danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
Where did they account for the positive multiplier effect, like they did for banks?labor was still getting paid and spending money, and not while on unemployment, as would have happened, with laissez-fair capitalism for the rich.so what; so was labor, positively engendering a positive multiplier effect.They were still spending money and creating demand, and that form of positive multiplier effect.
They were still spending money and creating demand
So were the banks...after profitably repaying the bank bailout.
Labor got a TARP loan? Tell me more!
Yes, but enough about the profitable bank bailout.
Let's talk about the HUGE losses for the UAW bailout.