Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you are blaming false documentation...
Well the burden of proof is then on the employer... He is breaking the law hiring them so he has to show proof that he took reasonable steps to not break the law... That is why companies take copies of peoples various documentation...
Under your premise that if someone ends up operating on a person in the hospital with no qualifications. The hospital is fully in the clear when they say the guy gave us false documentation and we kept no copy of it... Under your premise the Hospital has no liability..
What the fuck are you babbling about? Employers have to check work status. That is the law. So, you would def know if you are hiring illegals.
Try not to be a bigger moron than you already are.
Keep trying to justify why you would hire illegals. Man, you retards keep proving over and over again that you are racist hypocrites.
It didn't have to be written for children of immigrants born here, legal or illegal, because they already had birthright citizenship...decided at the time of our founder's lives.
Any one born here under our jurisdiction were citizens at birth, regardless of parent's status...unless a diplomat child born here.
I'm talking about after the ruling. Besides, this is a fantasy proposed bill, not a court case.
It was written for anyone born in the United States unless your suggesting no one but descendants of Black Americans are actual citizens. Is that what you're arguing?That's never been challenged in court which it needs to be. The 14th needs to be settled once and for all. Again, you can't write an amendment for something that wasn't there at the time. The 14th was written for offspring of former slaves, not illegals getting into this country to have children.
How many white and black people broke into this nation without consent from the people?It's all, or none. I'm sure that black and white US families would be shocked to discover that their kids need to apply for citizenship.
Are you sure about that? All good real core Americans seem to be pretty fed-up with raising Mexico’s children.I'm talking about after the ruling. Besides, this is a fantasy proposed bill, not a court case.
This has to do with being Born in the USA Bruce.How many white and black people broke into this nation without consent from the people?
Ooo, the oldAre you sure about that? All good real core Americans seem to be pretty fed-up with raising Mexico’s children.
I don’t think you are understanding Guadalupe.This has to do with being Born in the USA Bruce.
It worked out like attempts to ban abortion did for years.Ooo, the old
H.R.140 - Birthright Citizenship Act of 2021
How did that work out?
I don’t think you are understanding Guadalupe.
You see, nobody has a problem with any children born here to LEGAL parents. Good Americans simply don’t like the idea of America being the dumping ground for the litters that illegal aliens produce.
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
www.heritage.org
www.archives.gov
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
The 14th was authored for and aimed at previously enslaved people….Nobody sane would believe it was written in such a way for Mexico to fuck us blind. The Constitution is not a international document to benefit foreigners. It was written for the sole purpose of protecting Americans.Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment
What’s the citizenship status of the children of illegal aliens? That question has spurred quite a debate over the 14th Amendment lately, with the news that several states—including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia, and South Carolina—may launch efforts to deny automatic citizenship to...
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Civil Rights (1868)
EnlargeDownload Link Citation: The House Joint Resolution Proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, June 16, 1866; Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 1789-1999; General Records of the United States Government; Record Group 11; National Archives. View All Pages in the National...
You clearly didn't read the link I attached. Congress' power to revoke citizenship is limited. Birthright citizenship isn't even related to the point your trying to make. Revoking it would have no impact on the power of Congress over the naturalization process.All of them you moron. Kind of hard to have a first amendment right after the political party you're against wins power, decides you're no longer a citizen, and deports your ass.
Yep, that's what we're doing by questioning its value. Sorry.Take it up with the people who wrote it. It doesn't make any note of anchor babies.
You got nothing. You're just another partisan douchebag. Seeya.I was offering up legal justifications, morality and philosophy are subjective which makes them empty as justifications go. They carry as much weight as any assholes opinion.
mkay. Are you denying birthright citizenship, or just the wording?There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."
So how does an employer check the status and the possibility that it's not fake? Tell us how it's done genius.
The employer gets a proper ID, checks his SS number, and that's all there is to it. If everything matches up, then as far as the employer is concerned, the applicant is legal.
Another day, another retard who doesn't know the first thing about the topic it is arguing about.
