Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At-will makes all the economic difference in the world. Why be so "Communist" by demanding a work ethic when our economy can handle natural unemployment via public policy for automatic stabilization?
No one is making you work for low pay in any at-will employment State, except the right-wing with their preference for Communistic, Big Government, State control over Individuals.Why? Because why should I work hard to support myself AND those who choose to be unemployed? The audacity it takes to refuse to work, and then expect others to support you when you won't lift a finger to support yourself. And refuse to show that you NEED the support to live.
No one is making you work for low pay in any at-will employment State, except the right-wing with their preference for Communistic, Big Government, State control over Individuals.
Only false Capitalists could even conceive of that. There is no unemployment under Capitalism only underpayment.Right, so I should just quit and live off someone else's labor? And what percentage of the population can do that before the money runs out?
Only false Capitalists could even conceive of that. There is no unemployment under Capitalism only underpayment.
Proof, you don't care about Capitalism only your socialism on a national basis.Only an idiot could not conceive of that.
But since you have researched everything and have all the answers, what percentage of the population could just quit work and draw your New & Improved unemployment before the tax well ran dry?
Proof, you don't care about Capitalism only your socialism on a national basis.
You are still assuming your conclusion without showing any reasoning as you how you arrived at it.
Since less labor will be participating in that market, capitalists will merely need to raise wages until more people want to work to earn more money. Simple market arbitrage under Capitalism.
Only false Christians and less ethical (right-wingers) have a problem with it. Don't understand what Equal protection of the laws mean?Less labor participating, but they still get paid a living wage.
Only false Christians and less ethical (right-wingers) have a problem with it. Don't understand what Equal protection of the laws mean?
There is no problem with equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation. You have provided nothing that supports your right-wing fantasy.Yes, I do. And the UC laws do not violate that. Everyone has the same rights under the at-will employment laws.
There is no problem with equal protection of at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation. You have provided nothing that supports your right-wing fantasy.
The legislature has no authority to deny or disparage at-will employment, contractual obligations in policies public.Yes, there is a problem. It changes the mission of the entire program. Plus it requires major changes to the program to create one that is a duplication of what we currently have in welfare.
The legislature has no authority to deny or disparage at-will employment, contractual obligations in policies public.
Yes, they have. If you haven't created a for-cause employment relationship, at-will employment Laws apply for any fantasy enacted by the legislature.The legislature has not denied or disparaged at-will employment.
We have equal protectionWe were discussing how the law would work with equal protection not how it does work currently. That is why I can't take you seriously in our arguments; you simply make stuff up and insist you have the "gospel Truth". Only hypocrites do that.
All you need is a valid argument to prove it.We have equal protection
All you need is a valid argument to prove it.
It is a valid factual argument in and of itself which you can only bear false witness againstAll you need is a valid argument to prove it.
You don't understand the concept or are simply manufacturing your conclusion regardless of Any logic and Any reason.It is a valid factual argument in and of itself which you can only bear false witness against
