🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Appropriate or inappropriate

Are the Hillary Clinton buttons appropriate

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 48.1%
  • No

    Votes: 10 37.0%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 7.4%

  • Total voters
    27
I asked you what she has DONE that would qualify her as "brilliant". I guess you can't produce anything.

The fact that you and I and the rest of the country know her name is evidence of her "brilliance".

Wouldn't that have been Bill's brilliance? :poke:

Both of them are brilliant.

Bill is more brilliant, at least in my opinion. But she took herself a lot farther than any other First Lady ever has.
 
The fact that you and I and the rest of the country know her name is evidence of her "brilliance".

Wouldn't that have been Bill's brilliance? :poke:

Both of them are brilliant.

Bill is more brilliant, at least in my opinion. But she took herself a lot farther than any other First Lady ever has.

Well, according to the link, no. They're pretty evenly matched with him at 137 and her at 140.
 
140 IQ falls within the brilliant range.



I think that's a bit .... dunno. Don't know where they got those parameters, since I've always heard "above average" about mine before, not "Gifted."

Is this that dumbing down of America thing?
I asked you what she has DONE that would qualify her as "brilliant". I guess you can't produce anything.

I guess anything that could be produced wouldn't be good enough. I'm sure you already know what her accomplishments are, and you don't see her as anything special.


:eusa_hand:
So, you have nothing?
 
No, because they're highly sexist. Otherwise, my idea is that they further cheapen the breasts and vagina. There aren't that many digs against tits or poon of that caliber. Why add another one?
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is absolutely appropriate. This is nothing compared to how people with left-wing political views made fun of and attacked Sarah Palin's grandchild with Down's Syndrome.

You know, I have one question. Is there anyone in the Democrat party running for president that's not an ancient 1960's radical extremist? Seriously, outside of Wendy Davis who is running for governor of Texas, the Democrats have no young and upcoming superstars, nothing but a bunch of old 60's radicals who are a step away from retirement homes.

Cory Booker

Julian Castro

Martin O'Malley

Amy Klobuchar

Elizabeth Warner

Off the top of my head.

And yours?
 
Wouldn't that have been Bill's brilliance? :poke:

Both of them are brilliant.

Bill is more brilliant, at least in my opinion. But she took herself a lot farther than any other First Lady ever has.

Well, according to the link, no. They're pretty evenly matched with him at 137 and her at 140.

IQ scores don't actually mean that much.

I have a higher IQ than either of them, but I'm nowhere near their level of political intelligence.
 
Tasteless, but I'm not sure what "appropriate" means in this context.

"Suitable or proper in the circumstances."

She's running for office (in all likelihood). She is a brilliant woman. But they're going to make this about her physical attributes, thereby reducing her to a caricature.

I used appropriate/inappropriate to avoid something along the lines of "Stay classy, GOP! Way to win women!"

You mean as the Democrats have "stayed classy" when it comes to Sarah Palin?
 
Tasteless, but I'm not sure what "appropriate" means in this context.

"Suitable or proper in the circumstances."

She's running for office (in all likelihood). She is a brilliant woman. But they're going to make this about her physical attributes, thereby reducing her to a caricature.

I used appropriate/inappropriate to avoid something along the lines of "Stay classy, GOP! Way to win women!"

You mean as the Democrats have "stayed classy" when it comes to Sarah Palin?

Yes, and all Tea Partiers are racists. Wanna quit with the "you're all the same" bullshit brush?
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0Q4r5OA09g]Sandra Bernhard Wishes Sarah Palin Would Be Gang-Raped By Her Black Brothers in Manhattan. - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGhoYT84Jeg]Failed Comedian Sandra Bernhard Attacks Sarah Palin - YouTube[/ame]
 

This is America; you can do whatever you want. Are they in good taste? Absolutely not. Let the cons drool over them, and let main stream Americans understand just how vile these people are. Hillary should pass these out at all her fundraisers. This just makes me want to donate to her campaign that much more. In time.....
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is absolutely appropriate. This is nothing compared to how people with left-wing political views made fun of and attacked Sarah Palin's grandchild with Down's Syndrome.

You know, I have one question. Is there anyone in the Democrat party running for president that's not an ancient 1960's radical extremist? Seriously, outside of Wendy Davis who is running for governor of Texas, the Democrats have no young and upcoming superstars, nothing but a bunch of old 60's radicals who are a step away from retirement homes.

Cory Booker

Julian Castro

Martin O'Malley

Amy Klobuchar

Elizabeth Warner

Off the top of my head.

And yours?

Cory Booker might have some potential, but given the fact that the polls have tightened in his bid for the deeply blue state of NJ's Senate seat against an underfunded nobody from the Republican Party, that is most interesting to say the least.

Julian Castro, I have seen him speak, he has nowhere near the magnetism or aura about him like Obama...not even close.

The rest of the people you mentioned, never heard of them.


As for the ones on the Republican side, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Justin Amash, just to name a few...almost everyone has heard of them.

The Democrat Party is a party of aging radicals. Seriously, Wendy Davis is the only rising star in the Democrat Party that doesn't need a pair of dentures and Depends.

mack20 said:
I wouldn't stress about it too much. I'm starting to think that that's Locke's go-to whine whenever a liberal or possibly liberal woman is being discussed. He essentially accused me of the same type of thing because I had taken issue with another poster constantly calling a Park Ranger a bitch.

He also does not seem to be aware that Trig is Sarah Palin's son, not her grandson.

I would rather be wrong in stating Trig is Sarah Palin's grandson, when yes, he is her son. I'd rather be wrong on that issue than to be wrong like you. Wrong like you in that you clearly support attacking the children of candidates you don't like. You could've easily replied to me by saying, you agree, attacks on politicians are wrong, and then mentioned my error on Trig. But no, no condemnation of attacking children of politicians you don't like, your silence is your support of it.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top