PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #221
That is incorrect. Read their ruling. And yes, never, ever speak with the police, lawyer or not. Say nothing since nothing you say can help you and anything you say can hurt you.No, you must declare that you wish to remain silent.Just remember you have to say you want to remain silent, per the Supreme Court. Ironic eh?One would think that this is logical, wouldn't one?There's no evidence in support of any of this.
There is no evidence citizens carrying concealed weapons results in a rise or decline of violent crime.
Moreover, it's legally and Constitutionally irrelevant – citizens have the right to carry firearms pursuant to the right to lawful self-defense; citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right as a 'prerequisite' to indeed do so.
Hey, I don't really envision a scenario where I personally will ever need to use my right to remain silent either, doesn't mean it should be taken away.
You certainly do not have to say you want to remain silent.
SCOTUS has ruled that you MUST ask for an attorney, otherwise anything you say without an attorney present is admissible in court.
Police can't force you not to be silent,
God damned fools don't even understand the law LOL
Supreme Court Suspects must assert Miranda right to remain silent - CSMonitor.com
Now you know, asshole.
If you remain silent, there is no need for a declaration. The ruling was about being silent and then making statements later. If you remain silent, there is nothing to be held against you.
But anyone who talks to the police without a lawyer is a fool.