Exactly. Punish abortion like it's jaywalking. Brilliant. But make her acknowledge that she is ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again.for jaywalking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly. Punish abortion like it's jaywalking. Brilliant. But make her acknowledge that she is ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again.for jaywalking
No it isn't. Communism is a type of autocracy, which is the opposite of democracy.Again... there's no democracy in America. We are a republic. A democracy is - logically - just a few steps away from communism.
No one is contesting that point.Because you are conflicted. Because it is wrong to end a human life.
But make her acknowledge that she is ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again.
So what if she is ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again? You said yourself she is involved in the unique circumstances whereas ending her pregnancy early involves ending a not viable and never viable human life similar to normal miscarriage. She is not killing a baby or committing a crime and when told that she had no reason to show remorse.unique circumstances
Agreed maybe he shouldn't and maybe she shouldn't. But it happens and both should have equality in any decision about their mixed dna being and what happens to it.Maybe he should only give his DNA to someone who wants to have his baby.
That would be ideal but in the real world it can only be her single the burden falls only on her. At least until birth.Agreed maybe he shouldn't and maybe she shouldn't. But it happens and both should have equality in any decision about their mixed dna being and what happens to it.
Who Owns the Frozen Embryos?
So, bigots.No one is contesting that point.
But there are people who believe that Constitutional rights do not yet extend to a zygote, embryo, or fetus, for moral or religious reasons.
No. The government has to be equal and fair and not endorse their moronic, hateful prejudice and discriminate against innocents to the point of turning a blind eye to their homicide.You may think that those people are bonkers or ignorant or outright evil, which is your right, but the government has to recognize their belief every bit as much as it recognizes yours.
I don't agree with that. I think both are to blame if they end a life period. Men have a response obligation and they are accountable equally.That would be ideal but in the real world it can only be her single the burden falls only on her. At least until birth.
The Constitution.So, bigots.
Who cares what hateful trash bigots think?
You think they're hateful and prejudiced. They think you're hateful and prejudiced. The goal is to provide an answer that allows both people the freedom to follow their own morality.No. The government has to be equal and fair and not endorse their moronic, hateful prejudice and discriminate against innocents to the point of turning a blind eye to their homicide.
When someone kills a mother and her unborn child, why are they often charged with 2 murders/homicides?And the "hom-" in homicide means "person." The government can't slap a homicide label on it if only some of the people believe that the target was legally a person.
unique circumstances
Why does it stop being a private matter a for woman and whomever she chooses to share it at 20 weeks?Saint Ding says in post #11,521 that ending a human life through abortion is wrong. That is a personal opinion and should be taken as such and no further because ending an abortion within the first 20 weeks decided for convenience by the woman involved is a private matter for her and with whomever she chooses to share it.
So if a woman becomes pregnant and does not want to be, if she chooses to avoid the risk of delivering a new unique human being to the world by having an abortion; who is Saint Ding to say it is wrong and that she has to answer to him by being publicly shamed for acting in self defense.
If you're not going to even pretend to talk about reality, why should anyone bother speaking with you?Paying to kill black babies is the outcome of their policy.
Most pro-lifers hate democracy. Authoritarians are like that. They don't want individuals to have liberty. People like Ding get off on forcing others to obey.Yes, but it is not a democracy. Democracy is mob rule.
Your religious brainwashing has transformed you into a delusional fascist.
More like go fuck yourself if you believe either myself , or my expectations for any other , is to answer to yearn self officiated social justice for a neophyte foundation of political science .What was your point? That you can't accept abortion being a misdemeanor?
Because that's how Florida chooses to do it. Florida, though, is one of fifty, and at the federal level, the other 49 have to be taken into account as well.When someone kills a mother and her unborn child, why are they often charged with 2 murders/homicides?
Example, FL law:
782.09 Killing of unborn child by injury to mother.—
(1) The unlawful killing of an unborn child, by any injury to the mother of such child which would be murder if it resulted in the death of such mother, shall be deemed murder in the same degree as that which would have been committed against the mother. Any person, other than the mother, who unlawfully kills an unborn child by any injury to the mother:
The gawd of a hue mammon ape is its composite of physical characteristics , which are by simile , its garments from nature ,Says a fool who denies God.
One who denies God is in no position to judge anyone else's, intelligence or mental soundness.
According to you:Because that's how Florida chooses to do it. Florida, though, is one of fifty, and at the federal level, the other 49 have to be taken into account as well.