Why should there be “universal background checks” for firearms sales and transfers?

No guns for any law enforcement or private security, right?

NO GUNS MEANS NO GUNS.

Cant a bad guy steal a gun from law enforcement or private security and then use it?

If cops and private security are allowed to have guns, they can sell them to bad people. Cops are bad and murder unarmed black people all the time….of course they will sell their guns to bad people.
 
youre also forgetting that most mass shooter can and did pass background checks because they hadnt committed any crimes before they decided to do it,,
Yup. Too many young men who commit those mass shootings.

Perfect reason why they should raise the minimum age for rifles.
 
It makes it harder to get a gun. That is progress.

Again, it makes it harder to kill someone. Thats a win.

Fewer guns = fewer gun deaths.
Everywhere Progs go, carnage follows. During prohibition people drank anyway. There will be underground black markets where weapons are made when you prohibit guns from being sold. Prog failures always must blame other people to compensate for them. Which brings us to the real issue. We do not have plenty for everyone in this world yet. And we are acting in some places like we do and wasting a massive number of resources doing it.
 
Yup. Too many young men who commit those mass shootings.

Perfect reason why they should raise the minimum age for rifles.

Raise the age to 49 or take away the guns entirely, it doesn't matter because at the end of the day the criminals and nutballs are still there. Raising age limits doesn't take away from that at all and doesn't effect the source of the problem because the source of the problem isn't the guns.

People are the problem, not guns. That's why restricting guns will never solve the violence problem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top