ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,507
- 54,271
Specifically why and specifically how will it stop shootings of 4 or more people in one incident?
Walk us through….specifically.
Walk us through….specifically.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
youre forgetting stealing, borrowing or that they already have a gun,,If someone can't buy the gun, they can't shoot people...
Do you own a gun?If someone can't buy the gun, they can't shoot people...
If someone can't buy a gun, they most likely know it and will not try to buy one.If someone can't buy the gun, they can't shoot people...
If someone can't buy a gun, they most likely know it and will not try to buy one.
They will steal one.
It makes it harder to get a gun. That is progress.youre forgetting stealing, borrowing or that they already have a gun,,
Again, it makes it harder to kill someone. Thats a win.not to mention not even using a gun and using a car instead,,
Fewer guns = fewer gun deaths.dead is dead,,
no it doesnt,, just takes more time and planning,,It makes it harder to get a gun. That is progress.
Again, it makes it harder to kill someone. Thats a win.
Fewer guns = fewer gun deaths.
No.No guns for any law enforcement or private security, right?
NO GUNS MEANS NO GUNS.
During which they aren't killing anyone.no it doesnt,, just takes more time and planning,,
youre also forgetting that most mass shooter can and did pass background checks because they hadnt committed any crimes before they decided to do it,,During which they aren't killing anyone.
Another win for the good guys.
youre also forgetting that most mass shooter can and did pass background checks because they hadnt committed any crimes before they decided to do it,,
Yup. Too many young men who commit those mass shootings.youre also forgetting that most mass shooter can and did pass background checks because they hadnt committed any crimes before they decided to do it,,
no it wouldnt,, it punishes the law abiding over a few bad apples and is unconstitutional,,Raising the minimum age to 21 would be a good thing too.
Everywhere Progs go, carnage follows. During prohibition people drank anyway. There will be underground black markets where weapons are made when you prohibit guns from being sold. Prog failures always must blame other people to compensate for them. Which brings us to the real issue. We do not have plenty for everyone in this world yet. And we are acting in some places like we do and wasting a massive number of resources doing it.It makes it harder to get a gun. That is progress.
Again, it makes it harder to kill someone. Thats a win.
Fewer guns = fewer gun deaths.
Yup. Too many young men who commit those mass shootings.
Perfect reason why they should raise the minimum age for rifles.
Nah. That would never pass.Raise the age to 49 or take away the guns entirely...