Bernie wants a $7.20 minimum wage

[The Original Tree]

War spend is an issue but now we are pot committed because of Bush and I did not vote for him. I was first eligible to vote in 2000 and voted for Gore. Actually if Clinton had the balls to kill Bin Laden then 9/11 tragedy likely doesn’t happen. Shame on Clinton and shame on Bush. Obama inherited a shit storm and Trump did as well. Endless wars are terrible. Tulsi Gabbard is right and her party buried her.

I initially supported Gabbard. I'd love to see Sanders pick her as his VP. We are NOT committed to the wars. Your argument boils down to the idea that we can not afford to see that people can get health care when needed because we have to waste trillions on never ending wars.

No, I totally reject that.

Wars will never end. The Book of Revelations, Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel all tell you that as we approach the time of AntiChrist that there will be wars and rumors of wars.

All your efforts to stop these wars are silly.

The Battle of Armageddon will occur and nothing you can do to stop it. Socialism-Globalism will only accelerate things and will make matters worse.

Things like Freedom of Religion. Free Speech, Freedom of thought and action, and standing up for what is good and wholesome and proper may delay Judgement.

Global Warming is a joke. The Judgments Coming at the end times are 1,000 times worse than anything in these Global Warming Nuts imaginations. You aren't stopping that either.

The Earth and all the wicked works in it, and every building made by man will be destroyed at the end of the age, and the Earth will be burned by fire, and remade in to a garden of Eden for The People of God to live upon.

The only things you can do that will last forever are the things you do in Spirit and the choice you make on where to spend eternity.

Enslaving people with Socialism only hastens The End of The Age.

If your argument is that we will always be war mongers I am fine with hastening the end of the age.

It's true. As the end of the age approaches, people will become violent, pathological liars, abusers of others, involved in sexual immorality, and along with pestilences and natural disasters like Earthquakes, Volcanoes, Crazy Weather will be Wars and Rumors of Wars.

Things are going to get worse, and NOTHING Man does, even if you confiscated every penny and enslave The Whole World is going to stop it.

Only The Return of The Prince of Peace will stop it.

It's then that The World will turn their Swords in to Plowshares after Yeshua ends The Battle of Armageddon Himself and rules from The Throne of David.

You say I want to hasten that. Are you saying that is a bad thing? Are you saying that actions I take will change what is already decided? The Bible is dependent on my not wanting people to not be able to access medical care when they need it?

No one wants to deny people medical care.

No one has ever been denied medical care in The US.

But we should not allow The Government to take over 1\6th of The Economy to provide Health Insurance for everyone, just like we should not be paying for Life Insurance, or Car Insurance, or Home Insurance for everyone.

In fact, every time The Government has gotten involved in something, they have ruined it, usually.

You also cannot encourage Lawlessness. You cannot give people incentives to break the law, and you should not allow illegals health insurance paid for by The Taxpayer.

America is the Most Charitable Nation on Earth, but we should not be smashing our piggy banks and embarking on a mission to Bankrupt America, and liquidate what is left of our wealth in order to embrace a Communist-Globalist-Socialist Tyranny.

There is nothing from stopping individuals from doing good deeds with their own money, so if you want to do good, do good out of your own pocket and do not rob your neighbor to do those things you would like to do, and should do out of your own pocket.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

So easily duped you are.

Did Sanders Propose Raising Taxes to 52% on Incomes Over $29,000?

The thing is, you knew this had been debunked but still felt like you have to post it.

But lets argue it was true. It's a heck of a deal. Minimum wage now is $7.25. So in this scenario people would get $7.20 but also get health care. That's a really good deal.

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

No, they don't save money. They cost trillions to everyone.

 

[pknopp]

So easily duped you are.

Did Sanders Propose Raising Taxes to 52% on Incomes Over $29,000?

The thing is, you knew this had been debunked but still felt like you have to post it.

But lets argue it was true. It's a heck of a deal. Minimum wage now is $7.25. So in this scenario people would get $7.20 but also get health care. That's a really good deal.

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

It's how it works in other first world countries. I've noted over and over the argument is that the "greatest" country in the world is unable to do what ever other first world country has been able to do.

 

[pknopp]

I initially supported Gabbard. I'd love to see Sanders pick her as his VP. We are NOT committed to the wars. Your argument boils down to the idea that we can not afford to see that people can get health care when needed because we have to waste trillions on never ending wars.

No, I totally reject that.

Wars will never end. The Book of Revelations, Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel all tell you that as we approach the time of AntiChrist that there will be wars and rumors of wars.

All your efforts to stop these wars are silly.

The Battle of Armageddon will occur and nothing you can do to stop it. Socialism-Globalism will only accelerate things and will make matters worse.

Things like Freedom of Religion. Free Speech, Freedom of thought and action, and standing up for what is good and wholesome and proper may delay Judgement.

Global Warming is a joke. The Judgments Coming at the end times are 1,000 times worse than anything in these Global Warming Nuts imaginations. You aren't stopping that either.

The Earth and all the wicked works in it, and every building made by man will be destroyed at the end of the age, and the Earth will be burned by fire, and remade in to a garden of Eden for The People of God to live upon.

The only things you can do that will last forever are the things you do in Spirit and the choice you make on where to spend eternity.

Enslaving people with Socialism only hastens The End of The Age.

If your argument is that we will always be war mongers I am fine with hastening the end of the age.

It's true. As the end of the age approaches, people will become violent, pathological liars, abusers of others, involved in sexual immorality, and along with pestilences and natural disasters like Earthquakes, Volcanoes, Crazy Weather will be Wars and Rumors of Wars.

Things are going to get worse, and NOTHING Man does, even if you confiscated every penny and enslave The Whole World is going to stop it.

Only The Return of The Prince of Peace will stop it.

It's then that The World will turn their Swords in to Plowshares after Yeshua ends The Battle of Armageddon Himself and rules from The Throne of David.

You say I want to hasten that. Are you saying that is a bad thing? Are you saying that actions I take will change what is already decided? The Bible is dependent on my not wanting people to not be able to access medical care when they need it?

No one wants to deny people medical care.

No one has ever been denied medical care in The US.

Woman says her son couldn't afford his insulin – now he's dead

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Banks paid everything back and more and there is zero democratic about Socialism and Sanders is a communist anyway. You’re just making stuff up now. I work in the banking market and banks have repaid all their capital injections with interest and quicker than initially anticipated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...02fb50-572a-11ea-8753-73d96000faae_story.html

Bernie Sanders in 1972: 'I Don't Mind People ... Calling Me a Communist'

I explained how it was paid back. You refuse to acknowledge that.

It was paid back with debt and equity issuances aka the private sector. You don’t need to explain anything to me. Banks are vital to the US. They are our engine to economic success.

Right, you support bailing out the banks even though they failed which is how capitalism works but you say you support capitalism. You do not.

It wasnt capitalism that failed. It was easy financing and a bundle of lies. Wasn't capitalism. Once again, your inability to think critically has caused you to arrive at your mistaken drivel.

It was a quid pro quo. Socialism bailed the banks out.

Too big to fail. Yeah, we all heard shrub line up with the libs and bail out the banks. Just shows that socialists take on all stripes.

 

[pknopp]

I explained how it was paid back. You refuse to acknowledge that.

It was paid back with debt and equity issuances aka the private sector. You don’t need to explain anything to me. Banks are vital to the US. They are our engine to economic success.

Right, you support bailing out the banks even though they failed which is how capitalism works but you say you support capitalism. You do not.

It wasnt capitalism that failed. It was easy financing and a bundle of lies. Wasn't capitalism. Once again, your inability to think critically has caused you to arrive at your mistaken drivel.

It was a quid pro quo. Socialism bailed the banks out.

Too big to fail. Yeah, we all heard shrub line up with the libs and bail out the banks. Just shows that socialists take on all stripes.

That idea started in the Bush administration. It was Bush that bailed out the banks.

 

[Rigby5]

Banks paid everything back and more and there is zero democratic about Socialism and Sanders is a communist anyway. You’re just making stuff up now. I work in the banking market and banks have repaid all their capital injections with interest and quicker than initially anticipated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...02fb50-572a-11ea-8753-73d96000faae_story.html

Bernie Sanders in 1972: 'I Don't Mind People ... Calling Me a Communist'

I explained how it was paid back. You refuse to acknowledge that.

It was paid back with debt and equity issuances aka the private sector. You don’t need to explain anything to me. Banks are vital to the US. They are our engine to economic success.

Right, you support bailing out the banks even though they failed which is how capitalism works but you say you support capitalism. You do not.

It wasnt capitalism that failed. It was easy financing and a bundle of lies. Wasn't capitalism. Once again, your inability to think critically has caused you to arrive at your mistaken drivel.

It was a quid pro quo. Socialism bailed the banks out.

Exactly.
Everything good government does is always socialism, because it is not for profit.
In fact, banks could not exist without the socialism of the federal reserve, bailouts, protection, currency, etc.

 

[Ken Mac]

So easily duped you are.

Did Sanders Propose Raising Taxes to 52% on Incomes Over $29,000?

The thing is, you knew this had been debunked but still felt like you have to post it.

But lets argue it was true. It's a heck of a deal. Minimum wage now is $7.25. So in this scenario people would get $7.20 but also get health care. That's a really good deal.

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

Sad part is that you believe we can go down that path and not bankrupt our country.

 

[Ken Mac]

So easily duped you are.

Did Sanders Propose Raising Taxes to 52% on Incomes Over $29,000?

The thing is, you knew this had been debunked but still felt like you have to post it.

But lets argue it was true. It's a heck of a deal. Minimum wage now is $7.25. So in this scenario people would get $7.20 but also get health care. That's a really good deal.

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

It's how it works in other first world countries. I've noted over and over the argument is that the "greatest" country in the world is unable to do what ever other first world country has been able to do.

This says it all:

 

[pknopp]

So easily duped you are.

Did Sanders Propose Raising Taxes to 52% on Incomes Over $29,000?

The thing is, you knew this had been debunked but still felt like you have to post it.

But lets argue it was true. It's a heck of a deal. Minimum wage now is $7.25. So in this scenario people would get $7.20 but also get health care. That's a really good deal.

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

Sad part is that you believe we can go down that path and not bankrupt our country.

We are 23 trillion in debt with no end in sight. Odd how it is that the endless wars are not going bankrupt us but making sure everyone can afford medical care will.

 

[jknowgood]

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Let's say that is true. That is not the claim being made. We give the super rich billions of dollars from the Fed. That should indeed be shared.

You could take all of the wealthy people' money and it still wouldn't be enough.

You can address what I said or not. Why is it that only a few should benefit from the creation of billions and billions when they do nothing to get that wealth?

You cannot be that stupid? The rich do nothing? You're clueless.

For the billions and billions the Fed creates out of nothing?

What does the goverment creat?

 

[Ken Mac]

You want to hear the story on Switzerland? They don't have a minimum wage law. They allow some bargaining through a sort of union program in some industries.

 

[pknopp]

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

It's how it works in other first world countries. I've noted over and over the argument is that the "greatest" country in the world is unable to do what ever other first world country has been able to do.

This says it all:

Do you really believe that people in Switzerland are living on $1700 a year?

 

[Ken Mac]

According to your article, assuming it is true because Snopes is a far left source:

BUTTIGIEG: [Sanders] was a congressman at the time. And the qualities I admired then are qualities I still respect a great deal. I never said that I agree with every part of his policy views, then or now. But I appreciate that at least he’s straightforward and honest about them. He’s honest about the fact that taxes will go up on anybody making more than $29,000 to fund his health care plan, although, again, a little bit vague about how the rest of that gets …

SANDERS: You’re not being honest. Premiums would be eliminated.

BUTTIGIEG: But you’re still raising those taxes. And when you do it…

SANDERS: But we’re saving people money because they don’t pay any premiums, out-of-pocket expenses, co-payments, or deductibles. They’re going to be much better off. [applause]

BUTTIGIEG: But where is — where is the other $25 trillion supposed to come from? At a certain point, you’ve got to do the math.

SANDERS: Well, we got it all up there on the internet. It’s a payroll tax — a payroll tax…

[crosstalk]

BUTTIGIEG: Well, no, but even after the payroll tax, you still have a hole.

[crosstalk]

SANDERS: Because we have a wealth tax. Elizabeth [Warren] has a good one. Ours is a little bit tougher on Mr. Bloomberg than hers. We’re going to raise it in a progressive way, which deals with income and wealth inequality, and makes certain, finally, that health care in this country is a human right, not a privilege.

So Sanders is going to pay for all this from the "rich"? The combined wealth of Billionaires is only $2.4 trillion and could only fund the US federal government about half a year.

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

Sad part is that you believe we can go down that path and not bankrupt our country.

We are 23 trillion in debt with no end in sight. Odd how it is that the endless wars are not going bankrupt us but making sure everyone can afford medical care will.

I think the endless wars need to end too! but they are a drop in the bucket compared to Bernie's total plan and the costs associated with it. Medicare for all is way, way more than the war dollars we spend.

 

[pknopp]

Let's say that is true. That is not the claim being made. We give the super rich billions of dollars from the Fed. That should indeed be shared.

You could take all of the wealthy people' money and it still wouldn't be enough.

You can address what I said or not. Why is it that only a few should benefit from the creation of billions and billions when they do nothing to get that wealth?

You cannot be that stupid? The rich do nothing? You're clueless.

For the billions and billions the Fed creates out of nothing?

What does the goverment creat?

Billions and billions it would seem.

 

[Ken Mac]

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

It's how it works in other first world countries. I've noted over and over the argument is that the "greatest" country in the world is unable to do what ever other first world country has been able to do.

This says it all:

Do you really believe that people in Switzerland are living on $1700 a year?

where do you get that data? That's not shown on that graph

 

[Ken Mac]

That's what they pay in taxes. You are reading the graph incorrectly. The orange bar is take home pay.

 

[pknopp]

Sanders and The Democrats are out to Bankrupt America.

You cannot extract $200 Trillion of Government Spending out of just a $20 Trillion Economy.

Not only that, but the entire wealth of the people of the United states combined is < 100T


so even taking all of the wealth doesn't work either.

t'he math doesn't fucking work.

Sanders continually explains that his programs save money and therefore cost nothing more.
For example, Medicare for all would cost less than half what we pay now in private health insurance.

Sad part is that you believe we can go down that path and not bankrupt our country.

We are 23 trillion in debt with no end in sight. Odd how it is that the endless wars are not going bankrupt us but making sure everyone can afford medical care will.

I think the endless wars need to end too! but they are a drop in the bucket compared to Bernie's total plan and the costs associated with it. Medicare for all is way, way more than the war dollars we spend.

Most of which we are already spending. You act like the billions being spent on health care now is just going to stop. It is not.

 

[Lakhota]

Let's say that is true. That is not the claim being made. We give the super rich billions of dollars from the Fed. That should indeed be shared.

You could take all of the wealthy people' money and it still wouldn't be enough.

You can address what I said or not. Why is it that only a few should benefit from the creation of billions and billions when they do nothing to get that wealth?

You cannot be that stupid? The rich do nothing? You're clueless.

For the billions and billions the Fed creates out of nothing?

What does the goverment creat?

Governments create the environment for economic growth - among many other things..

• A Day in the Life Without Government | Psychology Today
  https://www.psychologytoday.com / us / blog / turning-straw-gold / 201606 / day-in-the-life-without-... - 190k - similar pages
  Jun 26, 2016 ... We need government and governmentneeds us. This "Day in the Life" hypothetical illustrates why.
• What If There Were No Government? - Investopedia
  https://www.investopedia.com / financial-edge / 0811 / what-if-there-were-no-go... - 137k -similar pages
  Jun 25, 2019 ... Admittedly it is an outlandish scenario, but what would life in the United States look like? (For more read Why You Don't Want A Government ...
• Without government to enforce laws, would life be, as Thomas ...
  https://www.researchgate.net / post / Without_government_to_en... - similar pages
  Even with governments life can be nasty etc, but without governments it would probably be even less predictable. A working infrastructure doesn't grow ...
• What would the world be like without government? - Quora
  https://www.quora.com/What-would-the-world-be-like-without-government - 10 hours ago -similar pages
  Originally Answered: What would it be like to live in a nation without agovernment? Not what I would wish for. Who makes the rules, controls resources, lets you ...

 

[Ken Mac]

Besides that small country (Switzerland is the size of Virginia), Our take home pay kicks the ass out of any other country. I give Denmark a nod for their health care system, but they are the size of Maryland. I don't see the problem with saying we have the greatest fucking country in the world. It's not even close.
Everyone just seems to not want to work and make something for and of themselves.

Give me free shit! Hell yeah!