🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

1 in 6 Draw Welfare in Predominantly Red States

Each individual company has to determine when taxes are too high… It's not up to the federal government. The federal government knows nothing of business… Try and keep up fester



Yes Cupcake, Gov't can't just decide to tell the Corps who don't want to play by RULES we set up to go fuck themselves if they don't want to create jobs in the US and instead off shore the jobs WHILE deducting those expenses (which Dems tried to stop and the GOP blocked)?



Grow a brain Cupcake
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.
 
Republicans will do nothing for the poor.
Trying to create a positive pro growth business environment has everything to do with helping the poor. More jobs.

What does not help the poor is flooding the country with no-skill workers that compete for entry level jobs.
Republicans will, as you say, do favors for businessmen and corporations.
 
Make the rich pay their fair share... that's how you fix the problem.

They already pay more than their fair share. The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 70% of all collected income taxes. Fair actually means everybody pay an equal amount. Given the fact nearly half of the people in this country pay no income tax at all, fair would be making them start paying a little.

Are you a little slow? Is that the learning disability you have there... go back and read what I said slowly, and then have someone help you with the big words.

That stunt is getting old Joe. You already tried to use that three or four times. It doesn't work anymore; it really never did.

Guy, yes, while I'm sure you think your racism is a disability, it really isn't, bud.

Comprehension problems again?

Seriously, if there's a government restriction that keeps you from working, it's probably there for a good reason.

Bureaucracies are never a good reason for anything. If government restricted you from 95% of work in your field, I'm sure you'd have a different take on that. They keep making it harder and harder every year for me to work any job, and I'm sure they will stop me completely even though I'm capable of working.

The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.



INCOME TAXES AGAIN HUH CUPCAKE?

"The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 70% of all collected income taxes."

TOP 10% MADE 45.87% OF ALL US INCOME

Paid 69.80% of INCOME taxes (which are only 25% of ALL Gov't taxes)

MIN of $127,695 AGI, AND paid a 20.75% Avg Tax rate


A 2007 study by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez calculated effective tax rates for various income groups.

For people whose income ranked between the top 1 percent and top 0.5 percent, the effective tax rate for individual, corporate, payroll and estate was 34.0 percent in 1960, 36.1 percent in 1970, 37.6 percent in 1980, 31.5 percent in 1990, 35.7 percent in 2000 and 31.3 percent in 2004.

For those earning between the top 0.1 percent and 0.5 percent of the income curve, the numbers were 41.4 percent in 1960, 44.6 percent in 1970, 43.0 percent in 1980, 33.0 percent in 1990, 38.4 percent in 2000 and 33.0 percent in 2004.

For those earning between 0.01 percent and 0.1 percent, the rates were 55.3 percent in 1960, 59.1 percent in 1970, 51.0 percent in 1980, 34.3 percent in 1990, 40.2 percent in 2000 and 34.1 percent in 2004.

Finally, for those in the top 0.01 percent of the income distribution, the effective tax rate was 71.4 percent in 1960, 74.6 percent in 1970, 59.3 percent in 1980, 35.4 percent in 1990, 40.8 percent in 2000 and 34.7 percent in 2004.

Barack Obama says tax rates are lowest since 1950s for CEOs, hedge fund managers



The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston

Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston



Those who advocate for tax cuts for the highest earners and erroneously claim that the wealthy are overtaxed focus solely on the federal personal income tax, while ignoring all of the other taxes that Americans pay. As the table to the right illustrates, the total share of taxes (federal, state, and local) that will be paid by Americans across the economic spectrum in 2016 is roughly equal to their total share of income


whopayshares2016lq.jpg


whopaysrates2016lq.jpg



Who Pays Taxes in America in 2016? | CTJReports

Irrelevant. The point still stands.

We all (including the wealthy) pay those taxes. But payroll tax is money you will likely get back.

Social Security: you will get more than you pay into the program if you live the average lifespan.

Medicare: again, you will get more back than you pay into if you live the average lifespan.

FICA: A cute name for an additional SS tax; again, you will get that all back.

City taxes: You get that back through city services such as garbage collection, street lights, paved and maintained streets and roads, police and emergency services.

State taxes: again, paved roads, emergency services, new highways, maintained highways, state contributions to Medicaid, state workers pay and benefits......
This is true, and the problem with socialist entitlement programs less people are putting less into a programs, more people are taking more out of the same programs… That's a loser every time

More than that is the fact the wage earners who support those programs don't use most of them. The wealthy will never need any social safety net programs. They need the military no less than a poor person. They use the same roads and bridges as the poor and middle-class. They don't use education money because they likely send their children to private school or city schools that don't use federal money. They likely don't use veterans benefits such as the VA.

Right, the wealthy don't need a first class US H/C system, or defense department, or functioning court system, or educational system, etc *shaking head*



HINT THEY BENEFIT WHEN THEY HIRE PEOPLE WHO GET THOSE THINGS DUMBASS!


The perfect example of CONservative policy is a 3rd world nation where very few rich live behind walls, a very small middle class and a HUGE working poor population!

Kansas-Experiment.gif



e73b5f43ffb9cafc5764b36b433ddc23.jpg
 
Yes Cupcake, Gov't can't just decide to tell the Corps who don't want to play by RULES we set up to go fuck themselves if they don't want to create jobs in the US and instead off shore the jobs WHILE deducting those expenses (which Dems tried to stop and the GOP blocked)?



Grow a brain Cupcake
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


CATO, THAT RIGHT WING GROUP DEFINED IT CUPCAKE

Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget
Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget
 
Republicans will do nothing for the poor.
Trying to create a positive pro growth business environment has everything to do with helping the poor. More jobs.

What does not help the poor is flooding the country with no-skill workers that compete for entry level jobs.
Republicans will, as you say, do favors for businessmen and corporations.
They haven't done me any favors, but then again I don't rely on government as a savior. I actually avoid government contracts. To much BS involved. Besides, that stuff is rigged by the Democrats in my area.
 
Yes Cupcake, Gov't can't just decide to tell the Corps who don't want to play by RULES we set up to go fuck themselves if they don't want to create jobs in the US and instead off shore the jobs WHILE deducting those expenses (which Dems tried to stop and the GOP blocked)?



Grow a brain Cupcake
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
 
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester
 
They already pay more than their fair share. The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 70% of all collected income taxes. Fair actually means everybody pay an equal amount. Given the fact nearly half of the people in this country pay no income tax at all, fair would be making them start paying a little.

That stunt is getting old Joe. You already tried to use that three or four times. It doesn't work anymore; it really never did.

Bureaucracies are never a good reason for anything. If government restricted you from 95% of work in your field, I'm sure you'd have a different take on that. They keep making it harder and harder every year for me to work any job, and I'm sure they will stop me completely even though I'm capable of working.

The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.



INCOME TAXES AGAIN HUH CUPCAKE?

"The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 70% of all collected income taxes."

TOP 10% MADE 45.87% OF ALL US INCOME

Paid 69.80% of INCOME taxes (which are only 25% of ALL Gov't taxes)

MIN of $127,695 AGI, AND paid a 20.75% Avg Tax rate


A 2007 study by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez calculated effective tax rates for various income groups.

For people whose income ranked between the top 1 percent and top 0.5 percent, the effective tax rate for individual, corporate, payroll and estate was 34.0 percent in 1960, 36.1 percent in 1970, 37.6 percent in 1980, 31.5 percent in 1990, 35.7 percent in 2000 and 31.3 percent in 2004.

For those earning between the top 0.1 percent and 0.5 percent of the income curve, the numbers were 41.4 percent in 1960, 44.6 percent in 1970, 43.0 percent in 1980, 33.0 percent in 1990, 38.4 percent in 2000 and 33.0 percent in 2004.

For those earning between 0.01 percent and 0.1 percent, the rates were 55.3 percent in 1960, 59.1 percent in 1970, 51.0 percent in 1980, 34.3 percent in 1990, 40.2 percent in 2000 and 34.1 percent in 2004.

Finally, for those in the top 0.01 percent of the income distribution, the effective tax rate was 71.4 percent in 1960, 74.6 percent in 1970, 59.3 percent in 1980, 35.4 percent in 1990, 40.8 percent in 2000 and 34.7 percent in 2004.

Barack Obama says tax rates are lowest since 1950s for CEOs, hedge fund managers



The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston

Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston



Those who advocate for tax cuts for the highest earners and erroneously claim that the wealthy are overtaxed focus solely on the federal personal income tax, while ignoring all of the other taxes that Americans pay. As the table to the right illustrates, the total share of taxes (federal, state, and local) that will be paid by Americans across the economic spectrum in 2016 is roughly equal to their total share of income


whopayshares2016lq.jpg


whopaysrates2016lq.jpg



Who Pays Taxes in America in 2016? | CTJReports

Irrelevant. The point still stands.

We all (including the wealthy) pay those taxes. But payroll tax is money you will likely get back.

Social Security: you will get more than you pay into the program if you live the average lifespan.

Medicare: again, you will get more back than you pay into if you live the average lifespan.

FICA: A cute name for an additional SS tax; again, you will get that all back.

City taxes: You get that back through city services such as garbage collection, street lights, paved and maintained streets and roads, police and emergency services.

State taxes: again, paved roads, emergency services, new highways, maintained highways, state contributions to Medicaid, state workers pay and benefits......
This is true, and the problem with socialist entitlement programs less people are putting less into a programs, more people are taking more out of the same programs… That's a loser every time

More than that is the fact the wage earners who support those programs don't use most of them. The wealthy will never need any social safety net programs. They need the military no less than a poor person. They use the same roads and bridges as the poor and middle-class. They don't use education money because they likely send their children to private school or city schools that don't use federal money. They likely don't use veterans benefits such as the VA.

Right, the wealthy don't need a first class US H/C system, or defense department, or functioning court system, or educational system, etc *shaking head*



HINT THEY BENEFIT WHEN THEY HIRE PEOPLE WHO GET THOSE THINGS DUMBASS!


The perfect example of CONservative policy is a 3rd world nation where very few rich live behind walls, a very small middle class and a HUGE working poor population!

Kansas-Experiment.gif



e73b5f43ffb9cafc5764b36b433ddc23.jpg
Lol! Where did you get the ridiculous Kansas meme. Funny stuff. Completely wrong, but not unexpected from a poster of your level.
 
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Unemployment extension? You do realize someone has to pay for that and most times They cant afford it...
Try and keep up fester
 
Ooooooohhhh, look, Mumsie... a LibTard "cupcake", copy-catting Conservatives' use of the word... so few LibTards have even the tiniest sliver of originality.

Yeah... Dems tried to stop all that... NAFTA... TPP... that kind of effort by the Dems... trying to stop jobs from going off-shore, right? Ssuuuurrree !!! Not.

Maybe... one day... a long time from now... when you finally get to put on your Big Boy Pants... you'll figure out that Dems are just as full of $hit as Pubs...

It's just a different smell and a different flavor coming from a different angle...

Donkey $hit is, indeed, different from Elephant $hit...

But it's still $hit..

=======================================================

Meanwhile...

When the Pubs pull the plug on SNAP, or, at least, when they shave it down to within an inch of its life...

6.9% of the White population will be impacted...

28.29% of the Black population will be impacted...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/17419822/

Sounds like great fun...

Enjoy...


NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


CATO, THAT RIGHT WING GROUP DEFINED IT CUPCAKE

Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget
Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget

Poorly written with no definition. I'll use Ethanol as an example since you were incapable of defining a subsidy on your own. Trash it. It is a scam.

But let's back up a minute. What is your definition of a Federal subsidy?
 
NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester

All money bills are under the control of the Republican Congress.
 
NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester

Obama vowed to block R&D. The only area startups and small businesses can make a major move against the conglomerates Obama supported.
Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...


quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg
Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.

BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester
All money bills are under the control of the Republican Congress.
Yes there is an R next to the majority, but I understand. It will take a lot of work to overcome 57 years of Democrat failure in congress.
 
NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester



Sure Cupcake

DPCCPrivateSectorPayroll120216.png
 
Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...


quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg
Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.

BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester


Sure Cupcake

DPCCPrivateSectorPayroll120216.png
Try and keep up fester...
More rules and regulations disproportionately affect small business adversely, and actually helps large corporations see the Paris accords
 
Especially in the red states. Ooooh, that's positively orgasmic. How can they compete morally with the angelic beings dwelling in the heavenly blue states?
What's really weird is the fact that 1 in 5 get Welfare nationwide....so it has to be worse in Blue States like California. And a Red State like Texas has alot of illegals dragging down the numbers.

How do ILLEGALS draw SSDI?

Stolen SSNs?
 
INCOME TAXES AGAIN HUH CUPCAKE?

"The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 70% of all collected income taxes."

TOP 10% MADE 45.87% OF ALL US INCOME

Paid 69.80% of INCOME taxes (which are only 25% of ALL Gov't taxes)

MIN of $127,695 AGI, AND paid a 20.75% Avg Tax rate


A 2007 study by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez calculated effective tax rates for various income groups.

For people whose income ranked between the top 1 percent and top 0.5 percent, the effective tax rate for individual, corporate, payroll and estate was 34.0 percent in 1960, 36.1 percent in 1970, 37.6 percent in 1980, 31.5 percent in 1990, 35.7 percent in 2000 and 31.3 percent in 2004.

For those earning between the top 0.1 percent and 0.5 percent of the income curve, the numbers were 41.4 percent in 1960, 44.6 percent in 1970, 43.0 percent in 1980, 33.0 percent in 1990, 38.4 percent in 2000 and 33.0 percent in 2004.

For those earning between 0.01 percent and 0.1 percent, the rates were 55.3 percent in 1960, 59.1 percent in 1970, 51.0 percent in 1980, 34.3 percent in 1990, 40.2 percent in 2000 and 34.1 percent in 2004.

Finally, for those in the top 0.01 percent of the income distribution, the effective tax rate was 71.4 percent in 1960, 74.6 percent in 1970, 59.3 percent in 1980, 35.4 percent in 1990, 40.8 percent in 2000 and 34.7 percent in 2004.

Barack Obama says tax rates are lowest since 1950s for CEOs, hedge fund managers



The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston

Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston



Those who advocate for tax cuts for the highest earners and erroneously claim that the wealthy are overtaxed focus solely on the federal personal income tax, while ignoring all of the other taxes that Americans pay. As the table to the right illustrates, the total share of taxes (federal, state, and local) that will be paid by Americans across the economic spectrum in 2016 is roughly equal to their total share of income


whopayshares2016lq.jpg


whopaysrates2016lq.jpg



Who Pays Taxes in America in 2016? | CTJReports

Irrelevant. The point still stands.

We all (including the wealthy) pay those taxes. But payroll tax is money you will likely get back.

Social Security: you will get more than you pay into the program if you live the average lifespan.

Medicare: again, you will get more back than you pay into if you live the average lifespan.

FICA: A cute name for an additional SS tax; again, you will get that all back.

City taxes: You get that back through city services such as garbage collection, street lights, paved and maintained streets and roads, police and emergency services.

State taxes: again, paved roads, emergency services, new highways, maintained highways, state contributions to Medicaid, state workers pay and benefits......
This is true, and the problem with socialist entitlement programs less people are putting less into a programs, more people are taking more out of the same programs… That's a loser every time

More than that is the fact the wage earners who support those programs don't use most of them. The wealthy will never need any social safety net programs. They need the military no less than a poor person. They use the same roads and bridges as the poor and middle-class. They don't use education money because they likely send their children to private school or city schools that don't use federal money. They likely don't use veterans benefits such as the VA.

Right, the wealthy don't need a first class US H/C system, or defense department, or functioning court system, or educational system, etc *shaking head*



HINT THEY BENEFIT WHEN THEY HIRE PEOPLE WHO GET THOSE THINGS DUMBASS!


The perfect example of CONservative policy is a 3rd world nation where very few rich live behind walls, a very small middle class and a HUGE working poor population!

Kansas-Experiment.gif



e73b5f43ffb9cafc5764b36b433ddc23.jpg
Lol! Where did you get the ridiculous Kansas meme. Funny stuff. Completely wrong, but not unexpected from a poster of your level.

OCT 25, 2016
Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback’s trickle-down economics experiment is so bad the state stopped reporting on it
Gov. Brownback wanted to be held accountable. Now that his economic program is a disaster? Not so much
Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback’s trickle-down economics experiment is so bad the state stopped reporting on it


FEB 23, 2017
Kansas GOP revolts, nearly overturns Gov. Sam Brownback’s billion-dollar failed experiment

Republican-led state house votes overwhelmingly to roll back Brownback's 2012 tax cuts, but override falls short

Kansas GOP revolts, nearly overturns Gov. Sam Brownback’s billion-dollar failed experiment



MAY 1, 2017
Kansas: Exhibit A against trickle-down tax cuts

No credible analyst would claim that growth effects from tax cuts come anywhere close to offsetting their cost. There’s no consistent correlation between growth, productivity or investment and changes in tax rates over time or between countries. That’s not to say tax cuts never have any effect on growth (the effects, for the record, can go either way; a new, authoritative analysis of House Republicans’ latest trickle-down tax cut proposal finds, for instance, that its “estimated output effects appear to be limited in size and possibly negative”). But the historical evidence provides no basis for the kinds of claims we’re hearing from team Trump.

We don’t have to look only to history, though. There’s a real-time, trickle-down experiment ongoing in Kansas, one designed by the same folks behind the Trump plan.


In 2012, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback signed a bill that, among other things, substantially cut the state’s top tax rate and exempted “pass-through” business income from taxation (President Trump’s tax plan includes a similar loophole). The architects of Brownback’s plan predicted that it would provide an “immediate and lasting boost” to the state’s economy.

They were wrong. Real GDP growth in Kansas since the fourth quarter of 2012 (Brownback’s cuts took effect in January 2013) has been relatively slow, at 6.1 percent through the third quarter of 2016. That’s about three-fourths of U.S. GDP growth over that same period (8.3 percent). A similar story holds for private employment growth: 5.0 percent in Kansas between December 2012 and March 2017, 9.1 percent in the U.S. overall. Relative to its neighboring states, Kansas is no standout, either; on these indicators, it’s doing worse than Colorado, Missouri and Nebraska, though better than Oklahoma (another big tax cutter).

Kansas lost $472 million from the pass-through loophole in 2014 alone, and general fund revenue in 2016 was $570 million (0.4 percent of state GDP) below 2013 levels. Casualties of the reduced revenue have included the state’s transportation projects, some of which have been indefinitely postponed, and funding for K-12 and higher education. The state’s bond rating has been downgraded twice, in 2014 and in 2016.

As the table below summarizes (see here for more details), Kansas’s experience puts the lie of the tax cutters’ claims on full display.

WAPO

Perspective | Kansas: Exhibit A against trickle-down tax cuts
 
NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


CATO, THAT RIGHT WING GROUP DEFINED IT CUPCAKE

Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget
Corporate Welfare in the Federal Budget

Poorly written with no definition. I'll use Ethanol as an example since you were incapable of defining a subsidy on your own. Trash it. It is a scam.

But let's back up a minute. What is your definition of a Federal subsidy?


You saying right wing CATO is wrong Cupcake?
 
NAFTA? Oh right thew CONservative Heritage Foundations thing that Ronnie Reagan introduced to US the day he ran for Prez in 1979.

It was proposed by Ronnie, negotiated by HW, and pushed through with GOP SUPPORTERS by BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike.

60% of Dems have opposed EVERY free trade agreement Know how math works Cupcake? Want to guess the percentage of GOPers supporting them"


Ronald Reagan calls for an open border with Mexico, 1980


Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...



quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg

Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.


BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg

Unemployment extension? You do realize someone has to pay for that and most times They cant afford it...
Try and keep up fester


During the worst economic downturn since the first GOP great depression, the GOP held unemployment extensions hostage in Dec 2010 to stop Obama from getting rid of Dubya's "job creator" tax cuts on $200,000 AGI individual and $250,000 AGI for a couple Cupcake. This was after 7 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies where they gutted revenues trillions AS they blew up spending. Paid for?
 
Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.

BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester


Sure Cupcake

DPCCPrivateSectorPayroll120216.png
Try and keep up fester...
More rules and regulations disproportionately affect small business adversely, and actually helps large corporations see the Paris accords


More right wing OPINIONS not based in reality or history. Shocking Cupcake
 
Doesn't matter.

The subject-at-hand is SNAP, and related welfare programming, such as Medicaid...

With SNAP being the most ubiquitous form of such programming...

And Red State consumption of SNAP vs. Blue State consumption of SNAP.

For that, read... White Folk on SNAP vs. Black Folk on SNAP... as a macro-level observation.

On that level, as SNAP gets cut to the bare bone...

6.9% of White Folk will be impacted...

28.29% of Black Folk will be impacted...

Broadly speaking, I don't think White America really gives a good rat's ass about SNAP any longer...

They just wanna keep more money in their wallets...

Times changed, on November 8, 2016...

Fun time, and the Free Ride, are over...

You're on your own... as it should have been, all along...

Enjoy...


quote-when-i-give-food-to-the-poor-they-call-me-a-saint-when-i-ask-why-the-poor-have-no-food-helder-camara-34-94-10.jpg

4df63effd84b7b542d104a93d07bdfbe.jpg


2mectww.jpg
Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.

BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester
Obama vowed to block R&D. The only area startups and small businesses can make a major move against the conglomerates Obama supported.
Define corporate subsidies. Are you referring to legal tax credits, or do you believe the Feds are send big fat checks to every business owner? Obama had lots of time to work on legal tax credits and failed to do. Now he is cashing in with silly speeches for millions from big banks and others.

BTW, Obama proposed for 5+ years Corp tax reform, cutting the rate from 35% to 28% and take away deductions and use excess money to fund a $1 trillion infrastructure plan. THE GOP BLOCKED IT.


obstruction.jpg
Obama treated small business like shit… fact
Try and keep up fester
All money bills are under the control of the Republican Congress.
Yes there is an R next to the majority, but I understand. It will take a lot of work to overcome 57 years of Democrat failure in congress.


How Small Business Owners View the President's Economic Legacy
President Obama generally gets good marks for shepherding the economic recovery. But there is much more to be done.

How Small Business Owners View the President's Economic Legacy
 

Forum List

Back
Top