Zone1 Worry about God's judgement of you

For tax purposes only, not free exercise purposes.


It's free exercise of religion, not organized religion.

And the founders probably weren't expecting publicly funded schools, never mind Pride crap.
The founders said, seperation of church and state. That is what they meant. They came from countries where thye government dictated what church you should belong to.
 
Some actions considered sins by certain churches but not all include: eating certain foods during specific religious periods (like shellfish for some Christians), dancing, wearing revealing clothing, practicing certain forms of birth control, premarital sex, same-sex relationships, and the celebration of certain holidays; with variations in interpretation largely depending on denomination and cultural context.
 
Some actions considered sins by certain churches but not all include: eating certain foods during specific religious periods (like shellfish for some Christians), dancing, wearing revealing clothing, practicing certain forms of birth control, premarital sex, same-sex relationships, and the celebration of certain holidays; with variations in interpretation largely depending on denomination and cultural context.
Real Gospel preaching churches will not celebrate premarital, or same sex marriages. I also know of no church that would not be against revealing clothing.
 
The founders said, seperation of church and state. That is what they meant. They came from countries where thye government dictated what church you should belong to.

And dictated which churches could be shut down or outlawed.

And at the time of the Constitution the intent was only for the FEDERAL government to not be able to establish and official religion, States were still allowed to do so until the 14th amendment.
 
And dictated which churches could be shut down or outlawed.

And at the time of the Constitution the intent was only for the FEDERAL government to not be able to establish and official religion, States were still allowed to do so until the 14th amendment.
What is your point. The Constitution and it's ammendments have upheld seperation of church and state. That is even more important in a country of 340 million people.
 
What is your point. The Constitution and it's ammendments have upheld seperation of church and state. That is even more important in a country of 340 million people.

First, spell check is your friend.

Second, Courts uphold things, try to be a bit more coherent.

Lastly, the restriction is on establishing a religion, and comes with the adder that you can't inhibit free exercise.

Lefties tend to forget about that part.
 
First, spell check is your friend.

Second, Courts uphold things, try to be a bit more coherent.

Lastly, the restriction is on establishing a religion, and comes with the adder that you can't inhibit free exercise.

Lefties tend to forget about that part.
You are a dog chasing it's tell.
If what you say is true, it should be taken before a court of law. Why hasn't it.
 
Can't be, those words are not present in the constitution.
The words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the U.S. Constitution, but the concept is enshrined in the very first freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Known as the establishment clause, the opening lines of the First Amendment ...

You do not seem to understand the principles laid out in the Constitution. If you had to take a new citizen test, you would not pass.
 
The words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the U.S. Constitution, but the concept is enshrined in the very first freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Known as the establishment clause, the opening lines of the First Amendment ...

You do not seem to understand the principles laid out in the Constitution. If you had to take a new citizen test, you would not pass.

and as usual for a lefty, you leave the last part out.
 
The government is not saying the LGBT movement is a religion. You may be the only human to do so.

When the movement tries to put their advocacy into public schools, and that advocacy goes beyond just tolerance, they should be treated like a religion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top