XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,572
- 10,497
- 435
Post #730.How so? We saw a significant decline in such incidents without any lowering of the age to buy long guns.
Your inability to use reasoning isn't my problem.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Post #730.How so? We saw a significant decline in such incidents without any lowering of the age to buy long guns.
Still projecting.I don't expect you to be convinced of my case. You've demonstrated that you throw a hissy-fit temper tantrum about anything being done to your precious guns.
What I do have is a bipartisan solution that both sides actually agreed to. Naturally you just want to throw a hissy-fit about that as well.
There is no reasoning to your argument. "Might" and "Maybe" is not reasoning.You need to spend some time understanding how to use reasoning for your arguments.
Go cry at Florida then.Still projecting.
There are not facts or data to suggest raising the age is going to make any difference at all.
I bipartisan "Solution" as opposed to "show" would be to secure our schools and provide an immediate armed response.
Once again, there was no lowering of the age. What did take place over that time period was securing and hardening of facilities and a dramatic increase in armed security.Post #730.
Your inability to use reasoning isn't my problem.
You probably shouldn't describe reasoning when you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.There is no reasoning to your argument. "Might" and "Maybe" is not reasoning.
Florida isn't here making inane arguments, you are.Go cry at Florida then.
Your inability to understand isn't my problem.Once again, there was no lowering of the age. What did take place over that time period was securing and hardening of facilities and a dramatic increase in armed security.
What you consider inane isn't my problem.Florida isn't here making inane arguments, you are.
I'm the one person here who actually knows what they are talking about and has the facts to support my case.You probably shouldn't describe reasoning when you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
I believe that you believe that.I'm the one person here who actually knows what they are talking about and has the facts to support my case.
The reprehensible right doesn't care about addressing gun crime and violence, instead they contrive ridiculous, idiotic non-solutions like arming teachers.All "gun control" proposals are chip-away efforts to ban and confiscate and if you deny it, you are a fucking liar. PERIOD.
You are now just making things up because there simply are no facts or evidence of any kind to support your position.Your inability to understand isn't my problem.
You're looking for a cause/effect relationship when it's impossible to determine what it is from the data we have.
You mean like the "fact" that the schools were hardened in the data you're using?You are now just making things up because there simply are no facts or evidence of any kind to support your position.
Securing facilities and providing an immediate armed response are the two things we have any data supporting as positive measures to reduce these incidents.The reprehensible right doesn't care about addressing gun crime and violence, instead they contrive ridiculous, idiotic non-solutions like arming teachers.
School campuses all over the country were hardened and secured following Columbine and thousands of districts nationwide started providing or increased armed security as a result of the recommendations coming out after that shooting.You mean like the "fact" that the schools were hardened in the data you're using?
Oh right. That was just made up.
Columbine happened in 1999, you moron.School campuses all over the country were hardened and secured following Columbine and thousands of districts nationwide started providing or increased armed security as a result of the recommendations coming out after that shooting.
Are you really so ignorant as to not realize it takes time for evaluations to be made and programs to then be implemented?Columbine happened in 1999, you moron.
The data set you're using went from 2009 to 2019 and it said absolutely nothing about additional security. You're just making shit up.
You're so bad at this.
The reprehensible right doesn't care about addressing gun crime and violence, instead they contrive ridiculous, idiotic non-solutions like arming teachers.
Oh yea? How long did it take for evaluations to be made and then programs to then be implemented? 10 years? Based on nothing but your stupid ass feelings?Are you really so ignorant as to not realize it takes time for evaluations to be made and programs to then be implemented?