Best Guess who wrote NYT Op-Ed

[caddo kid]

Agree and this POS going into our SC must be stopped

Oh! You don't like Kavanaugh? Good! I don't either.

LOL that's one thing we can agree on Who knows might be another in a year or 2

I want a strict Constitutionalist, what do you want?

If you honestly wanted that you would stop saying how much you hate socialism.

Our constitution requires that America be a mixture of both capitalism and socialism.

You would also stop advocating a so called "free market" as the solution for every economic situation. Our constitution also doesn't like your so called free market. Our constitution requires America to have properly regulated capitalism.

You don't want a strict constitutionalist. You don't know what's in that document beyond the second amendment.

You need a necktie party, traitor. People with 2nd amendment rights were made for people like your sorry ass. You go ahead and ponder that a minute.

I'm from America, boy.

NOT cool

 

[Kondor3]

Maybe just a New York Times publicity stunt?

Delusional Queen-of-Denial stuff there, but, OK, it's another option...

 

[ColonelAngus]

I have an anonymous Op-Ed myself:

The Dems are pussies.

-Anonymous

 

[Crixus]

The NY Times has less credibility than The Enquirer. That Op Ed could have been written by literally ANYONE who can string sentences together. Such as any member of the AP, the White House Press Corp, SNL or late night TV writers, Madcow, Chris Todd, etc etc...

Yes, EXCEPT the NYT rarely runs an anonymous op ed. They interviewed the person who brought them the letter quite carefully, they know the person, and after much discussion about breaking their policy, they decided that the content was important enough for the American people to know that they published it without the contributor's name.

Those reporter types can smell a rat a mile away. They would not have published it unless they had good reason to believe it was really by a senior official in the Trump administration.

Since they can smell a rat, are they then blatantly lying when they have to retract stories ? I’m talking CNN there. NYT and CNN have taken a real beating over this presidant. CNN has had to dump what, 3 news people for telling lies? And how many “anonymous sorces have actually panned out? That I can remember so far, none may be wrong, don’t know. Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Trump camp planted this story.

 

[iceberg]

So who do you think the secret patriot is in the White House who wrote the NYT's Op-Ed?

secret patriot? this is what you're trying to sell it as? the ONLY thing this is doing is legitimizing this behavior as acceptable and now that this is done, the right will follow suit in a "hold my beer" fashion to one up because none of us are stopping ourselves from being so childlike stupid in our collective behaviors. this is illustrated by your glorifying the actions and demonizing the ones they're directed against so you can FEEL like one side is patriotic and the other traitors.

to me - the traitors are the ones doing this to the country as a whole for their own selfish emotional state vs. stopping and asking our collective selves once again - what the FUCK are we doing to this country?

trump won. he took part in our founding process and won. the left needs a cup of shut the fuck up and deal with reality before we tear the country out from under us cause they're too fucking stupid to see what they're really doing.

unless of course they are really trying to kill the constitution. is that your goal johnlaw? rip up the constitution? cause that's exactly what this shit is doing.

congrats.

 

[iceberg]

I have an anonymous Op-Ed myself:

The Dems are pussies.

-Anonymous

at this point i'm pretty sure that's plagiarism.

 

[Crixus]

Personally I think it was Conway. I think her husband who dislikes Trump immensely finally broke through to her, and she is able to insulate herself by staying out front and spinning things to protect Trump in public.

I really don't know, but she was my first guess, too.

I thought the same, it she said on TV last night that “the leakers are never on the news”. If Trump diddnt have the story planted, I don’t think it was her.

 

[iceberg]

I don’t think they exist

legitimate answer. what if the left is just planting these stories in the paper to rile up trump? make him go look for what isn't there and not trust his own people?

 

[iceberg]

Don't have a clue but I love love the OP ED because the New York Times just fucking proved there really is a "Deep State".

It's not a conspiracy theory. It's real.

Wrong. Whoever wrote this is a Trump appointee and not some nameless bureaucrat. A person who knows the danger Trump poses to the nation.

been here going on 2 years now and none of the lefts fear mongering has some to pass.

NONE of it.

 

[caddo kid]

DOES NOT MATTER; as long as Trump is POTUS America & the planet are in immanent danger

25th Amendment is what Congress MUST immediately invoke

WTF is "immanent"?

BTW, try reading the 25th, or better yet, have a child read it to you. Congress does not "invoke" the 25th Amendment.

You can never pass up an opportunity to show what a clueless moron you are, can you?

The vice president and a majority of the cabinet could declare the president unable to “discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president disputes that determination, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate must vote to put the vice president in charge.

OK azzhole; I see you are not the brightest bulb jackwad

 

[amethyst]

Anonymous can be charged with treason if he incites action. Korea is watching.

 

[caddo kid]

Anonymous can be charged with treason if he incites action. Korea is watching.

Please , tell us how that works.

 

[iceberg]

DOES NOT MATTER; as long as Trump is POTUS America & the planet are in immanent danger

25th Amendment is what Congress MUST immediately invoke

WTF is "immanent"?

BTW, try reading the 25th, or better yet, have a child read it to you. Congress does not "invoke" the 25th Amendment.

You can never pass up an opportunity to show what a clueless moron you are, can you?

The vice president and a majority of the cabinet could declare the president unable to “discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president disputes that determination, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate must vote to put the vice president in charge.

OK azzhole; I see you are not the brightest bulb jackwad

so what you're saying it - the cabinet and vice president would invoke the 25th amendment, and the house/congress would come in later, ie - NOT invoking it on their own but being a part of said invoked process.

maybe get that child to read it to you next time.

 

[JLW]

So who do you think the secret patriot is in the White House who wrote the NYT's Op-Ed?

secret patriot? this is what you're trying to sell it as? the ONLY thing this is doing is legitimizing this behavior as acceptable and now that this is done, the right will follow suit in a "hold my beer" fashion to one up because none of us are stopping ourselves from being so childlike stupid in our collective behaviors. this is illustrated by your glorifying the actions and demonizing the ones they're directed against so you can FEEL like one side is patriotic and the other traitors.

to me - the traitors are the ones doing this to the country as a whole for their own selfish emotional state vs. stopping and asking our collective selves once again - what the FUCK are we doing to this country?

trump won. he took part in our founding process and won. the left needs a cup of shut the fuck up and deal with reality before we tear the country out from under us cause they're too fucking stupid to see what they're really doing.

unless of course they are really trying to kill the constitution. is that your goal johnlaw? rip up the constitution? cause that's exactly what this shit is doing.

congrats.

One can live in denial only so long before it all comes crashing down. Nearly all the books written about the Trump Administration up to and including Woodward's book and the recent Op-Ed all say the same thing. Trump is unhinged and of limited intelligence. He goes off the handle and is erratic. He loves dictators and has a disdain for democratic norms.

If Trump's aides listened to him with every childish and dangerous thought that flowed through Trump's mind we would be engaged in wars and every alliance would be shattered.

You say that these folks are a danger to the Republic, You couldn't be more wrong.

The danger is Trump who has diminished the presidency to lows never seen. Not even under Nixon. Trump has effectively castrated the Presidency by his behavior. His tweets are seen by many as no more than pathetic rantings.

I for one I'm glad that for the moment there are a few people in the house of horrors that is the Oval Office that have the nation's best interests at heart.

 

[jillian]

So who do you think the secret patriot is in the White House who wrote the NYT's Op-Ed?

They say based on the language, it might be mike pence or someone close to him. I can see where pence might want to step into the job

 

[iceberg]

So who do you think the secret patriot is in the White House who wrote the NYT's Op-Ed?

secret patriot? this is what you're trying to sell it as? the ONLY thing this is doing is legitimizing this behavior as acceptable and now that this is done, the right will follow suit in a "hold my beer" fashion to one up because none of us are stopping ourselves from being so childlike stupid in our collective behaviors. this is illustrated by your glorifying the actions and demonizing the ones they're directed against so you can FEEL like one side is patriotic and the other traitors.

to me - the traitors are the ones doing this to the country as a whole for their own selfish emotional state vs. stopping and asking our collective selves once again - what the FUCK are we doing to this country?

trump won. he took part in our founding process and won. the left needs a cup of shut the fuck up and deal with reality before we tear the country out from under us cause they're too fucking stupid to see what they're really doing.

unless of course they are really trying to kill the constitution. is that your goal johnlaw? rip up the constitution? cause that's exactly what this shit is doing.

congrats.

One can live in denial only so long before it all comes crashing down. Nearly all the books written about the Trump Administration up to and including Woodward's book and the recent Op-Ed all say the same thing. Trump is unhinged and of limited intelligence. He goes off the handle and is erratic. He loves dictators and has a disdain for democratic norms.

If Trump's aides listened to him with every childish and dangerous thought that flowed through Trump's mind we would be engaged with wars and every alliance would be shattered.

You say that these folks are a danger to the Republic, You couldn't be more wrong.

The danger is Trump who has diminished the presidency to lows never seen. Not even under Nixon. Trump has effectively castrated the Presidency by his behavior. His tweets are seen by many as no more than pathetic rantings.

I for one I'm glad that for the moment there are a few people in the house of horrors that is the Oval Office that have the nation's best interests at heart.

of course they do. and you know what, they're partially right. but you know what else, he still won. you may want to look at that "live in denial only so long before it all comes crashing down" cause nothing you can hope for will remove trump from office. the continued effort itself is an act against the constitution regardless of how you try to rephrase things so you can be right "in this case".

nixon? oh yea. he's the one who OFFERED to weaponize our government against itself and he was stopped dead cold and given the heave ho.

obama DID weaponize it and look what it's done. seems we were smarter as a group in the 70s than we are today.

wanna make any more clever analogies?

 

[jillian]

DOES NOT MATTER; as long as Trump is POTUS America & the planet are in immanent danger

25th Amendment is what Congress MUST immediately invoke

WTF is "immanent"?

BTW, try reading the 25th, or better yet, have a child read it to you. Congress does not "invoke" the 25th Amendment.

You can never pass up an opportunity to show what a clueless moron you are, can you?

The vice president and a majority of the cabinet could declare the president unable to “discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president disputes that determination, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate must vote to put the vice president in charge.

OK azzhole; I see you are not the brightest bulb jackwad

so what you're saying it - the cabinet and vice president would invoke the 25th amendment, and the house/congress would come in later, ie - NOT invoking it on their own but being a part of said invoked process.

maybe get that child to read it to you next time.

You need 2:3 of the Congress to act if a president were to object to being ousted under the 25th. There is no way that the GOP cultists are going to support such a move.

Perhaps you should get a school child to explain politics and basic math to you

 

[iceberg]

DOES NOT MATTER; as long as Trump is POTUS America & the planet are in immanent danger

25th Amendment is what Congress MUST immediately invoke

WTF is "immanent"?

BTW, try reading the 25th, or better yet, have a child read it to you. Congress does not "invoke" the 25th Amendment.

You can never pass up an opportunity to show what a clueless moron you are, can you?

The vice president and a majority of the cabinet could declare the president unable to “discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president disputes that determination, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate must vote to put the vice president in charge.

OK azzhole; I see you are not the brightest bulb jackwad

so what you're saying it - the cabinet and vice president would invoke the 25th amendment, and the house/congress would come in later, ie - NOT invoking it on their own but being a part of said invoked process.

maybe get that child to read it to you next time.

You need 2:3 of the Congress to act if a president were to object to being ousted under the 25th. There is no way that the GOP cultists are going to support such a move.

Perhaps you should get a school child to explain politics and basic math to you

i see comprehension fucks with you. the ONLY point i was making was that the VP and cabinet invoke that process.

the rest is just you being your usual bitch self.

 

[caddo kid]

DOES NOT MATTER; as long as Trump is POTUS America & the planet are in immanent danger

25th Amendment is what Congress MUST immediately invoke

WTF is "immanent"?

BTW, try reading the 25th, or better yet, have a child read it to you. Congress does not "invoke" the 25th Amendment.

You can never pass up an opportunity to show what a clueless moron you are, can you?

The vice president and a majority of the cabinet could declare the president unable to “discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president disputes that determination, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate must vote to put the vice president in charge.

OK azzhole; I see you are not the brightest bulb jackwad

so what you're saying it - the cabinet and vice president would invoke the 25th amendment, and the house/congress would come in later, ie - NOT invoking it on their own but being a part of said invoked process.

maybe get that child to read it to you next time.

You need 2:3 of the Congress to act if a president were to object to being ousted under the 25th. There is no way that the GOP cultists are going to support such a move.

Perhaps you should get a school child to explain politics and basic math to you

i see comprehension fucks with you. the ONLY point i was making was that the VP and cabinet invoke that process.

the rest is just you being your usual bitch self.

it sounds like the OP-ED is telling Americans that at least one official is thinking about the process; maybe others are too.

I can imagine that everyone within Trump's orbit is tiring of all of the 'baby sitting'

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So who do you think the secret patriot is in the White House who wrote the NYT's Op-Ed?

secret patriot? this is what you're trying to sell it as? the ONLY thing this is doing is legitimizing this behavior as acceptable and now that this is done, the right will follow suit in a "hold my beer" fashion to one up because none of us are stopping ourselves from being so childlike stupid in our collective behaviors. this is illustrated by your glorifying the actions and demonizing the ones they're directed against so you can FEEL like one side is patriotic and the other traitors.

to me - the traitors are the ones doing this to the country as a whole for their own selfish emotional state vs. stopping and asking our collective selves once again - what the FUCK are we doing to this country?

trump won. he took part in our founding process and won. the left needs a cup of shut the fuck up and deal with reality before we tear the country out from under us cause they're too fucking stupid to see what they're really doing.

unless of course they are really trying to kill the constitution. is that your goal johnlaw? rip up the constitution? cause that's exactly what this shit is doing.

congrats.

One can live in denial only so long before it all comes crashing down. Nearly all the books written about the Trump Administration up to and including Woodward's book and the recent Op-Ed all say the same thing. Trump is unhinged and of limited intelligence. He goes off the handle and is erratic. He loves dictators and has a disdain for democratic norms.

If Trump's aides listened to him with every childish and dangerous thought that flowed through Trump's mind we would be engaged with wars and every alliance would be shattered.

You say that these folks are a danger to the Republic, You couldn't be more wrong.

The danger is Trump who has diminished the presidency to lows never seen. Not even under Nixon. Trump has effectively castrated the Presidency by his behavior. His tweets are seen by many as no more than pathetic rantings.

I for one I'm glad that for the moment there are a few people in the house of horrors that is the Oval Office that have the nation's best interests at heart.

of course they do. and you know what, they're partially right. but you know what else, he still won. you may want to look at that "live in denial only so long before it all comes crashing down" cause nothing you can hope for will remove trump from office. the continued effort itself is an act against the constitution regardless of how you try to rephrase things so you can be right "in this case".

nixon? oh yea. he's the one who OFFERED to weaponize our government against itself and he was stopped dead cold and given the heave ho.

obama DID weaponize it and look what it's done. seems we were smarter as a group in the 70s than we are today.

wanna make any more clever analogies?

One of the things you seem to miss is that members of the Fed Govt, to include the White House staff take an oath of office to support and defend the constitution, not the man sitting in the Oval Office.

Their obligation is to the Constitution, not the president.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com