Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The President does not request the Justice department to draw up a FISA Warrant for him....that is utterly ridiculous.
Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Trump spouts off crap without evidence and his followers believe it, while when Obama and all the intelligence agencies say Russia hacked the DNC and meddled in the election they won't believe it until they see evidence...
Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.
So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.
Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Trump will be stronger because of this....you are still not understanding what we the people did last November.....Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything of this serious magnitude without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Trump spouts off crap without evidence and his followers believe it, while when Obama and all the intelligence agencies say Russia hacked the DNC and meddled in the election they won't believe it until they see evidence...
Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.
So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.
Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Trump is gaming Obama....and Obama knows this, and also knows he can't win.....Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything of this serious magnitude without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
You mean POTUS Trump?Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?
Do you deny wiretapping was ordered against a presidential candidate?Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.
So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.
Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.
So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.
Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
You mean POTUS Trump?Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?
Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.
Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....
Poor Seth....he died for Bernie Sanders and you democrats shun him....Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....
You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...
You're delusional.
You need to walk out of the democrat swamp....it's consuming you.....You mean POTUS Trump?Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.
If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?
Keep it up, when Trump become the very first POTUS ever impeached AND removed from office, you will never hear the end of it.
Do you deny presidential candidate Trump was wiretapped during the campaign?Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.
Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....
You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...
You're delusional.
You need to walk out of the democrat swamp....it's consuming you.....You mean POTUS Trump?Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.
Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?
Keep it up, when Trump become the very first POTUS ever impeached AND removed from office, you will never hear the end of it.
Do you deny presidential candidate Trump was wiretapped during the campaign?Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.
So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.
Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?
That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.
I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....
You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...
You're delusional.
