All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[rylah]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

There is no foreign cage. If a cage exists, it is a cage of their own making.

How hard are the Palestinians allowed to rattle their cage?

(COMMENT)

The denial to allow the entry of the Arab Palestinians into the Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt was a decision made by the Lebanese Republic (AKA Lebanon) Government, the Government of the United Arab Republic (AKA Egypt) and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (AKA Jordan). And these decisions, although similar to the decision made by the State of Israel, were not the exact same nor coordinated with each other to entrap and encapsulate the Arab Palestinians.

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians. Israel is only one of several nations that deny entry to Arab Palestinians. If there is a cage to rattle → The State of Israel is only one bar of the cage.

Most Respectfully,
R

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however do have the right to return to their homeland.

Arafat's rotten bones can be returned to Egypt anytime.
However I think camels would object...

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

There is no foreign cage. If a cage exists, it is a cage of their own making.

How hard are the Palestinians allowed to rattle their cage?

(COMMENT)

The denial to allow the entry of the Arab Palestinians into the Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt was a decision made by the Lebanese Republic (AKA Lebanon) Government, the Government of the United Arab Republic (AKA Egypt) and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (AKA Jordan). And these decisions, although similar to the decision made by the State of Israel, were not the exact same nor coordinated with each other to entrap and encapsulate the Arab Palestinians.

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians. Israel is only one of several nations that deny entry to Arab Palestinians. If there is a cage to rattle → The State of Israel is only one bar of the cage.

Most Respectfully,
R

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however do have the right to return to their homeland.

Their homelands of Syria, Lebanon and Egypt don’t want them back.

Stupid post of the day!

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

There is no foreign cage. If a cage exists, it is a cage of their own making.

How hard are the Palestinians allowed to rattle their cage?

(COMMENT)

The denial to allow the entry of the Arab Palestinians into the Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt was a decision made by the Lebanese Republic (AKA Lebanon) Government, the Government of the United Arab Republic (AKA Egypt) and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (AKA Jordan). And these decisions, although similar to the decision made by the State of Israel, were not the exact same nor coordinated with each other to entrap and encapsulate the Arab Palestinians.

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians. Israel is only one of several nations that deny entry to Arab Palestinians. If there is a cage to rattle → The State of Israel is only one bar of the cage.

Most Respectfully,
R

What the denial of entry decisions have in common → that they were made in the best interest of each country. There is no international requirement that any country must act in contravention to there own best interest on matter pertaining to Arab Palestinians.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however do have the right to return to their homeland.

Their homelands of Syria, Lebanon and Egypt don’t want them back.

Stupid post of the day!

Deflection.

 

[Shusha]

Islamic terrorists make poor choices for civil government.

Wow. Never saw that one comin’.

Pot - Kettle!

Comparing what Hamas has done and said with what you imagine Israel to do in the future.
Not equivalent.

 

[Shusha]

Jerusalem Day: Arabs destroy their Mosque after seeing Jews on the Temple Mount

For the whole day the degenerates have played aims at Jews praying down the Mountain,
throwing stones and whatever comes to hand from the top. It just happens that to do this they literally break the building that causes all the trouble...

Irony much?

This is insane. How does one address such a people?

They aren’t “protesting” to gain human rights. They are protesting to exclude people from having human rights.

How do we (Israel, the world) deal with a people who rejects human rights for people based on their ethnic or religious identity?

 

[rylah]

Jerusalem Day: Arabs destroy their Mosque after seeing Jews on the Temple Mount

For the whole day the degenerates have played aims at Jews praying down the Mountain,
throwing stones and whatever comes to hand from the top. It just happens that to do this they literally break the building that causes all the trouble...

Irony much?

This is insane. How does one address such a people?

They aren’t “protesting” to gain human rights. They are protesting to exclude people from having human rights.

How do we (Israel, the world) deal with a people who rejects human rights for people based on their ethnic or religious identity?

Drop diplomacy, talk Jewish.
There was no diplomacy between Rabbi Mordechai Elyahu ZTZVK"L
and the Arab guards at the Cave of the Patriarchs...only among the high officers.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Jerusalem Day: Arabs destroy their Mosque after seeing Jews on the Temple Mount

For the whole day the degenerates have played aims at Jews praying down the Mountain,
throwing stones and whatever comes to hand from the top. It just happens that to do this they literally break the building that causes all the trouble...

Irony much?

This is insane. How does one address such a people?

They aren’t “protesting” to gain human rights. They are protesting to exclude people from having human rights.

How do we (Israel, the world) deal with a people who rejects human rights for people based on their ethnic or religious identity?

Drop diplomacy, talk Jewish.
There was no diplomacy between Rabbi Mordechai Elyahu ZTZVK"L
and the Arab guards at the Cave of the Patriarchs...only among the high officers.

What happened between Rabbi Mordechai Elyahu and the Arab guards at the Tomb of the Patriarchs? Story please.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty. There are a few Arab Palestinians (age 70 years or better) that were residents in the territory prior to 15 May 1948.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however, do have the right to return to their homeland.

(COMMENT)

This is another case of the Arab Palestinians crying about the outcome of the 1948-49 War of Independence.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

What are you saying?

Their homelands of Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt don’t want them back.

Stupid post of the day!

(COMMENT)

Are you saying that Lebanon accepts more Palestinians?
Are you saying Egypt has opened its doors to the Palestinians?
Are you saying that Jordan really did want to sever all ties with the West Bank?

• List of 13 Countries Smart Enough to Refuse Muslim Refugees •
Posted by Bernie on January 28, 2016 11:03 AM | 18 Comments

I guess I just don't know why the observation is "stupid."

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[sealybobo]

Jews in Israel don’t care about Africans seeking asylum. America doesn’t care about South American asylum seekers.

Other than Israel is an ally I don’t care how they run their country.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty. There are a few Arab Palestinians (age 70 years or better) that were residents in the territory prior to 15 May 1948.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however, do have the right to return to their homeland.

(COMMENT)

This is another case of the Arab Palestinians crying about the outcome of the 1948-49 War of Independence.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty.

Not true. Habitual residents become citizens of successor states.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty. There are a few Arab Palestinians (age 70 years or better) that were residents in the territory prior to 15 May 1948.

The Palestinians are foreign national to the surrounding countries. They do not have to accept Palestinians. The Palestinians, however, do have the right to return to their homeland.

(COMMENT)

This is another case of the Arab Palestinians crying about the outcome of the 1948-49 War of Independence.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty.

Not true. Habitual residents become citizens of successor states.

Indeed, another fraud you perpetrate again and again knowing it’s a fraud.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You are such "The Kidder."

Israel was not the "successor state" in the sense of that meaning. Israel was a "new state" established by self-determination. Israel has the autonomy to determine the domestic laws under which citizenship is granted.

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty.

Not true. Habitual residents become citizens of successor states.

(COMMENT)

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

Successful states generally accept applications from potential citizens that show some sort of promise for the future. That is anything by the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. There is a world of difference between the success demonstrated by the Jewish People that built Israel and the lack of success demonstrated by the Arab Palestinians that rejected the invitation to participate in the establishment of self-governing institutions and the Steps Preparatory to Independence.

Crying about the establishment of Israel and the adverse consequences that the Arab Palestinians brought upon themselves, in attempting to suppress Jewish self-determination.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You are such "The Kidder."

Israel was not the "successor state" in the sense of that meaning. Israel was a "new state" established by self-determination. Israel has the autonomy to determine the domestic laws under which citizenship is granted.

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty.

Not true. Habitual residents become citizens of successor states.

(COMMENT)

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

Successful states generally accept applications from potential citizens that show some sort of promise for the future. That is anything by the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. There is a world of difference between the success demonstrated by the Jewish People that built Israel and the lack of success demonstrated by the Arab Palestinians that rejected the invitation to participate in the establishment of self-governing institutions and the Steps Preparatory to Independence.

Crying about the establishment of Israel and the adverse consequences that the Arab Palestinians brought upon themselves, in attempting to suppress Jewish self-determination.

Most Respectfully,
R

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

So? Citizenship is hereditary even if born out of the country. Ted Cruz and John McCain, for example.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You are such "The Kidder."

Israel was not the "successor state" in the sense of that meaning. Israel was a "new state" established by self-determination. Israel has the autonomy to determine the domestic laws under which citizenship is granted.

The Arab Palestinians of the Gaza Strip are "foreign nationals" with respect to Israeli Sovereignty.

Not true. Habitual residents become citizens of successor states.

(COMMENT)

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

Successful states generally accept applications from potential citizens that show some sort of promise for the future. That is anything by the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. There is a world of difference between the success demonstrated by the Jewish People that built Israel and the lack of success demonstrated by the Arab Palestinians that rejected the invitation to participate in the establishment of self-governing institutions and the Steps Preparatory to Independence.

Crying about the establishment of Israel and the adverse consequences that the Arab Palestinians brought upon themselves, in attempting to suppress Jewish self-determination.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel was not the "successor state" in the sense of that meaning. Israel was a "new state" established by self-determination.

So? All the Palestinian citizens who lived in the territory that became Israel are to be Israeli citizens.

Look it up.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH! For heavens sake.

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

So? Citizenship is hereditary even if born out of the country. Ted Cruz and John McCain, for example.

(COMMENT)

Citizenship is a "Domestic Law." No International Law can set the criteria for citizenship of any sovereign nation.

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another.

No matter WHAT code that you cite as giving the Arab Palestinian some privilege with Israel, it cannot hold any authority over another country (including Israel; unless Israel approves).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH! For heavens sake.

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

So? Citizenship is hereditary even if born out of the country. Ted Cruz and John McCain, for example.

(COMMENT)

Citizenship is a "Domestic Law." No International Law can set the criteria for citizenship of any sovereign nation.

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another.

No matter WHAT code that you cite as giving the Arab Palestinian some privilege with Israel, it cannot hold any authority over another country (including Israel; unless Israel approves).

Most Respectfully,
R

It is the obligation of one state to another.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH! For heavens sake.

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

So? Citizenship is hereditary even if born out of the country. Ted Cruz and John McCain, for example.

(COMMENT)

Citizenship is a "Domestic Law." No International Law can set the criteria for citizenship of any sovereign nation.

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another.

No matter WHAT code that you cite as giving the Arab Palestinian some privilege with Israel, it cannot hold any authority over another country (including Israel; unless Israel approves).

Most Respectfully,
R

It is the obligation of one state to another.

That's just silly.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH! For heavens sake.

Again, all the Arab "Habitual Residents" claiming the "right of some measure" are at least 70 years old. As I look at most confrontations photo's, I don't see many in that age group.

So? Citizenship is hereditary even if born out of the country. Ted Cruz and John McCain, for example.

(COMMENT)

Citizenship is a "Domestic Law." No International Law can set the criteria for citizenship of any sovereign nation.

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another.

No matter WHAT code that you cite as giving the Arab Palestinian some privilege with Israel, it cannot hold any authority over another country (including Israel; unless Israel approves).

Most Respectfully,
R

It is the obligation of one state to another.

That's just silly.

Not really. One state is obliged not to push its unwanted people onto another state.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss​

⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, I think that is a generally accepted description.

So? All the Palestinian citizens who lived in the territory that became Israel are to be Israeli citizens.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

So, if you were an infant in 1948 and living in Israeli sovereign territory, how old would you be today? (ANS: 70 years old.) These are the only people that have a cause of action.

What percent of the population would that be?

In the Gaza Strip (Population ≈ 1,836,713)

Age structure: 65 years of age and over: 2.58% (male 24,863 /female 22,607) (2018 est.)​

Life expectancy at birth:

Total population: 74.4 years
Male: 72.7 years
Female: 76.2 years (2018 est.)​

In 2021, there will be no Arab Palestinian males that will not be beyond their life expectancy; if there are any at all. (1948 + 73 years)
In 2024, there will be no Arab Palestinian females that will not be beyond their life expectancy; if there are any at all. (1948 + 76 years)​

A similar set of calculation can be done for the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (Population ≈ 2,798,494).

Age Structure: 65 years and over: 3.52% (male 44,662 /female 53,943) (2018 est.)
Life expectancy at birth:

Total population: 75.4 years
Male: 73.4 years
Female: 77.6 years (2018 est.)​

In 2022, there will be no Arab Palestinian males that will not be beyond their life expectancy; if there are any at all. (1948 + 74 years)
In 2026, there will be no Arab Palestinian females that will not be beyond their life expectancy; if there are any at all. (1948 + 78 years)​

SO! In less than a decade, there will probably be no Arab Palestinian that could have once lived and had a legitimate claim (not that it is valid now) to the "right to return" to destinations within the sovereignty of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R