Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

 

[Penelope]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

It's OK really..... the real problem is not Amazon....they can do as they please.... the real problem is the liberal legislature who will arrest Amazon's competitors for doing the same.
That's where the problem is.

JO

as I've said many times,, its the dbl standard not them choosing to not sell,,

As is right for the cons, its right for the libs.

 

[Mac-7]

Why did you bring up pedophilia at all? I still don’t get it.

Because of your claim that all minorities are automatically above reproach

some minorities should be 2nd class citizens

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

It's OK really..... the real problem is not Amazon....they can do as they please.... the real problem is the liberal legislature who will arrest Amazon's competitors for doing the same.
That's where the problem is.

JO

as I've said many times,, its the dbl standard not them choosing to not sell,,

As is right for the cons, its right for the libs.

but its not right for the cons as the libs have made clear,,

 

[Penelope]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

 

[Penelope]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

It's OK really..... the real problem is not Amazon....they can do as they please.... the real problem is the liberal legislature who will arrest Amazon's competitors for doing the same.
That's where the problem is.

JO

as I've said many times,, its the dbl standard not them choosing to not sell,,

As is right for the cons, its right for the libs.

but its not right for the cons as the libs have made clear,,

You cons sites can have all the sponsors you like, I'm sure that some are book sellers, you can probably buy the book there.

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Because of your claim that all minorities are automatically above reproach

some minorities should be 2nd class citizens

Jesus, what a waste of time.

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

It's OK really..... the real problem is not Amazon....they can do as they please.... the real problem is the liberal legislature who will arrest Amazon's competitors for doing the same.
That's where the problem is.

JO

as I've said many times,, its the dbl standard not them choosing to not sell,,

As is right for the cons, its right for the libs.

but its not right for the cons as the libs have made clear,,

You cons sites can have all the sponsors you like, I'm sure that some are book sellers, you can probably buy the book there.

its about more than just book stores and social networks,,

 

[colfax_m]

but I didnt write the article,,,

I’m not talking about the article, I’m talking about the OP.

 

[progressive hunter]

but I didnt write the article,,,

I’m not talking about the article, I’m talking about the OP.

all I said is which group is always accusing the other of being a fascist,,,

and we all know one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,

 

[colfax_m]

its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,

We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.

What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.

thats not what he said,,,

the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,

are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??

Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.

His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?

and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,

He’s baked wedding cakes before.

not for gay weddings,,,

you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??

are you ever going to answer that??

If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.

if they just went elsewhere instead of using the government gun it wouldnt be an issue,,
but NOOOOO they demanded from others what they didnt want to do and used the government gun to do it,,,

which one do you think is the aggressor??

And so the baker is trying to purge them from existence with his censorship?

 

[progressive hunter]

its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,

We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.

What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.

thats not what he said,,,

the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,

are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??

Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.

His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?

and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,

He’s baked wedding cakes before.

not for gay weddings,,,

you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??

are you ever going to answer that??

If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.

if they just went elsewhere instead of using the government gun it wouldnt be an issue,,
but NOOOOO they demanded from others what they didnt want to do and used the government gun to do it,,,

which one do you think is the aggressor??

I wish it weren’t necessary, but minorities being treated like second class citizens almost tore the country apart. We tried it your way, it was a disaster.

whos treating them like 2nd class??

he just didnt want to participate in their wedding,, thats called choice and doesnt effect them at all

 

[colfax_m]

and we all know one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,

So clearly you were calling Amazon fascist by your line.

So you think the baker was taking the first step to fascism?

 

[progressive hunter]

its not my place to explain why someone else doesnt want to do something,,

We know exactly why he doesn’t want to do it, because he doesn’t think gay people should have the right to marry.

What I’m asking you is whether a cake for a gay couple is any different than a cake for a straight couple. You don’t want to answer because you can’t come up with an answer that doesn’t make you sound idiotic.

thats not what he said,,,

the difference is the religious belief,, and in this country we have a right to those beliefs,,

are you going to explain why you want to use the government gun to force others to do things they dont want to do??

Sure it is. He said he doesn’t bake cakes for gay people because the Bible says that gay people shouldn’t get married.

His religious beliefs don’t change the product. If I showed him two cakes, one baked for a gay wedding and one for a straight wedding, could he tell them apart?

and your solution is to have the government point a gun at his head and force him against his will to do something hes never done before,,

He’s baked wedding cakes before.

not for gay weddings,,,

you havent explained how not wanting to participate is bad but pointing the government gun at their head to force them is a good thing??

are you ever going to answer that??

If the baker hadn’t baked wedding cakes, the couple would have no case against him.

if they just went elsewhere instead of using the government gun it wouldnt be an issue,,
but NOOOOO they demanded from others what they didnt want to do and used the government gun to do it,,,

which one do you think is the aggressor??

And so the baker is trying to purge them from existence with his censorship?

I dont see how thats the case,, they are free to go elsewhere for their cake,,

now if he pointed a gun at their head I could see your point, but the gun was pointed at the baker not them,,

 

[colfax_m]

whos treating them like 2nd class??

The baker. He’d bake a cake for a straight couple but would refuse to bake the exact same cake for them.

Second class.

 

[progressive hunter]

and we all know one of the first steps to fascism is to stifle opposing views,,

So clearly you were calling Amazon fascist by your line.

So you think the baker was taking the first step to fascism?

you believe what you want,, in this case youre wrong,,

one person out of millions cant do that,, but if they used the government to force their belief like the cpl did then yeah thats a step towards fascism,,

 

[progressive hunter]

whos treating them like 2nd class??

The baker. He’d bake a cake for a straight couple but would refuse to bake the exact same cake for them.

Second class.

thats his right to not participate,,,

but again youre response is to point the government gun at his head and force him,,

which of those two is the fascist act??

 

[Mac-7]

what a waste of time.

If you are demanding that sexual perverts be accepted as normal people this is a waste of everone’s time

 

[bendog]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I'm pretty sure Amazon must comply with equal rights laws.