Why do poor communities exist in America?

[Soupnazi630]

You don't understand the concept or are simply manufacturing your conclusion regardless of Any logic and Any reason.

I understand it perfectly and your claim is an outright lie

 

[danielpalos]

I understand it perfectly and your claim is an outright lie

You assume your conclusions instead of providing any valid line of reasoning for your point of view.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You assume your conclusions instead of providing any valid line of reasoning for your point of view.

I state facts which you avoid. You state fallacies with no accuracy of any sort to support them.

 

[danielpalos]

This is the public domain. Anyone can read it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Always has been

This is the public domain. Anyone can read it.

The world reads it and knows you are a liar

 

[danielpalos]

Always has been

The world reads it and knows you are a liar

You assume your own conclusion.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You assume your own conclusion.

I state facts and assume nothing. You state fallacies and bear false witness

 

[danielpalos]

Right wingers are willing to prove their lack of morals or ethics. Why should anyone trust them in any threads requiring ethics or morals?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Right wingers are willing to prove their lack of morals or ethics. Why should anyone trust them in any threads requiring ethics or morals?

There are no such threads. You are exactlyu that sort of right winger.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, they have. If you haven't created a for-cause employment relationship, at-will employment Laws apply for any fantasy enacted by the legislature.

No, at-will employment laws apply to at-will employment to define the at-will relationships.

 

[WinterBorn]

All you need is a valid argument to prove it.

We have shown valid arguments. You never even slowed down in your quest for a free ride.

 

[danielpalos]

No, at-will employment laws apply to at-will employment to define the at-will relationships.

Thus, no other public policy can abridge the legal privileges and immunities afforded by the concept of employment at-will.

 

[danielpalos]

We have shown valid arguments. You never even slowed down in your quest for a free ride.

What valid arguments? All y'all do is appeal to ignorance and assume your own conclusions.

 

[WinterBorn]

Thus, no other public policy can abridge the legal privileges and immunities afforded by the concept of employment at-will.

And no other law or public policy abridges the rights and privileges afforded by the at-will employment laws, which only describe the at-will employment relationships.

 

[WinterBorn]

What valid arguments? All y'all do is appeal to ignorance and assume your own conclusions.

No. You have been shown that, not only does the current UC law not abridge any rights or privileges afforded by the at-will employment laws, but that there are plenty of situations in which the at-will employment laws are, in fact, abridged. And legally. The best example is the whistleblower protection laws.

 

[danielpalos]

And no other law or public policy abridges the rights and privileges afforded by the at-will employment laws, which only describe the at-will employment relationships.

The description is a definition. Legislators are not authorized to abridge the privileges and immunities established by at-will employment law.

 

[danielpalos]

No. You have been shown that, not only does the current UC law not abridge any rights or privileges afforded by the at-will employment laws, but that there are plenty of situations in which the at-will employment laws are, in fact, abridged. And legally. The best example is the whistleblower protection laws.

Only because you forget the concepts and appeal to ignorance. For-cause criteria are banned by our State and federal Constitutions as an abridgment of at-will employment law.

 

[WinterBorn]

The description is a definition. Legislators are not authorized to abridge the privileges and immunities established by at-will employment law.

The at-will employment states that an employee is free to quit, strike, of cease working for any reason. The employer is free to terminate any employee for any reason or no reason. There are exceptions to both, but that is the law.

Nothing in the UC abridges ANY of that.

 

[WinterBorn]

Only because you forget the concepts and appeal to ignorance. For-cause criteria are banned by our State and federal Constitutions as an abridgment of at-will employment law.

For cause criteria are not banned. They are not needed. But they are not banned.

 

[danielpalos]

The at-will employment states that an employee is free to quit, strike, of cease working for any reason. The employer is free to terminate any employee for any reason or no reason. There are exceptions to both, but that is the law.

Nothing in the UC abridges ANY of that.

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridges that. It really is that simple and that rational.