Will The Democrats Finally Admit They Are a Socialist Party?

[Camp]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

 

[kaz]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

 

[frigidweirdo]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Because it's a bad question. It's a question that I barely understand.

You take two democrats. Maybe they'll disagree with a lot of stuff. I don't know, I'M NOT A DEMOCRAT, so why would I be able to tell you. No doubt Democrats disagree on many things.

I have been a member of a political party before (it will remain unnamed, just to save you the effort of asking) and I disagreed fundamentally with a lot of the people who were there. So, with the Democrats being so large, I'd say they disagree.

But what just popped into my head was the Iran deal. One Congressmen disagreed with Obama about it. I could look for more, but I don't see what the point would be of even answering such a question seeing as it's so vague.

Europe would be nice though. I was there at the beginning of the year in the south.

 

[kaz]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Because it's a bad question. It's a question that I barely understand.

You take two democrats. Maybe they'll disagree with a lot of stuff. I don't know, I'M NOT A DEMOCRAT, so why would I be able to tell you. No doubt Democrats disagree on many things.

I have been a member of a political party before (it will remain unnamed, just to save you the effort of asking) and I disagreed fundamentally with a lot of the people who were there. So, with the Democrats being so large, I'd say they disagree.

But what just popped into my head was the Iran deal. One Congressmen disagreed with Obama about it. I could look for more, but I don't see what the point would be of even answering such a question seeing as it's so vague.

Europe would be nice though. I was there at the beginning of the year in the south.

Asking you to name a significant issue Democrats disagree on is "vague?"



As for why I'm asking you about it, you jumped into my comment on the Democrat's side, I mean duh. And you cam back with "one congressmen disagreed with Obama" about the Iran deal? That's the first thing that popped into your mind across the entire spectrum? One congressman?

As for Europe, so last time I was there a few weeks ago, we had lots of early morning US discussions, like 2-5 am. I was in the Netherlands. You just a night owl?

 

[Camp]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

 

[NYcarbineer]

So one guy makes the Democrats socialists.

Does that mean one racist makes the Republicans racists? One Fascist makes the Republicans Fascists? etc etc etc????

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

So what is the socialism that all Democrats agree on?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Don't you also want to get Democrats to admit they support same sex marriage, while we're at it?

lolol

 

[kaz]

No, they all make them socialists. Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

So now you are barfing links. I asked you, Holmes. How hard is it to just address the question if it's that clear to you?

As for your links, you came up with two issues where they couldn't name a half dozen Democrats in one chamber and zero leaders or presidential candidates who disagreed on anything. And you consider that diverse while the Republicans are to you voting partisan. I'm just laughing at you

 

[Camp]

Oh, jeez, any negative word and it's automatically a Democrat. You people must have great fun.

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

So now you are barfing links. I asked you, Holmes. How hard is it to just address the question if it's that clear to you?

As for your links, you came up with two issues where they couldn't name a half dozen Democrats in one chamber and zero leaders or presidential candidates who disagreed on anything. And you consider that diverse while the Republicans are to you voting partisan. I'm just laughing at you

You asked a specific question and I provided you with two examples. Now you want to raise the bar and whine that there isn't enough disagreement. You went from no disagreements to not enough disagreements. There was a long list of local Democrats that are pro life. Limited number in the Congress, but they are there. On gun rights, plenty of Democrats are pro gun. Enough to prevent passing gun rights legislation in Congress.
Something tells me no matter how many examples of Democrats not always agreeing on issues are provided to you, you will find a way to raise the bar and refuse to admit you are wrong. Heck, you are whining that links to prove a point were provided to you. If no links had been provided you would be whining that no links were provided.

 

[kaz]

Funny how you disagreed with my post, yet you couldn't answer the question. Don't worry, none of you can. You gave the stereotype liberal answer. What? That's ridiculous! Example? Crickets...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

BTW, I'll be back in Europe again next week, we can resume our middle of the night debates

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

So now you are barfing links. I asked you, Holmes. How hard is it to just address the question if it's that clear to you?

As for your links, you came up with two issues where they couldn't name a half dozen Democrats in one chamber and zero leaders or presidential candidates who disagreed on anything. And you consider that diverse while the Republicans are to you voting partisan. I'm just laughing at you

You asked a specific question and I provided you with two examples. Now you want to raise the bar and whine that there isn't enough disagreement. You went from no disagreements to not enough disagreements. There was a long list of local Democrats that are pro life. Limited number in the Congress, but they are there. On gun rights, plenty of Democrats are pro gun. Enough to prevent passing gun rights legislation in Congress.
Something tells me no matter how many examples of Democrats not always agreeing on issues are provided to you, you will find a way to raise the bar and refuse to admit you are wrong. Heck, you are whining that links to prove a point were provided to you. If no links had been provided you would be whining that no links were provided.

Even your article said the 3 Democrats in each chamber who disagreed on each issue had no choice because of where they ran.

Seriously, you are so partisan you think that naming two issues with 3 people in each chamber who disagree in districts their survival is at stake makes your party an intellelectually open and diverse party? That's your standard?

And the Republicans are partisan while they are split into several factions and they have 17 candidates who can't agree on anything.



QED, thank you for proving my point

 

[frigidweirdo]

Asking you to name a significant issue Democrats disagree on is "vague?"



As for why I'm asking you about it, you jumped into my comment on the Democrat's side, I mean duh. And you cam back with "one congressmen disagreed with Obama" about the Iran deal? That's the first thing that popped into your mind across the entire spectrum? One congressman?

As for Europe, so last time I was there a few weeks ago, we had lots of early morning US discussions, like 2-5 am. I was in the Netherlands. You just a night owl?

Yes. Very vague.

What is the democratic party? I mean, it's people all over the spectrum. Socialists, Communists, through to people who are kind of conservative too. Which people within the party are you actually talking about? Like i said, you'd easily find two people who would argue the toss over everything, every policy.

Yeah, one congressman. Why? Because your question was VAGUE. All that is required to answer your question is to find one person who identifies themselves as democrat who has criticised or opposed another for any policy at all.

I'm not a Democrat, and I really don't see why I need to be going around showing instances of something that should be bloody obvious. When I do provide that you then criticise me for giving one example.

What the fuck?

I'm what I am. But what I am is someone who doesn't give ammunition for the nutters on such a site. Too many people will pick up on any piece of information about you and then use it to "destroy" your argument. So, I'll leave it up to your imagination.

 

[Camp]

Democrats disagree on just about all issue's. All you have to do is look at the voting tally's in Congress. They vote as a partisan unit far less than Republicans, at least in the last several years.

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

So now you are barfing links. I asked you, Holmes. How hard is it to just address the question if it's that clear to you?

As for your links, you came up with two issues where they couldn't name a half dozen Democrats in one chamber and zero leaders or presidential candidates who disagreed on anything. And you consider that diverse while the Republicans are to you voting partisan. I'm just laughing at you

You asked a specific question and I provided you with two examples. Now you want to raise the bar and whine that there isn't enough disagreement. You went from no disagreements to not enough disagreements. There was a long list of local Democrats that are pro life. Limited number in the Congress, but they are there. On gun rights, plenty of Democrats are pro gun. Enough to prevent passing gun rights legislation in Congress.
Something tells me no matter how many examples of Democrats not always agreeing on issues are provided to you, you will find a way to raise the bar and refuse to admit you are wrong. Heck, you are whining that links to prove a point were provided to you. If no links had been provided you would be whining that no links were provided.

Even your article said the 3 Democrats in each chamber who disagreed on each issue had no choice because of where they ran.

Seriously, you are so partisan you think that naming two issues with 3 people in each chamber who disagree in districts their survival is at stake makes your party an intellelectually open and diverse party? That's your standard?

And the Republicans are partisan while they are split into several factions and they have 17 candidates who can't agree on anything.



QED, thank you for proving my point

The Democrats are not my party. I answered your question because I wanted to show how wrong your concept was. I did not expect you to become so dishonest. The ideas that all Democrats are in lockstep together on all issues is as foolish as to make that claim about Republicans. Such a claim is just an effort to portray and create a stereotype and promote the demonizing of one party or another. Your way of thinking is just the result of successful propagandizing. To dense and programmed to realize that compromise and conciliation is workable between differing ideologies when accomplishments are goals. The propagandist wants you to be robot like and you are one of the successes.

 

[kaz]

Asking you to name a significant issue Democrats disagree on is "vague?"



As for why I'm asking you about it, you jumped into my comment on the Democrat's side, I mean duh. And you cam back with "one congressmen disagreed with Obama" about the Iran deal? That's the first thing that popped into your mind across the entire spectrum? One congressman?

As for Europe, so last time I was there a few weeks ago, we had lots of early morning US discussions, like 2-5 am. I was in the Netherlands. You just a night owl?

Yes. Very vague.

What is the democratic party? I mean, it's people all over the spectrum. Socialists, Communists, through to people who are kind of conservative too. Which people within the party are you actually talking about? Like i said, you'd easily find two people who would argue the toss over everything, every policy.

Yeah, one congressman. Why? Because your question was VAGUE. All that is required to answer your question is to find one person who identifies themselves as democrat who has criticised or opposed another for any policy at all.

I'm not a Democrat, and I really don't see why I need to be going around showing instances of something that should be bloody obvious. When I do provide that you then criticise me for giving one example.

What the fuck?

I'm what I am. But what I am is someone who doesn't give ammunition for the nutters on such a site. Too many people will pick up on any piece of information about you and then use it to "destroy" your argument. So, I'll leave it up to your imagination.

Why don't you not jump into discussions defending the Democrats if you don't want questions on your defense of the Democrats?

As for when you said, "What is the democratic party? I mean, it's people all over the spectrum. Socialists, Communists, through to people who are kind of conservative too," all the more reason it should be easy to show significant disagreement in the Democrat party, yet none of you can. The Democrats are not a healthy party, they are ideologically rigid and uncompromising

 

[kaz]

They do? They disagree on "just about all issues?" And yet you still can't name any? LOL.

And while you can't actually name any "significant issue that Democrats disagree on," you still go to they are a "partisan unit far less than Republicans," LOL. The kool-aid is strong in this one. BTW, check out the Obamacare vote if you want to see a partisan bloc across both chambers...

Here is the question you whiffed on again: "Name any significant issue that Democrats disagree on"

democratsforlife.org/index.php/elected-pro-life-dems/pro-life-democrats

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/04/18/the-democrats-who-helped-kill-gun-legislation/

So now you are barfing links. I asked you, Holmes. How hard is it to just address the question if it's that clear to you?

As for your links, you came up with two issues where they couldn't name a half dozen Democrats in one chamber and zero leaders or presidential candidates who disagreed on anything. And you consider that diverse while the Republicans are to you voting partisan. I'm just laughing at you

You asked a specific question and I provided you with two examples. Now you want to raise the bar and whine that there isn't enough disagreement. You went from no disagreements to not enough disagreements. There was a long list of local Democrats that are pro life. Limited number in the Congress, but they are there. On gun rights, plenty of Democrats are pro gun. Enough to prevent passing gun rights legislation in Congress.
Something tells me no matter how many examples of Democrats not always agreeing on issues are provided to you, you will find a way to raise the bar and refuse to admit you are wrong. Heck, you are whining that links to prove a point were provided to you. If no links had been provided you would be whining that no links were provided.

Even your article said the 3 Democrats in each chamber who disagreed on each issue had no choice because of where they ran.

Seriously, you are so partisan you think that naming two issues with 3 people in each chamber who disagree in districts their survival is at stake makes your party an intellelectually open and diverse party? That's your standard?

And the Republicans are partisan while they are split into several factions and they have 17 candidates who can't agree on anything.



QED, thank you for proving my point

The Democrats are not my party

Communist Party?

I answered your question because I wanted to show how wrong your concept was. I did not expect you to become so dishonest. The ideas that all Democrats are in lockstep together on all issues is as foolish as to make that claim about Republicans. Such a claim is just an effort to portray and create a stereotype and promote the demonizing of one party or another. Your way of thinking is just the result of successful propagandizing. To dense and programmed to realize that compromise and conciliation is workable between differing ideologies when accomplishments are goals. The propagandist wants you to be robot like and you are one of the successes.

You say the "The ideas that all Democrats are in lockstep together on all issues is as foolish as to make that claim about Republicans."

Bull, you gave two examples of issues where three people in each chamber disagreed with the majority. The Republicans are split on almost all issues with Tea Party, social conservative, establishment and libertarian leaning camps. And you say that's like your two go to issues spanning 12 Democrats total for both houses and both issues.

LOL, not a Democrat. Another one of you. You're as shallow as the kid with cookie crumbs all over him and his hand in the jar denying he took a cookie when he mother walked into the kitchen...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Asking you to name a significant issue Democrats disagree on is "vague?"



As for why I'm asking you about it, you jumped into my comment on the Democrat's side, I mean duh. And you cam back with "one congressmen disagreed with Obama" about the Iran deal? That's the first thing that popped into your mind across the entire spectrum? One congressman?

As for Europe, so last time I was there a few weeks ago, we had lots of early morning US discussions, like 2-5 am. I was in the Netherlands. You just a night owl?

Yes. Very vague.

What is the democratic party? I mean, it's people all over the spectrum. Socialists, Communists, through to people who are kind of conservative too. Which people within the party are you actually talking about? Like i said, you'd easily find two people who would argue the toss over everything, every policy.

Yeah, one congressman. Why? Because your question was VAGUE. All that is required to answer your question is to find one person who identifies themselves as democrat who has criticised or opposed another for any policy at all.

I'm not a Democrat, and I really don't see why I need to be going around showing instances of something that should be bloody obvious. When I do provide that you then criticise me for giving one example.

What the fuck?

I'm what I am. But what I am is someone who doesn't give ammunition for the nutters on such a site. Too many people will pick up on any piece of information about you and then use it to "destroy" your argument. So, I'll leave it up to your imagination.

Why don't you not jump into discussions defending the Democrats if you don't want questions on your defense of the Democrats?

As for when you said, "What is the democratic party? I mean, it's people all over the spectrum. Socialists, Communists, through to people who are kind of conservative too," all the more reason it should be easy to show significant disagreement in the Democrat party, yet none of you can. The Democrats are not a healthy party, they are ideologically rigid and uncompromising

There is particularly uniform, widespread Democratic opposition to nationalizing all US industry.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There is particularly uniform, widespread Democratic opposition to nationalizing all US industry.

100% stupid as always. All the idiotic arguments they used for Obamacare can be applied to all industries.

 

[NYcarbineer]

There is particularly uniform, widespread Democratic opposition to nationalizing all US industry.

100% stupid as always. All the idiotic arguments they used for Obamacare can be applied to all industries.

Really? Now how many private businesses were nationalized under Obamacare?

 

[NYcarbineer]

So why don't some of you tell us what makes the Democratic Party a socialist party?

Afterall, it's your accusation. Back it up.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There is particularly uniform, widespread Democratic opposition to nationalizing all US industry.

100% stupid as always. All the idiotic arguments they used for Obamacare can be applied to all industries.

Really? Now how many private businesses were nationalized under Obamacare?

dear, the modern soviet liberal knows he's too stupid to own and manage a business so instead he seeks control from a distance with taxes and regulations. Its really called crony socialism or fascism.

With capitalist health care prices would be 20% of what they are now and life expectancy would be increased 10-20 years.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So why don't some of you tell us what makes the Democratic Party a socialist party?

Afterall, it's your accusation. Back it up.

100% stupid as always!! Sanders is an open socialist and Obama their president voted to left of Sanders in the Senate. Cased closed you idiot!!