Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[JustAGuy1]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Sorry son, why didn't the House call them? Schiff (within the rules btw) got to set the rules for the House and McConnell (within the rule btw) gets to do the same in the Senate. Grow up.

Stop lying, they did call them.

You are a lying sack of silly excrement kid. But hey show us where they called them.

 

[Polishprince]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Sorry son, why didn't the House call them? Schiff (within the rules btw) got to set the rules for the House and McConnell (within the rule btw) gets to do the same in the Senate. Grow up.

Stop lying, they did call them.

Yes, Schiff did call these "witnesses", although it is unclear what, if anything, these men witnessed.

But what is clear is that they claimed Executive Privilege, and would certainly do so if they were called by the Senate in a trial.

The matter is being fought through the courts, and probably won't be resolved until 2022 or so.

So its rather a moot point. Either the libs have the dirt and can prove their charges against the President, or they can't, based upon the evidence they already have.

 

[Polishprince]

Laughed at and discarded? That's pretty much what any fair minded person does with polls from Politico, Faun! When you're using THEM...it's a sign of desperation!

Hisses a lying con tool.

Meanwhile, Impeached Trump remains impeached.

Evidently not. Impeachment is conditional until the articles are presented to the senate. McConnell has set Jan 6 as the day he will deal with impeachment. Likely if he has not been presented with the articles by then, he will ask Chief Justice Roberts to dismiss the impeachment for lack of prosecution.

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

 

[Faun]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Sorry son, why didn't the House call them? Schiff (within the rules btw) got to set the rules for the House and McConnell (within the rule btw) gets to do the same in the Senate. Grow up.

Stop lying, they did call them.

You are a lying sack of silly excrement kid. But hey show us where they called them.

Oh look, yet another ^^^ dumbfuck ^^^ who doesn't know anything.

Trump impeachment inquiry: Who has been subpoenaed?

 

[Faun]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Sorry son, why didn't the House call them? Schiff (within the rules btw) got to set the rules for the House and McConnell (within the rule btw) gets to do the same in the Senate. Grow up.

Stop lying, they did call them.

Yes, Schiff did call these "witnesses", although it is unclear what, if anything, these men witnessed.

But what is clear is that they claimed Executive Privilege, and would certainly do so if they were called by the Senate in a trial.

The matter is being fought through the courts, and probably won't be resolved until 2022 or so.

So its rather a moot point. Either the libs have the dirt and can prove their charges against the President, or they can't, based upon the evidence they already have.

They're not executives. They're not entitled to executive privilege.

 

[Polishprince]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Sorry son, why didn't the House call them? Schiff (within the rules btw) got to set the rules for the House and McConnell (within the rule btw) gets to do the same in the Senate. Grow up.

Stop lying, they did call them.

Yes, Schiff did call these "witnesses", although it is unclear what, if anything, these men witnessed.

But what is clear is that they claimed Executive Privilege, and would certainly do so if they were called by the Senate in a trial.

The matter is being fought through the courts, and probably won't be resolved until 2022 or so.

So its rather a moot point. Either the libs have the dirt and can prove their charges against the President, or they can't, based upon the evidence they already have.

They're not executives. They're not entitled to executive privilege.

That's certainly your opinion, but the courts have to make that decision, not you or I

And going through the courts takes time.


Although I was thinking, wouldn't it be a kick in the ass to the libs if they made it all the way through the courts, and then the witnesses all plead the 5th?

 

[Faun]

Hisses a lying con tool.

Meanwhile, Impeached Trump remains impeached.

Evidently not. Impeachment is conditional until the articles are presented to the senate. McConnell has set Jan 6 as the day he will deal with impeachment. Likely if he has not been presented with the articles by then, he will ask Chief Justice Roberts to dismiss the impeachment for lack of prosecution.

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

 

[Polishprince]

Evidently not. Impeachment is conditional until the articles are presented to the senate. McConnell has set Jan 6 as the day he will deal with impeachment. Likely if he has not been presented with the articles by then, he will ask Chief Justice Roberts to dismiss the impeachment for lack of prosecution.

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

If these witnesses won't impress anyone to change their vote, why doesn't Nervous Nancy just drop the whole matter and get back to working for the American people? Is she frightened by her Far Left Whackadoodle base?

 

[beautress]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

So you want the accused to provide evidence they are not guilty? Lol hahaha you do have a low IQ

So, in a murder trial;, you would call no witnesses that show your client is innocent?

So far most witnesses have agreed that Trump quid pro quo.

If the Republicans call no one, their vote is 100% political & pisses on the duty as set forth by the US Constitution.

Projecting again? lol

 

[beautress]

Evidently not. Impeachment is conditional until the articles are presented to the senate. McConnell has set Jan 6 as the day he will deal with impeachment. Likely if he has not been presented with the articles by then, he will ask Chief Justice Roberts to dismiss the impeachment for lack of prosecution.

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

 

[Faun]

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

If these witnesses won't impress anyone to change their vote, why doesn't Nervous Nancy just drop the whole matter and get back to working for the American people? Is she frightened by her Far Left Whackadoodle base?

It has nothing to do with the witnesses. Republicans have already declared they are acquitting Impeached Trump even before the trial begins, regardless of what the evidence shows. So why should she rush to that?

 

[Faun]

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

I projected nothing. Republicans said that.

 

[Polishprince]

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

Exactly.

The Democrats in the Senate will vote to remove President Trump REGARDLESS of whether the house managers prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt or not.

Really, they should probably all just recuse themselves, if they had any decency.

 

[Polishprince]

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

If these witnesses won't impress anyone to change their vote, why doesn't Nervous Nancy just drop the whole matter and get back to working for the American people? Is she frightened by her Far Left Whackadoodle base?

It has nothing to do with the witnesses. Republicans have already declared they are acquitting Impeached Trump even before the trial begins, regardless of what the evidence shows. So why should she rush to that?

Move the entire Fake Impeachment behind us, so we can work on the Infrastructure, that the libs "say" they are interested in fixing.

 

[Faun]

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

If these witnesses won't impress anyone to change their vote, why doesn't Nervous Nancy just drop the whole matter and get back to working for the American people? Is she frightened by her Far Left Whackadoodle base?

It has nothing to do with the witnesses. Republicans have already declared they are acquitting Impeached Trump even before the trial begins, regardless of what the evidence shows. So why should she rush to that?

Move the entire Fake Impeachment behind us, so we can work on the Infrastructure, that the libs "say" they are interested in fixing.

Again, they can't do anything now, they're on recess. You'll have to wait until they return.

 

[Faun]

Politico? You are getting desperate!

LOLOL

The disapproval of a lying con tool is noted, laughed at and discarded.

Laughed at and discarded? That's pretty much what any fair minded person does with polls from Politico, Faun! When you're using THEM...it's a sign of desperation!

Hisses a lying con tool.

Meanwhile, Impeached Trump remains impeached.

Evidently not. Impeachment is conditional until the articles are presented to the senate. McConnell has set Jan 6 as the day he will deal with impeachment. Likely if he has not been presented with the articles by then, he will ask Chief Justice Roberts to dismiss the impeachment for lack of prosecution.

Finally somebody is going to quote the Constitution where it states impeachment requires the Senate to be involved.

G'head, quote the Constitution....

<crickets>

 

[JustAGuy1]

The real reason she won't send it over is because ALL Senators will have be there in the sessions....INCLUDING the ones running for Prez. That would just leave who...Joe and Pete?

 

[beautress]

What a whack a doodle you are kid. Why is she afraid to send it over?

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

Exactly.

The Democrats in the Senate will vote to remove President Trump REGARDLESS of whether the house managers prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt or not.

Really, they should probably all just recuse themselves, if they had any decency.

Instead of going home for Christine, Maxine Waters remained in Washington to say nasty things about President Trump while the other go home for respite. She won't let go of her hate for any reason. She's consumed by it.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Because they're on recess. Judt how stupid are you?

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

Exactly.

The Democrats in the Senate will vote to remove President Trump REGARDLESS of whether the house managers prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt or not.

Really, they should probably all just recuse themselves, if they had any decency.

Instead of going home for Christine, Maxine Waters remained in Washington to say nasty things about President Trump while the other go home for respite. She won't let go of her hate for any reason. She's consumed by it.

Give me a break, Trump has made hate acceptable in this country again. He has racism, hate, etc., on the rise in this country and Trump Humpers love it.

 

[Polishprince]

If President Trump is such an existential threat, why did Ms. Pelosi call for a recess at all? Or is that bullshit too?

Because the Republicans already announced they were going to acquit impeached Trump no matter what the evidence would show. So there's no longer an expeditious need to move on to the trisl.

There you go again, projecting Democrat sins onto the backs of Republicans. *yawn*

Exactly.

The Democrats in the Senate will vote to remove President Trump REGARDLESS of whether the house managers prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt or not.

Really, they should probably all just recuse themselves, if they had any decency.

Instead of going home for Christine, Maxine Waters remained in Washington to say nasty things about President Trump while the other go home for respite. She won't let go of her hate for any reason. She's consumed by it.

Give me a break, Trump has made hate acceptable in this country again. He has racism, hate, etc., on the rise in this country and Trump Humpers love it.

What makes you think that racism and hate are "on the rise" at all in America? The only ones saying it are outfits like CNN that make money promoting "hate" events, what else would you expect them to say?