If that is what they want. They are ethnic Russians so they would probably prefer it.By being “free” of Kiev, you mean being conquered by Russia and turned into satellite clients dependent on Russia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that is what they want. They are ethnic Russians so they would probably prefer it.By being “free” of Kiev, you mean being conquered by Russia and turned into satellite clients dependent on Russia.
Originally posted by AZrailwhale
Soviet and Russian corruption made cooperation impossible with the USA despite the American government actively encouraging companies to invest in Russia.
but by the 1991 Rome summit in November, members agreed to a series of goals that could lead to accession
Enlargement of NATO - Wikipedia
It’s been proven. The ex-GRU officer in charge admitted it.Doubt that.
There are no former GRU officers. Only traitors held by the balls by the enemy.It’s been proven. The ex-GRU officer in charge admitted it.
Yeah, clearly. Russia is almost like Germany in 1945. They're planning to use the Putlerjungend to defend Russia, which may well happen in the case of a civil war.Ukraine reminds me of Poland in 1939: An newly independent country which separated a great power from its vital territories. Egged on by the far-removed British, Poland pugnaciously refused any land access between Germany and East Prussia. Germany finally took this matter into its own hands and the British foolishly started another world war.
Does anyone see the parallels between this catastrophe and the Russian invasion of Ukraine? Like the dissolution of Germany after WW1, the breakup of the Soviet Union resulted in the newly independent country of Ukraine, which deprived Russia of its vital naval base in Crimea. As the U.S. started meddling in Ukrainian politics, Ukraine became more and more belligerent towards Russian access to its naval base. When Russia finally retook Crimea, the U.S. response was so weak that Russia decided to retake all of the connecting provinces in East Ukraine.
Just like Britain in 1939, the U.S. had foolishly guaranteed Ukrainian territory and now felt it had to engage in hostile military action in order to save face and economically harm its Russian rival. Is the risk of a nuclear conflagration really worth this proxy war?