit???

What speed would be required to push an object through steel reinforced concrete to leave a hole like that?

A: the speed of a CRUISE MISSILE

Moron..... Cruise missiles blow up upon inpact. Unlike a 757 which has many parts, continue blasting through 6 exterior walls.

 

[jillian]

This guy, our worst ever enemy, who has both parties bought and paid for...

only in anti-Semite fantasyland

 

[jillian]

So, if the plane made that "hole" as you put it coming in at about 400 mph with the nose about 8 feet off the ground, what made the "exit hole?"

And why isn't there any debris?

Do you really think a 757 would just smash through the steel reinforced concrete barrier walls of the Pentagon?

omg! an anti-Semite AND a troofer....

gotta love the level of stupid

 

[LaDexter]

Have you already forgotten you've been exposed as a brain-dead imbecile truther who thought a Cruise missile flew into the exit hole in the C-ring in the middle of the Pentagon??

LMFAO!!!

We can agree to disagree on that. That is the ENTRY HOLE of the CRUISE MISSILE, and you and the rest of the Zionists trying to lie about that are as laughable as the Global Warming crew...

a Cruise missile is incapable of knocking down 2 rows of lampposts

One of the amazing things about those lampposts is that several have no dents or marks at all - they were SUCKED out of the ground by the air wake of an object travelling very very fast...


Your side wants us to believe that a kid who was quoted saying "I don't need to learn how to take off or land, I just need to learn to steer" flew this 757 better than Capt Sully could have, taking out lampposts without cartwheeling, scraping his engines on/in the ground, and keeping the thing totally straight and on target.

You Zionist Traitors need the name calling BS, because all you've ever had is BS...

 

[LaDexter]

omg! an anti-Semite AND a troofer....

gotta love the level of stupid

Sorry...

I forgot the card tossing too...

 

[Faun]

Have you already forgotten you've been exposed as a brain-dead imbecile truther who thought a Cruise missile flew into the exit hole in the C-ring in the middle of the Pentagon??

LMFAO!!!

We can agree to disagree on that. That is the ENTRY HOLE of the CRUISE MISSILE, and you and the rest of the Zionists trying to lie about that are as laughable as the Global Warming crew...

a Cruise missile is incapable of knocking down 2 rows of lampposts

One of the amazing things about those lampposts is that several have no dents or marks at all - they were SUCKED out of the ground by the air wake of an object travelling very very fast...


Your side wants us to believe that a kid who was quoted saying "I don't need to learn how to take off or land, I just need to learn to steer" flew this 757 better than Capt Sully could have, taking out lampposts without cartwheeling, scraping his engines on/in the ground, and keeping the thing totally straight and on target.

You Zionist Traitors need the name calling BS, because all you've ever had is BS...

No, we cannot agree to disagree on that. There is no way in hell a Cruise missile can swoop down in between rings B and C to fly horizontally into that hole.

It's well beyond the capabilities for a Cruise missile to maneuver in such a jagged fashion in such a small space.

That you maintain this idiocy does nothing other than to expose not only how insane you are -- but also how committed you are to your delusions.

Try for once to face reality....

You thought that 12 foot round hole was on the outside of the Pentagon's E-ring. You thought that since that hole was small and circular, it appears to be what one would expect the damage could look like with a Cruise missile penetrating it....

But that's the exit hole in the C-ring, not the entrance hole in the E-ring.

Your entire truther world has just been flipped upside-down and you're resisting the reality such a life-changing experience can offer with every fiber of your brain-dead existence.

 

[LaDexter]

Your explanation is absolutely laughable. Desperate, hysterical and laughable, but given what your rabbi asks you to defend, well, it was never going to be any different....

How we KNOW an airliner did NOT hit the Pentagon

The hole created in the outer ring of the Pentagon by the supposed impact was less than 20 feet in diameter and was just a few feet above ground level. The upper floors, which should have been hit by the tail section of the plane remained intact. Most windows were not even broken, although the upper floors did collapse about 20 minutes after the crash.

The inside hole: notice no damage to floor?

There was no damage to either side of the less-than-20-foot hole where the fuselage would have hit although there was an uninterrupted opening about 50 feet across at ground level, which is more like 80 when you include partially intact columns. Either way, this is not wide enough to accommodate a plane with a nearly 125-foot wingspan (As Massimo Mazzucco points out inSeptember 11: The New Pearl Harbor, the plane is supposed to have hit at a roughly 42-degree angle, which would have extended the width of the contact between the plane and the wall from 124 feet to 160 feet). There was no damage to the grass, which should have been gouged by the engines dragging on the ground.

All of this is physically impossible, plain and simple. The wings of a 757 can’t hit a concrete building at more than 500 mph without leaving a mark. And they certainly won’t be vaporized by exploding jet fuel.

 

[Faun]

Your explanation is absolutely laughable. Desperate, hysterical and laughable, but given what your rabbi asks you to defend, well, it was never going to be any different....

How we KNOW an airliner did NOT hit the Pentagon

The hole created in the outer ring of the Pentagon by the supposed impact was less than 20 feet in diameter and was just a few feet above ground level. The upper floors, which should have been hit by the tail section of the plane remained intact. Most windows were not even broken, although the upper floors did collapse about 20 minutes after the crash.

The inside hole: notice no damage to floor?

There was no damage to either side of the less-than-20-foot hole where the fuselage would have hit although there was an uninterrupted opening about 50 feet across at ground level, which is more like 80 when you include partially intact columns. Either way, this is not wide enough to accommodate a plane with a nearly 125-foot wingspan (As Massimo Mazzucco points out inSeptember 11: The New Pearl Harbor, the plane is supposed to have hit at a roughly 42-degree angle, which would have extended the width of the contact between the plane and the wall from 124 feet to 160 feet). There was no damage to the grass, which should have been gouged by the engines dragging on the ground.

All of this is physically impossible, plain and simple. The wings of a 757 can’t hit a concrete building at more than 500 mph without leaving a mark. And they certainly won’t be vaporized by exploding jet fuel.

No matter how many times you make this ridiculous claim, it's not true. It will never be true.

That's not the hole the plane flew through. This is...

You'll notice the portion of the hole that's visible is more than big enough to fit the fuselage of a 757, which is only about 12 to 13 feet wide.

It cracks me up that you idiotically think you've figured out that 9.11 was faked -- but you can't tell the entrance hole in the E-ring from the exit hole in the C-ring.