No, what Wildcard did was speculate a piece of the plane could not have come from flight #77 because in his estimation, the white trim on the lettering was too small.
That in no way, shape, or form, proves it did not come from flight #77. That you claim such silly eyeballing of the lettering equates to that piece of a plane "couldn't" have come from flight #77 only serves to undermine you credibility.
By the way... the width of the lettering matches perfectly.
Sigh -.-. You're confusing shape with size. You can photoshop a mountain to fit into someone's mouth and look like a tooth, it doesn't mean the mountain was that person's tooth. Now, I'm not an airplane mechanic, but one thing to consider- doesn't that piece of metal look awfully thin to belong to a 757? And why did it survive when the engines didn't?
Now take a look at this alleged piece of 757 debris:
Again, mighty small and thin pieces of debris, don't you think? Another thing, notice how even Terry Morin admits he thought the plane was a 737, not a 757 when he first saw it? A 737 is a somewhat smaller plane. Something to consider at any rate.
...
We're showing you evidence that was recovered. It's obviously your decision what you will or will not believe. Personally, when I see plane parts scattered at the scene of a purported plane crash and I see damage to a building somewhat resembling the shape of a plane and I see an image that appears to be said plane which also matches the description from many witnesses .... I believe the government's version over that of twoofers. And not because it's the government. I'm well aware that the government lies, misinforms, etc... but because their's is the only account consistent with logic and sound reasoning.
