Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i did not say thatGotcha. So we need to make homosexuality illegal again, because of the pedopiles? Is that what you are saying here?
Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
Why did you bring up pedophilia at all? I still don’t get it.i did not say thatGotcha. So we need to make homosexuality illegal again, because of the pedopiles? Is that what you are saying here?
what I’m pointing out to you is that merely telling us that pedophilia is against the law does not mean a thing because 5 damn fools on the SC can change the law whenever they please
whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate and what is fascist is to point the government gun at their head and say yes you will,,,Dude, that’s even worse. It’s not fascist to deny service to an entire category of people based solely on their identity but it is fascist to deny selling a book by one person of a group because they don’t agree with the product.not true,, the baker has never ever once sold that product and amazon has always sold conservative books,,
See, one is discriminating on identity and the other is discriminating based on activity.
If the gay couple came into the bakery and called everyone behind the country names, I’d have no problem with them denying them service.
and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
He’s baked wedding cakes before.and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
the issue is the dbl standard,, they are free to decide what they will or wont sell,,Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
And even then only if affects people you agree with.
not for gay weddings,,,He’s baked wedding cakes before.and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Except you OP said that Amazon is fascist for deciding and then later said it’s not fascist.the issue is the dbl standard,, they are free to decide what they will or wont sell,,Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
And even then only if affects people you agree with.
lets not forget that both the 1st A and free speech is for speech you dont like not what you do like,,
I didnt write the article,,Except you OP said that Amazon is fascist for deciding and then later said it’s not fascist.the issue is the dbl standard,, they are free to decide what they will or wont sell,,Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
And even then only if affects people you agree with.
lets not forget that both the 1st A and free speech is for speech you dont like not what you do like,,
Which is it? You’re going both ways here.
If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.not for gay weddings,,,He’s baked wedding cakes before.and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??
are you ever going to answer that??
You wrote the OP.I didnt write the article,,Except you OP said that Amazon is fascist for deciding and then later said it’s not fascist.the issue is the dbl standard,, they are free to decide what they will or wont sell,,Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
And even then only if affects people you agree with.
lets not forget that both the 1st A and free speech is for speech you dont like not what you do like,,
Which is it? You’re going both ways here.
if they just went elsewhere instead of using the government gun it wouldnt be an issue,,If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.not for gay weddings,,,He’s baked wedding cakes before.and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??
are you ever going to answer that??
‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…therightscoop.com
but I didnt write the article,,,You wrote the OP.I didnt write the article,,Except you OP said that Amazon is fascist for deciding and then later said it’s not fascist.the issue is the dbl standard,, they are free to decide what they will or wont sell,,Unless you’re Amazon of course. Of Facebook, or YouTube or Twitter.whats not fascist is to say I dont want to participate
And even then only if affects people you agree with.
lets not forget that both the 1st A and free speech is for speech you dont like not what you do like,,
Which is it? You’re going both ways here.
as I've said many times,, its the dbl standard not them choosing to not sell,,‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…
It's OK really..... the real problem is not Amazon....they can do as they please.... the real problem is the liberal legislature who will arrest Amazon's competitors for doing the same.
That's where the problem is.
JO
if they just went elsewhere instead of using the government gun it wouldnt be an issue,,If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.not for gay weddings,,,He’s baked wedding cakes before.and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.thats not what he said,,,We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,
What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.
the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,
are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??
His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?
you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??
are you ever going to answer that??
but NOOOOO they demanded from others what they didnt want to do and used the government gun to do it,,,
which one do you think is the aggressor??
Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
