Meathead
Diamond Member
It certainly can be:When you have better weapons and carry diseases that inflict genocide on other populations its like being proud of having rabies. I get it though. Youre too weak mentally and physical so what else can you?----------------------------------------- yep , Whites did pretty good for themselves eh . From what I understand Whites are the smallest minority of minorities in the World . And English being even tinier the Sun never set on the British or White Empire Ace ,"The question isn't that Africans did nothing before the White man came along!"I don't see what the problem is here. The question isn't that Africans did nothing before the White man came along! It is just that they hadn't done anything yet of any real lasting consequence, for themselves or the outside world, and then, it was mainly only a few natural resources they had no hand in developing, and slavery, which they were masters at!
Actually that is the question for the world at large. Whites pushed this narrative in order to give themselves a sense of superiority. Not only did they push this narrative, they tried their best to convince the colonized and transplanted Africans of this silliness as well. The problem is the damage that has been done and the knowledge that may be forever lost. Its certainly an interesting study on the weakness of the white race that they suffer so badly from a crippling inferiority complex they had to come up with this lie to make themselves feel better.![]()
Pizzaz's problem is that he starts from the premise that brute force is somehow a "good" thing.
It isn't.
The "Powell Doctrine" is a journalist-created term, named after General Colin Powell in the run-up to the 1990–91 Gulf War. It is based in large part on the Weinberger Doctrine, devised by Caspar Weinberger, former Secretary of Defense and Powell's former boss. The doctrine emphasizes U.S. national security interests, overwhelming strike capabilities with an emphasis on ground forces, and widespread public support.[1]