A Touchy Question On Gendercide Or In This Case Homocide

You're the one bringing that up.

So what is your motivation? Why are you a man so committed to promoting abortion?

Crushing the Religious Right.

That's my goal.

I don't give a fuck about abortions one way or the other, but as long as the Church Nutbags are against it, I want it to be legal. I want them to gnash their teeth at the thought they ain't the boss of me.

And as a practical matter, abortion laws don't work. Which I've pointed out many times, but I guess you'll pretend they do.

Abortion is illegal in the Philippines, but 500,000 very religious Filipinas manage to get illegal abortions every year. People are going to do what they are going to do.
 
Yes you point out the same sad crap ad nauseum. Of course there's no evidence to support your idiocy.

The religious right is also anti-rape, anti-theft, anti-murder (of adults). So do you take a stand for those things, too?

At least we know now what your motivation is.
 
Yes you point out the same sad crap ad nauseum. Of course there's no evidence to support your idiocy.

The religious right is also anti-rape, anti-theft, anti-murder (of adults). So do you take a stand for those things, too?

At least we know now what your motivation is.

Laws against Rape and Murder are enforceable. You have complaining witnesses, and people willing to convict them.

You'd never get that with abortion laws, because you'd never get a jury willing to convict, prosecutors willing to face the wrath of voters by charging a woman for having one, or cops who will make an arrest.

You want to make the comparison to rape, but real comparison is to prostitution laws.

No one is thrilled that they are doing it, but you can't stop them, and it's not like you'd get an effective enforcement of the laws.

If we can't effectively outlaw prostitution, which a majority really thinks is a bad idea, how can we really get an effective ban on abortion, which most people think should be legal in at least SOME circumstances?
 
We have effectively outlawed prostitution, just as we've effectively outlawed murder. Sure it still happens, humans are like that.

Prostitution is also not a victimless crime..but I think we have effectively established you don't give a shit if women and children are the victims.

Typical depraved pro-abortion, pro-prostitution pervert. Carry on. I'm sure you have some victimless child porn to check out.
 
We have effectively outlawed prostitution, just as we've effectively outlawed murder. Sure it still happens, humans are like that.

Prostitution is also not a victimless crime..but I think we have effectively established you don't give a shit if women and children are the victims.

Typical depraved pro-abortion, pro-prostitution pervert. Carry on. I'm sure you have some victimless child porn to check out.

I'm not into that sort of stuff, but it's funny that's the first place your mind goes...

Prostution only has victims because of its illegality. In places where it's legal, it's just like any other job.

Of course, you can make a comparison between prostution and any other kind of job. The better you perform, the more they screw you! :badgrin:

But the fact is, there's a massage parlor not a mile from my house. I used to live in a town that was notorious in IL for it's strip clubs. So the notion that the "outlawing" of prosittution has been effective is laughable.

A law that isn't enforced and people have contempt for isn't "effective".

And thus why abortion laws failed in the past and would fail again. When so many people have contempt for a law, it's an ineffective law.
 
Prostution only has victims because of its illegality. In places where it's legal, it's just like any other job. .


You prove yet again that you are an immoral, ignorant, low-life piece of shit.
 
They always expose themselves in the end. They can't help it.

Yawn... Yup, phony morality always bores me.

Fact is, when teh GOP convention rolls into town, prostitution is up. Every Time.

But to the point, why is it illegal to take money to do something that isn't a crime if you do it for free?

The logic there has always confused me a bit.
 
Prostution only has victims because of its illegality. In places where it's legal, it's just like any other job. .


You prove yet again that you are an immoral, ignorant, low-life piece of shit.

Guy, if you ever had sex, it was because money changed hands.

Why is it illegal if money changes hands and not illegal if it doesn't.

That actually sounds kind of crazy, which is why prostitution laws are rarely enforced.
 
Prostution only has victims because of its illegality. In places where it's legal, it's just like any other job. .


You prove yet again that you are an immoral, ignorant, low-life piece of shit.

Guy, if you ever had sex, it was because money changed hands.


Do you have any idea how stupid you make yourself look with this nonsense? Almost as stupid as when you are afraid to answer simple questions.
 
Why is it illegal if money changes hands and not illegal if it doesn't.



You really are remarkably stupid. If someone donates an organ, that's not illegal. Selling human organs is illegal. Can your pea brain figure out why?

The fact that you are so dishonest, cowardly, morally bankrupt, and mentally limited means you are unlikely to ever understand anything being explained to you here.
 
They always expose themselves in the end. They can't help it.

Yawn... Yup, phony morality always bores me.

Fact is, when teh GOP convention rolls into town, prostitution is up. Every Time.

But to the point, why is it illegal to take money to do something that isn't a crime if you do it for free?

The logic there has always confused me a bit.

That's because your train of thought isn't logical. You use logical fallacy and think you've made points. You haven't, you've just exposed yourself.
 
So here's the gist of it...

Joe is pro-abortion, pro-prostitution, and thinks it's nobody's business if women and children are victimized.

Because he's pro-abortion, and pro-prostitution.

Lovely. this is what I keep saying about men who go to bat for abortion. They ALWAYS have a motive, and it always involves their own degenerate lifestyle, which always involves coercing/demeaning women and/or children. Without exception.
 
Last edited:
You really are remarkably stupid. If someone donates an organ, that's not illegal. Selling human organs is illegal. Can your pea brain figure out why?

The fact that you are so dishonest, cowardly, morally bankrupt, and mentally limited means you are unlikely to ever understand anything being explained to you here.

Again, why is that?

Why not let a poor person sell his kidney? Why not let a family get compensation for their dead relative's organs? We'd get more organ donations that way and save lives.

Lining up false equivlencies to bolster weak arguments just points out the weakness of your argument.

We let people donate AND sell blood. Is selling blood immoral? then why is selling sex? You see the problem, you create false moralities, without being able to defend them other than saying "God says it's bad".
 
So here's the gist of it...

Joe is pro-abortion, pro-prostitution, and thinks it's nobody's business if women and children are victimized.

Because he's pro-abortion, and pro-prostitution.

Lovely. this is what I keep saying about men who go to bat for abortion. They ALWAYS have a motive, and it always involves their own degenerate lifestyle, which always involves coercing/demeaning women and/or children. Without exception.

If your argument is so strong, why do you need to keep bringing in false equivlencies?

I'm not pro-abortion or prostitution. I'm anti- stupid laws that don't work and do more harm than good. A concept you just don't seem to understand.

Prostitution laws don't work. Neither did abortion laws.
 
They always expose themselves in the end. They can't help it.

Yawn... Yup, phony morality always bores me.

Fact is, when teh GOP convention rolls into town, prostitution is up. Every Time.

But to the point, why is it illegal to take money to do something that isn't a crime if you do it for free?

The logic there has always confused me a bit.

That's because your train of thought isn't logical. You use logical fallacy and think you've made points. You haven't, you've just exposed yourself.

The only logical fallacy I see here is yours. You keep bringing in false equivlencies to bolster a weak case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top