Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a peer reviewed study, not the typical kookoo for cocoa puffs blog post. You may find it enlightening, particularly the data sourced on vaccine related injuries.
RETRACTED: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdr…www.sciencedirect.com
You are correct on the animal to human transmission. There are at least 5 known domestic animal vectors of Covid-19, and that was as of mid-2021.
From this publications own web page:
Every year, we accept and publish more than 470,000 journal articles
Meaning that they publish EVERYTHING...they don't practice any discrimination or require validity of any paper.
In the paper you linked to me I noticed several errors that should never appear in a serious paper. Even the paper you linked to did admit that their sample size was too small for any valid correlation to be made.
Not suggesting that you aren't trying to get at the truth...but this is where long term understanding of where the real resources are at is crucial. Try science dot org for a good publication that's a LOT more discriminatory in what it publishes...and when it deviates from that discrimination the author's and editors ALL say something about it. (They have had a few minor lapses in judgement)
Just saying that the VAERS system is not usable at this time. It's a starting point but not an ending point in any medical research paper as the author should have noted but ignored completely to pronounce a massive and catastrophic problem with the vaccines. (There really isn't one)
From this publications own web page:
Every year, we accept and publish more than 470,000 journal articles
Meaning that they publish EVERYTHING...they don't practice any discrimination or require validity of any paper.
In the paper you linked to me I noticed several errors that should never appear in a serious paper. Even the paper you linked to did admit that their sample size was too small for any valid correlation to be made.
Not suggesting that you aren't trying to get at the truth...but this is where long term understanding of where the real resources are at is crucial. Try science dot org for a good publication that's a LOT more discriminatory in what it publishes...and when it deviates from that discrimination the author's and editors ALL say something about it. (They have had a few minor lapses in judgement)
Just saying that the VAERS system is not usable at this time. It's a starting point but not an ending point in any medical research paper as the author should have noted but ignored completely to pronounce a massive and catastrophic problem with the vaccines. (There really isn't one)
If you actually have the background you claim...then you know exactly how it was done AND you know exactly what I have said is true.You clearly have your mind made up (there is no way you read a 20+ page journal paper with 127 cited references in the time since I posted this link), so I am not going to waste time pointing you to the Phizer documents acknowledging VAED, or the research that points to an alarming problem with waning antibody titres resulting in buildup of ADE-inducing non-neutralizing antibodies ... suggesting the possibility of requiring continuous boosters for life to avoid potentially catastrophic VAED/VAERD.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm getting used to running into brick walls with people who talk like that. I have a background in microbiology, and 99% of the people who talk like experts on this issue would have to look up the terms microbiology and molecular biology to even know what they cover.
I copy pasted the number and quote.BTW, your claim about the number of articles published by this journal is completely off base. The article I cited was published in Toxicology Reports. You are referring to the general publisher, Elsevier, which publishes over 2,500 journals.
Toxicology Reports has a 94 member editorial board with members from 20 countries. Editorial Board - Toxicology Reports - Journal - Elsevier
Here are the publication guidelines: Guide for authors - Toxicology Reports - ISSN 2214-7500
Uh huh. Looks like Covid hits the most vulnerable the hardest. Is this news to you after two years?Looks like Covid isn't as bad as they have been claiming.
CDC Director Admits: Over 75% Of COVID Deaths In People With ‘At Least 4 Comorbidities’
Asked about a new study showing how successful vaccines have been in preventing serious illness and whether that should provoke rethinking about how to live with the virus in perpetuity, Walensky answered: “The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So, really, these are people who were unwell to begin with. And yes, really encouraging news in the context of Omicron; this means not only just to get your primary series but to get your booster series. And yes, we’re really encouraged by these results.”
Comorbidity does not mean near dead, dope. All of those people were alive before contracting Covid.many have been saying it all along. if you were damn near dead already, and got the rona.......they attributed the rona to your death.
well I stand corrected. no one has been saying that at all!!!!Comorbidity does not mean near dead, dope. All of those people were alive before contracting Covid.
This is a peer reviewed study, not the typical kookoo for cocoa puffs blog post. You may find it enlightening, particularly the data sourced on vaccine related injuries.
RETRACTED: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdr…
You are correct on the animal to human transmission. There are at least 5 known domestic animal vectors of Covid-19, and that was as of mid-2021.
Yep. Works great on the Trumptards.It's mind blowing they're unleashing this on children. Anything for control and GDP, and if you ask me, definitely to reduce populations.
We are vaccinating children so that Big Pharma can have a cash windfall of taxpayer money and pay a bunch of that to the media they prop up.This is a peer reviewed study, not the typical kookoo for cocoa puffs blog post. You may find it enlightening, particularly the data sourced on vaccine related injuries.
RETRACTED: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdr…
You are correct on the animal to human transmission. There are at least 5 known domestic animal vectors of Covid-19, and that was as of mid-2021.
Yep. Works great on the Trumptards.
Exactly. Trumptards are so confused, they’re dying far more often than anyone else.The vax works great on killing those not taking it?
Huh?
durpp durrppp dee dooExactly. Trumptards are so confused, they’re dying far more often than anyone else.
Even the "mild cases" of Covid are having long Covid issues.I tried to make this distinction from the beginning and It Took This Long For “officials” to get around to addressing this distinction and correcting the statistics.
Nonsense.Biden claims it is minorities, which is why he is giving them preference when it comes to treatments.
Minorities are overwhelmingly Democraps.
