Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is NewweekQuote him.
www.newsweek.com
Fragile? Was FDR fragile when he oversaw America's leadership during WWII?
please
Why would he. He wasn't a Roman Catholic. He was a WASP.FDR didn’t need the Easter Bunny to show him where to go.
Here is Newweek
Donald Trump says Joe Biden "not even close" to being too old for president
The former president defended the White House incumbent against concerns about his advanced age.
www.newsweek.com
How many times do you need to be told to stay of the leftist kook sites.SOS, different day. The Murdoc lie Machine has to try and take the heat off their convict candidate.
"The Wall Street Journal published a seemingly damning story on Tuesday night about President Joe Biden’s diminishing mental acuity, with a headline guaranteed to cause panic: “Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Slipping.”
With a header like that, you might think the Journal really has the goods on Biden this time, with quotes from dozens of sources within the White House, likely speaking anonymously for fear of appearing to betray their boss with the damaging confessions about how he, in fact, is too old and unfit to be president for another term.
But no. Who does the Journal have? Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson. And former Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. And Idaho Sen. James Risch, who is—as you might have guessed—a Republican.
Contrary to its terrifying headline, what the Journal has is a blatant hit piece from Republicans who are shamelessly pushing the Republican talking point that Biden—who is only four years older than Donald Trump—is oh so very, very old. Concerningly so.
Let’s take a closer look at this smear masquerading as reporting.
Wall Street Journal runs stunning hit piece on Biden
The Wall Street Journal published a seemingly damning story on Tuesday night about President Joe Biden’s diminishing mental acuity, with a headline guaranteed to cause panic: “Behind Closed Doors,www.dailykos.com
Apples and hand grenades.Fragile? Was FDR fragile when he oversaw America's leadership during WWII?
please
It wasn't FDR's physical issues that were concerning at the end. There were controversies over whether his physical illness "impaired his judgment and performance at a crucial moment during the Yalta Conference."Apples and hand grenades.
“Fragile” doesn’t necessarily refer just to physical limitations.
Because you keep falling for the lesser-of-two-evils conceit. That's how.He's just too old to be President. You can't have someone in there who is that fragile.
And then there's the alternative.
How the fuck did we get here? Our system needs to be fixed before it's too late.
I would love is we put an age max of 75 for public officials.
But we have what we have.
A decent old man who forgets things sometimes, or a psychotic old man who is bent on revenge on the 51% of the country that never liked him.
This should be an easy one.
Because you keep falling for the lesser-of-two-evils conceit. That's why
The alternative had a very successful presidency until he was blind sided by Covid. Bio-weapons will fuck things up.He's just too old to be President. You can't have someone in there who is that fragile.
And then there's the alternative.
How the fuck did we get here? Our system needs to be fixed before it's too late.
I read Memorandom, daily. There have been several articles discussing this. The general feeling is Trump's original idea of attacking Biden as "too old" has failed as he too is a senior citizen by any accounting whatsoever, and the attacks based on age are found insulting to anyone over 65, a demographic thought to favor traditional republican philosophy, but not necessarily the new crude trumpian attacks of the trump and the radical right. The problem with the method of attack is that the over 65 demographic is more likely to actually vote. So, it is thought you will see far less attacks based on age, though many followers may be slow to pick up and change, so as not to be as damaging to Trump campaign."Donald Trump Says Joe Biden 'Not Even Close' to Being Too Old for President"
Donald Trump says Joe Biden "not even close" to being too old for president
The former president defended the White House incumbent against concerns about his advanced age.
And no one bats an eye. Business as usual in duopoly-land.Oh boy, another "my candidate is not as demented as yours" thread.
That is like 3 so far today.
What fun.
Um, how many of those fantasies have you proven in court?Yes corn pops is psychotic, demented, and has taken showers with his underage daughter while also sticking his fingers in a white house aide. There is nothing decent about that.
He's just too old to be President. You can't have someone in there who is that fragile.
And then there's the alternative.
How the fuck did we get here? Our system needs to be fixed before it's too late.
You're on a far right MAGA kook site right now.How many times do you need to be told to stay of the leftist kook sites.
We got here because most Americans are stupid and lazy. They won't take it upon themselves to read and research and learn. In 2020 the Dems had a fantastic candidate in Steve Bullock, Dem governor of a red state, Montana.
He has great physical presence, demeanor, well-spoken and would have made Trump shit his diaper in a debate. Or at least fart loudly. But Bullock didn't get very far because he didn't have high name recognition, because people are lazy and refuse to research and learn.
I've long observed that Trump will say things that he'll pull back on if they fail to take root, while all of a sudden something he says gets a wild response and he runs with it.I read Memorandom, daily. There have been several articles discussing this. The general feeling is Trump's original idea of attacking Biden as "too old" has failed as he too is a senior citizen by any accounting whatsoever, and the attacks based on age are found insulting to anyone over 65, a demographic thought to favor traditional republican philosophy, but not necessarily the new crude trumpian attacks of the trump and the radical right. The problem with the method of attack is that the over 65 demographic is more likely to actually vote. So, it is thought you will see far less attacks based on age, though many followers may be slow to pick up and change, so as not to be as damaging to Trump campaign.
You are correct. I do not want him as president, but whoever noticed and pointed it out to him, in a way, he understood, deserves a raise, just as it is sound political insight. No need to needlessly close the small tent party further, by alienating people over 65.I've long observed that Trump will say things that he'll pull back on if they fail to take root, while all of a sudden something he says gets a wild response and he runs with it.
