Who started WW II.

What a load of horse shit. After it had been proven that just one plane could sink a battleship, carries became the most important warships. Also, look at the attack on Pearl Harbor. It wasn't battleships that caused the destruction. It was aircraft from aircraft carriers.
It was never proven that one plane could sink a battleship you ignorant fucktard
 
He was jewish you idiot

Yes German jews were killed along with all the other jews.

The rest of your claim is shit you pulled from your ass

Who was jewish. Not Hitler. Next, some Germans and jewish Germans probably were executed. For treason. Next, look up The Haavara Agreement for yourself. Whether or not what you will find about it being true is a different matter. But there was such a thing.
 
Liar you brought it up in your first post therrefore you answer for it

The link you xite is FICTIONJ

Liar. In the thread I first posted, I didn't mention the holocaust. Why would I. This thread is about who started WW II. And what makes you think the link I gave was fiction. It went into quite a bit of detail.
 
Je
Who was jewish. Not Hitler. Next, some Germans and jewish Germans probably were executed. For treason. Next, look up The Haavara Agreement for yourself. Whether or not what you will find about it being true is a different matter. But there was such a thing.
Yes Hitler was

Jewish Germans were massacred along with all other other jews just for being jewish

The Haavara agreement does not contradict the fact that you are wrong
 
Hey you stupid shit for braisn I am in your face FOREVER correcting your lies

Now before telling others to read something YOU FUCKING READ IT

Clearly you missed the part where it took Mitchell MULTIPLE aircraft to sink the Ostfriesland

Not ONE aircraft as you claimed you retarded sack of shit
 
Liar. In the thread I first posted, I didn't mention the holocaust. Why would I. This thread is about who started WW II. And what makes you think the link I gave was fiction. It went into quite a bit of detail.
I admit I stand corrected

You broguth it up first in post # 82 not post number 1 but you still opned it up bvy posting a bald faced proven lie.

No thread of yours posted any evidence whatsoever that it never happened
 
Bullshit. We didn't need any warships from England. Maybe this will interest you.
Destroyers-for-bases deal - Wikipedia
That was before we entered the war. Once we did, the US had a severe shortage of anti-submarine escorts. The navy was using seized civilian yachts with a couple of machine guns as coastal convoy escorts for god’s sake. You need to read a little history.
 
What a load of horse shit. After it had been proven that just one plane could sink a battleship, carries became the most important warships. Also, look at the attack on Pearl Harbor. It wasn't battleships that caused the destruction. It was aircraft from aircraft carriers.
You can’t even read. And, no a single aircraft can’t sink a battleship except with a golden bb like the one that killed Arizona, and even that wouldn’t have happened if she hadn’t had the propellant charges for her 14” guns outside the magazines because they were being swapped out for fresh charges. You might notice that none of the other battleships exploded despite being hit with multiple sixteen hundred pound bombs each. Even at Pearl, sitting with their watertight doors latched open, it took multiple torpedo hits to sink the battleships. Bismarck took at least two torpedo hits and could still make over twenty five knots, unfortunately since one of the torpedoes jammed her rudder it was in a circle. South Dakota took a bomb hit on her B turret without any damage worse than scratched paint. It took over twenty torpedo hits apiece to sink Yamato and Mushashi. Prince of Wales took four torpedo hits and was still afloat until one of her engineering officers started up a bent prop shaft and tore her stern apart. HMS Repulse took hits from at least four torpedoes and a bomb before sinking. Shall I go on?
 
It would seem that you need a history lesson. But though I've tried, you seem immune to learning anything other than the propaganda of the victorious allies. Be that as it may, I'll try again. Read this.

codoh.com › document › why-germany-invaded-polandWhy Germany Invaded Poland | CODOH
A conspiracy website ran by anti-Semitics, gee, they favor Hitler, who would have thought. He hated Jews, blacks, homosexuals, Slavics, Gypsies, Polish, Russians he believed he was part of the superior white race.
 
Gee who woulda thought that the Far Left & Left would chase Pro Israel Practicing Jewish speakers off campus at UC Irvine & CAL and other schools across the country (William & Mary ) ( Syracuse ) ( Brown) ...
 
Hey you stupid shit for braisn I am in your face FOREVER correcting your lies

Now before telling others to read something YOU FUCKING READ IT

Clearly you missed the part where it took Mitchell MULTIPLE aircraft to sink the Ostfriesland

Not ONE aircraft as you claimed you retarded sack of shit

It did take multiple tries. But in the end it was one plane that dropped one bomb on target that was the fatal blow. So could planes sink a battleship? Yes. What more needs to be said. And planes did a hell of a lot of damage at Pearl Harbor. So apparently, you are the retarded piece of shit.
 
I admit I stand corrected

You broguth it up first in post # 82 not post number 1 but you still opned it up bvy posting a bald faced proven lie.

No thread of yours posted any evidence whatsoever that it never happened

You wsant evidence that the holocaust never happened? Go to my thread "The holocaust. The reality." It starts off with all the evidence any sane person would need.
 
If Imperial Japan was invading 2 Countries and harassing 4 others by 1935 it would seem they kicked off WW2

Wars are going on all the time. They're happening right now. But that doesn't make it a world war.
 
That was before we entered the war. Once we did, the US had a severe shortage of anti-submarine escorts. The navy was using seized civilian yachts with a couple of machine guns as coastal convoy escorts for god’s sake. You need to read a little history.

What kind of idiot would send a yacht into war.
 
You can’t even read. And, no a single aircraft can’t sink a battleship except with a golden bb like the one that killed Arizona, and even that wouldn’t have happened if she hadn’t had the propellant charges for her 14” guns outside the magazines because they were being swapped out for fresh charges. You might notice that none of the other battleships exploded despite being hit with multiple sixteen hundred pound bombs each. Even at Pearl, sitting with their watertight doors latched open, it took multiple torpedo hits to sink the battleships. Bismarck took at least two torpedo hits and could still make over twenty five knots, unfortunately since one of the torpedoes jammed her rudder it was in a circle. South Dakota took a bomb hit on her B turret without any damage worse than scratched paint. It took over twenty torpedo hits apiece to sink Yamato and Mushashi. Prince of Wales took four torpedo hits and was still afloat until one of her engineering officers started up a bent prop shaft and tore her stern apart. HMS Repulse took hits from at least four torpedoes and a bomb before sinking. Shall I go on?

I don't know exactly what various weapons Japanese used to sink what. The point is one airplane could sink a battleship. And when the Japanese started using planes piloted by kamikazes, that scared the shit out of the sailors.
 
A conspiracy website ran by anti-Semitics, gee, they favor Hitler, who would have thought. He hated Jews, blacks, homosexuals, Slavics, Gypsies, Polish, Russians he believed he was part of the superior white race.

To you, any website that doesn't support the victors view of history is probably an anti-semetic website. Either what they had to say was true or it wasn't. Also, before it was closed down to debate, I did a thread called "How racist were the Nazis." Read it. You might learn something. As for Gypsies, they are still widely disliked by Europeans. (And for good reason) Are you going to blame the Nazis for that? When they were defeated decades ago?
 
To you, any website that doesn't support the victors view of history is probably an anti-semetic website. Either what they had to say was true or it wasn't. Also, before it was closed down to debate, I did a thread called "How racist were the Nazis." Read it. You might learn something. As for Gypsies, they are still widely disliked by Europeans. (And for good reason) Are you going to blame the Nazis for that? When they were defeated decades ago?
The sources from the website prove nothing it is all supposition based on what ifs, it also goes against Hitler’s own manifesto, did he lie?
 

Forum List

Back
Top