Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The recession was cause by the economic deflation of an overinflated demand bubble.For the 1,000th time...You cannot possibly prove that.
I did 1000 times. The recession was caused by the insufficient demand, therefore increasing demand from the government must pull the economy from the slump. Not a rocket science, and only conservatives living in denial would dispute that.
Since the demand was fake to begin with, through idiotic Fed and gubmint meddling, it was only natural that there was going to be severe blowback.
But rather than admit that you economic arsonists care not a fucking wit about the externalities of your know-nothing tinkering with the lives of millions of people, you try to come back and sell yourselves as the best ones to put out the fire.
I accept that authoritarian tyrants are what they are.Not even... It's the core presupposition in your each and every utterance about economic matters.
Yup, telling liberals what their believes are is the part of the denial. You can't accept the world around you and the people around you for what they are.
It means that the artificially inflated housing bubble deflated.The recession was cause by the economic deflationI did 1000 times. The recession was caused by the insufficient demand, therefore increasing demand from the government must pull the economy from the slump. Not a rocket science, and only conservatives living in denial would dispute that.
"Economic deflation", seriously? WTF does it even mean?
It means that the artificially inflated housing bubble deflated.The recession was cause by the economic deflation
"Economic deflation", seriously? WTF does it even mean?
Bullshit. The workforce is growing in absolute terms and in recent months it was growing faster than the population.
Oh really??
In what universe do you live? Obamaland?
U.S. shrinking workforce a worrisome sign | Reuters
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
Oh really??
In what universe do you live? Obamaland?
U.S. shrinking workforce a worrisome sign | Reuters
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire
Oh really??
In what universe do you live? Obamaland?
U.S. shrinking workforce a worrisome sign | Reuters
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
Oh what a crock of shit.....
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire - they were fucking shit canned, couldn't find a job after 2 years and have now been eaten by the singularity.
Not only that but unemployment is epically high amongst the X and Y generations...
Do you realize in order to receive social security benefits an individual would have to have be born in 1947 (actually 1946 given its only February)
Baby Baby boomers are only NOW (the earliest ones) starting to qualify for their SS benefits...
Don't tell me there are 20,000,000 Americans that were born in 1946..
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire
Those born in 1946 are reaching the full retirement age in 2012. They are retiring, so it is understandable that they stopped looking fro work. And in 1946 the population grew by 7.5 millions.
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire
Those born in 1946 are reaching the full retirement age in 2012. They are retiring, so it is understandable that they stopped looking fro work. And in 1946 the population grew by 7.5 millions.
You do realize that your "baby boomer" argument holds ZERO water considering that only the VERY FIRST OF THE FIRST Baby Boomers only now qualify for Social Security..
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
Oh what a crock of shit.....
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire - they were fucking shit canned, couldn't find a job after 2 years and have now been eaten by the singularity.
Not only that but unemployment is epically high amongst the X and Y generations...
Do you realize in order to receive social security benefits an individual would have to have be born in 1947 (actually 1946 given its only February)
Baby Baby boomers are only NOW (the earliest ones) starting to qualify for their SS benefits...
Don't tell me there are 20,000,000 Americans that were born in 1946..
Here are some of those "GROWING" workers being referred to here:
34.2% of people between the age of 16 and 19 are actually still IN the workforce earning a living. Many have simply given up looking with only a small few choosing to persue an added educational degree instead?
71.7% of those between 20 and 24 are currently employed
For Black teens (16-19), unemployment was 42.1% (an increase from 39.6% in November).
For Black female teens, unemployment stood at 34.6% (a decrease from 36.8% in November).
For Black male teens, unemployment was 48.3% (an increase from 42.7% in November)
http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/blackworkers/monthly/bwreport_2012-01-06_43.pdf
Jobless rate has fallen because of dropouts - Washington Times
Those born in 1946 are reaching the full retirement age in 2012. They are retiring, so it is understandable that they stopped looking fro work. And in 1946 the population grew by 7.5 millions.
You do realize that your "baby boomer" argument holds ZERO water considering that only the VERY FIRST OF THE FIRST Baby Boomers only now qualify for Social Security..
No I don't. If you are going to retire in 6 month, or even a year anyway, why would you be looking for a job? And what would you tell to a perspective employer -- please hire me, but keep in mind that I will be gone soon after I finish the orientation?
That report is affected by the demographics -- baby-boomers retire. If you look at the prime-age adults, their work participation is growing:
The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire
Those born in 1946 are reaching the full retirement age in 2012. They are retiring, so it is understandable that they stopped looking fro work. And in 1946 the population grew by 7.5 millions.
You do realize that your "baby boomer" argument holds ZERO water considering that only the VERY FIRST OF THE FIRST Baby Boomers only now qualify for Social Security..
No I don't. If you are going to retire in 6 month, or even a year anyway, why would you be looking for a job? And what would you tell to a perspective employer -- please hire me, but keep in mind that I will be gone soon after I finish the orientation?
What part of "THE FIRST BABY BOOMERS (THOSE BORN BETWEEN JANUARY 1 OF 1946 AND FEBRUARY 19TH OF 1947) ONLY NOW CAN CLAIM SOCIAL SECURITY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?"
No I don't. If you are going to retire in 6 month, or even a year anyway, why would you be looking for a job? And what would you tell to a perspective employer -- please hire me, but keep in mind that I will be gone soon after I finish the orientation?
What part of "THE FIRST BABY BOOMERS (THOSE BORN BETWEEN JANUARY 1 OF 1946 AND FEBRUARY 19TH OF 1947) ONLY NOW CAN CLAIM SOCIAL SECURITY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?"
What part of "you are not looking for a new job if you will retire in 6 months" you don't understand?
The last stimulus was $1 trillion and it failed.
It did not fail, it stopped the economy from sliding deeper into recession.
It wasn't big enough. Neither is what the president plans now. We're in a make or break situation and we need to over-rule the GObP who only want to help their own foreign interests.
If we let them, the Republicans will happily push us into a full depression. That would trigger world wide chaos.
What part of "THE FIRST BABY BOOMERS (THOSE BORN BETWEEN JANUARY 1 OF 1946 AND FEBRUARY 19TH OF 1947) ONLY NOW CAN CLAIM SOCIAL SECURITY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?"
What part of "you are not looking for a new job if you will retire in 6 months" you don't understand?
What part of fallacy do you not understand??
The chart above shows a deeply depressed economy. The US still produce about 1 trillion less in annual GDP than they are capable of. Not only it results in a lot of human suffering, but it also starves the government of tax revenues, creating huge budget deficits.
Therefore we need more stimulus to help the economy closing the gap (which basically means creating more jobs) -- because it will also reduce the deficits.
This would be laughable if it weren't so serious. This post highlights so clearly the delusion of the left. They haven't any clue the relationship between the private sector and the public sector.
It is not a difficult concept: the public sector can only grow at a rate that the revenue from taxation on the private sector allows. If the private sector grows exponentially, say at the rate of $200 billion a month deficits, somewhere around $14 trillion in national debt--a majority held by your own central bank--it will undoubtedly cause further devastation on the economy.
Also, this childish argument that had the stimulus not been passed the economy would be worse--proving a negative--is naive. Let me use that same logic on you. Had the Bush administration not allowed enhanced interrogation techniques America would be in a much worse situation, possibly even another terrorist attack on American soil.
The fact is all of the promises made and reasons given to pass the stimulus act have been proven to be lies and misrepresentations . Even liberals admit it was a failure, but then absurdly turn around and promise it was because it was too small and wasn't administered correctly.
These people are quite obviously either morons or intentionally pursuing the destruction of this country.
'Course Bush, Bernanke and Paulson giving the banks nearly a trillion dollars and not even specifying how they were to use it was A OK. A Rose By Any Other Name Is Yet As Sweet!
This would be laughable if it weren't so serious. This post highlights so clearly the delusion of the left. They haven't any clue the relationship between the private sector and the public sector.
It is not a difficult concept: the public sector can only grow at a rate that the revenue from taxation on the private sector allows. If the private sector grows exponentially, say at the rate of $200 billion a month deficits, somewhere around $14 trillion in national debt--a majority held by your own central bank--it will undoubtedly cause further devastation on the economy.
Also, this childish argument that had the stimulus not been passed the economy would be worse--proving a negative--is naive. Let me use that same logic on you. Had the Bush administration not allowed enhanced interrogation techniques America would be in a much worse situation, possibly even another terrorist attack on American soil.
The fact is all of the promises made and reasons given to pass the stimulus act have been proven to be lies and misrepresentations . Even liberals admit it was a failure, but then absurdly turn around and promise it was because it was too small and wasn't administered correctly.
These people are quite obviously either morons or intentionally pursuing the destruction of this country.
'Course Bush, Bernanke and Paulson giving the banks nearly a trillion dollars and not even specifying how they were to use it was A OK. A Rose By Any Other Name Is Yet As Sweet!
Giving?
'Course Bush, Bernanke and Paulson giving the banks nearly a trillion dollars and not even specifying how they were to use it was A OK. A Rose By Any Other Name Is Yet As Sweet!
Giving?
Yeah that's the idiot LEft. When Bush's administration LOANED banks money they had to repay that was giving it. When Obama's administration makes loans to the likes of Solyndra where the taxpayer will be on the hook for all of it if it fails then that's "investment." See the difference?
As you can see, I already gave up.The first to get shit canned were the baby boomers - they didn't retire
Those born in 1946 are reaching the full retirement age in 2012. They are retiring, so it is understandable that they stopped looking fro work. And in 1946 the population grew by 7.5 millions.
You implied the drop in our workforce was because THEY ALREADY DID...
Basically you just made a bunch of shit up and now are attempting to save face..
How does it feel to be an Obamabot??
How does it feel to reject reality because it makes you feel better about yourself and your support of the tyrant liar Obamafuck??
