Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why did George Bush drive up the black unemployment rate the year before he left office? lol

are you fricken blind? obozo took office in jan 09. the UE rate went up under his failed administration and never got back down to 08 rates. That is on Obama.

the rich got their bailout.

wrong, the UAW got its bailout. Obama saved the union bosses and kept the union money flowing to the DNC. There was no "rich bailout". Where do you get this shit?

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, it doesn't; that only happens when engage our Commerce Clause, not our defense clause. All lowering taxes does is increase our debt.

Then how do revenues increase when taxes are cut?

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

 

[Aries]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

 

[danielpalos]

Why did George Bush drive up the black unemployment rate the year before he left office? lol

are you fricken blind? obozo took office in jan 09. the UE rate went up under his failed administration and never got back down to 08 rates. That is on Obama.

the rich got their bailout.

wrong, the UAW got its bailout. Obama saved the union bosses and kept the union money flowing to the DNC. There was no "rich bailout". Where do you get this shit?

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it doesn't; that only happens when engage our Commerce Clause, not our defense clause. All lowering taxes does is increase our debt.

Then how do revenues increase when taxes are cut?

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

for a limited base; why does our debt keep growing, if we can, simply end our corporate taxes to grow our way out it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

after the dark days of bush Obama......

That's awesome! But how'd they do under Obama compared to under Reagan?
Unless you can't prove your claim?

 

[Aries]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

after the dark days of bush Obama......

That's awesome! But how'd they do under Obama compared to under Reagan?
Unless you can't prove your claim?

You want to compare economies with decades of difference in between? Take a lap.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

are you fricken blind? obozo took office in jan 09. the UE rate went up under his failed administration and never got back down to 08 rates. That is on Obama.

the rich got their bailout.

wrong, the UAW got its bailout. Obama saved the union bosses and kept the union money flowing to the DNC. There was no "rich bailout". Where do you get this shit?

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

They were still spending money and creating demand

So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, it doesn't; that only happens when engage our Commerce Clause, not our defense clause. All lowering taxes does is increase our debt.

Then how do revenues increase when taxes are cut?

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

for a limited base; why does our debt keep growing, if we can, simply end our corporate taxes to grow our way out it?

for a limited base;

The base of all capital holdings.

why does our debt keep growing,

Politicians spend way too much.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

after the dark days of bush Obama......

That's awesome! But how'd they do under Obama compared to under Reagan?
Unless you can't prove your claim?

You want to compare economies with decades of difference in between? Take a lap.

I want you to provide back up for your claim.
How'd the poor and middle class do better under Jimmy Carter compared to under Reagan?

 

[danielpalos]

the rich got their bailout.

wrong, the UAW got its bailout. Obama saved the union bosses and kept the union money flowing to the DNC. There was no "rich bailout". Where do you get this shit?

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

They were still spending money and creating demand

So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.

so what; so was labor, positively engendering a positive multiplier effect.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it doesn't; that only happens when engage our Commerce Clause, not our defense clause. All lowering taxes does is increase our debt.

Then how do revenues increase when taxes are cut?

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

for a limited base; why does our debt keep growing, if we can, simply end our corporate taxes to grow our way out it?

for a limited base;

The base of all capital holdings.

why does our debt keep growing,

Politicians spend way too much.

nothing but diversion? simply cut taxes and spend more--it is the Republican way.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

wrong, the UAW got its bailout. Obama saved the union bosses and kept the union money flowing to the DNC. There was no "rich bailout". Where do you get this shit?

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

They were still spending money and creating demand

So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.

so what; so was labor, positively engendering a positive multiplier effect.

Labor got a TARP loan? Tell me more!

 

[Aries]

It is the GOP that hates the poor, that much is clear. Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish. When there is a republican president, the poor and middle class alone face the full brunt of their regressive and damaging policies. Democrats are overall better for the economy. Under our leadership unemployment shrinks and our market expands. Low unemployment rates and a healthy market are extremely important when looking at the living standard of our poor. Time and time again, republicans have instituted legislation that is directly damaging to the development and uplifting process of our nation's poor. Things like corporate welfare, low minimum wage, war on drugs, stop and frisk, even trumps elimination of EPA regulations- disproportionately hurt low income Americans. It is republican policies, systemic oppression, and the extreme wealth inequity in our country that keeps poor families in the cycle of generational poverty.
Want to break generational poverty?
Want to create an economy where we can all be successful? Stop voting in Republican critters would be a good start!

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

after the dark days of bush Obama......

That's awesome! But how'd they do under Obama compared to under Reagan?
Unless you can't prove your claim?

You want to compare economies with decades of difference in between? Take a lap.

I want you to provide back up for your claim.
How'd the poor and middle class do better under Jimmy Carter compared to under Reagan?

The Economy Under Democratic vs. Republican Presidents - Reports by Publication Date - United States Joint Economic Committee

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then how do revenues increase when taxes are cut?

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

for a limited base; why does our debt keep growing, if we can, simply end our corporate taxes to grow our way out it?

for a limited base;

The base of all capital holdings.

why does our debt keep growing,

Politicians spend way too much.

nothing but diversion? simply cut taxes and spend more--it is the Republican way.

I'm sorry that I disproved your claim by pointing out the increased revenues collected by government every time the cap gains tax rate is cut.

 

[danielpalos]

Unlike the right wing, I try to stay informed about the topics I argue.

In 2008–09 the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve System bailed out numerous very large banks and insurance companies, as well as General Motors and Chrysler.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailout#U.S._savings_and_loan_crisis

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

They were still spending money and creating demand

So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.

so what; so was labor, positively engendering a positive multiplier effect.

Labor got a TARP loan? Tell me more!

labor was still getting paid and spending money, and not while on unemployment, as would have happened, with laissez-fair capitalism for the rich.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Every time there is a democratic president, the poor and middle class flourish.

Cool story! How'd the poor and middle class do under Obama compared to under Reagan?

after the dark days of bush Obama put people back to work, lowered their taxes, and expanded assistance....So, better. They did better.

after the dark days of bush Obama......

That's awesome! But how'd they do under Obama compared to under Reagan?
Unless you can't prove your claim?

You want to compare economies with decades of difference in between? Take a lap.

I want you to provide back up for your claim.
How'd the poor and middle class do better under Jimmy Carter compared to under Reagan?

The Economy Under Democratic vs. Republican Presidents - Reports by Publication Date - United States Joint Economic Committee

Thanks for the link!
Do you have one that shows the poor and middle class did better under Jimmy Carter compared to under Reagan?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The bank bailout was repaid at a huge profit to the US Treasury.
The UAW bailout cost big money, $12.6 billion in losses.

They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.

They were still spending money and creating demand

So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.

so what; so was labor, positively engendering a positive multiplier effect.

Labor got a TARP loan? Tell me more!

labor was still getting paid and spending money, and not while on unemployment, as would have happened, with laissez-fair capitalism for the rich.

Yes, but enough about the profitable bank bailout.
Let's talk about the HUGE losses for the UAW bailout.

 

[danielpalos]

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt. Only the right wing, never gets it.

They don't; it is why we have increasing debt.

Capital gains tax receipts increase every time the rate is cut.

for a limited base; why does our debt keep growing, if we can, simply end our corporate taxes to grow our way out it?

for a limited base;

The base of all capital holdings.

why does our debt keep growing,

Politicians spend way too much.

nothing but diversion? simply cut taxes and spend more--it is the Republican way.

I'm sorry that I disproved your claim by pointing out the increased revenues collected by government every time the cap gains tax rate is cut.

a limited base; our debt is still growing.

a wartime economy requires wartime tax rates; thus, we need to raise taxes not lower taxes.