Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the ONLY qualifier?...
peace...
it was the only qualifier when I married my wife.
What makes you think it would be any different with 2 men or 2 women who love each other?
Or two Sisters?... There are many Siblings who Care for Children together and Love each other and could Benefit from what Marriage Affords.
Why be Exclusionary when Expanding "Rights"?
peace...
it was the only qualifier when I married my wife.
What makes you think it would be any different with 2 men or 2 women who love each other?
Or two Sisters?... There are many Siblings who Care for Children together and Love each other and could Benefit from what Marriage Affords.
Why be Exclusionary when Expanding "Rights"?
peace...
I will admit....this argument ^^ is a difficult one to respond to..
Anyone?
Or two Sisters?... There are many Siblings who Care for Children together and Love each other and could Benefit from what Marriage Affords.
Why be Exclusionary when Expanding "Rights"?
peace...
I will admit....this argument ^^ is a difficult one to respond to..
Anyone?
It's an argument for taking the State out of marriage, that's for sure.
I will admit....this argument ^^ is a difficult one to respond to..
Anyone?
It's an argument for taking the State out of marriage, that's for sure.
If it's not about Sex than ANY number of people and genders, regardless of Realtion, should be Afforded this "Right"...
peace...
Nature design has dick to do with equal rights.
and edit to add - gay occurs in nature.
It's an argument for taking the State out of marriage, that's for sure.
If it's not about Sex than ANY number of people and genders, regardless of Realtion, should be Afforded this "Right"...
peace...
Even if it were about sex, Gays have it. But that's besides the point - it's not about sex because if it were, the couples that dont have it wouldn't be able to currently marry now, would they. Not a question.
Nature design has dick to do with equal rights.
and edit to add - gay occurs in nature.
Damn... Seems like we've been here before?...
A LOT of things happen in Nature...
Don't try to give False Validation to Human Choice by pointing at Animalistic Behaviors in Nature...
It's a door you don't want opened.
peace...
If it's not about Sex than ANY number of people and genders, regardless of Realtion, should be Afforded this "Right"...
peace...
Even if it were about sex, Gays have it. But that's besides the point - it's not about sex because if it were, the couples that dont have it wouldn't be able to currently marry now, would they. Not a question.
Marriage is a Reflection of our Natural Design and Equipment and our "very Existence"...
Homosexuals are Designed and Equipped to Couple with the Opposite Sex...
Why they don't is Irrelevant to Marriage.
They are not Denied Marriage, they are Denied the Ability to Redefine Marriage and call two Couplings Equal that are Physically and Factually NOT Equal.
This is about Validation and Acceptance, end of list.
peace...
Even if it were about sex, Gays have it. But that's besides the point - it's not about sex because if it were, the couples that dont have it wouldn't be able to currently marry now, would they. Not a question.
Marriage is a Reflection of our Natural Design and Equipment and our "very Existence"...
Homosexuals are Designed and Equipped to Couple with the Opposite Sex...
Why they don't is Irrelevant to Marriage.
They are not Denied Marriage, they are Denied the Ability to Redefine Marriage and call two Couplings Equal that are Physically and Factually NOT Equal.
This is about Validation and Acceptance, end of list.
peace...
I dont care what Marriage is, to you. You dont get to dictate that view unto me, and SHOULDNT be able to Legally, either. Liberty.
Marriage is a Reflection of our Natural Design and Equipment and our "very Existence"...
Homosexuals are Designed and Equipped to Couple with the Opposite Sex...
Why they don't is Irrelevant to Marriage.
They are not Denied Marriage, they are Denied the Ability to Redefine Marriage and call two Couplings Equal that are Physically and Factually NOT Equal.
This is about Validation and Acceptance, end of list.
peace...
I dont care what Marriage is, to you. You dont get to dictate that view unto me, and SHOULDNT be able to Legally, either. Liberty.
You can Wish in one Hand and Shit in the other all damned day, GT...
Homosexual Coupling is NOT Equal to how they are Designed by Nature...
They are Free to make that Choice, Act on Impulse, what the fuck ever else, but Expecting Society to Validate it as Equal to that which it Factually is not is where I draw the line.
Stop Expecting that everyone has to Agree with you on this, because they don't, and Nature isn't on your Side of the Argument to boot.
peace...
There is no law that says a gay person cannot be married, they just can't have the marriage of their choice, therefore the 14th Amendment doesn't apply.
The 14th states equal protection under the law. There is not equal protection when gays are not allowed to marry each other. It is gender discrimination.
They used to say it didn't apply to blacks either.
But they lied. gays can marry, there is no law that specially says homosexuals cannot marry, if it did that would be discrimination, so they 14th Amendment doesn't apply.
oh horse-hockey. That's a weakminded argument right there. "Oh, you can marry......OPPOSITE SEX!"
Fucking ducks the point.
You sodomites need to damn quit comparing your so called "struggle" to that of black people, use Jews for your example, but not us.
You sodomites need to damn quit comparing your so called "struggle" to that of black people, use Jews for your example, but not us.
There is no law that says a gay person cannot be married, they just can't have the marriage of their choice, therefore the 14th Amendment doesn't apply.
The 14th states equal protection under the law. There is not equal protection when gays are not allowed to marry each other. It is gender discrimination.
You as a lesbian are not forbidden to marry, you just cannot have a special marriage that suits your sexual lifestyle, but the right to marry is available to you so yes, you are equally protected under the damn law, end of story!
There is no law that says a gay person cannot be married, they just can't have the marriage of their choice, therefore the 14th Amendment doesn't apply.
The 14th states equal protection under the law. There is not equal protection when gays are not allowed to marry each other. It is gender discrimination.
You as a lesbian are not forbidden to marry, you just cannot have a special marriage that suits your sexual lifestyle, but the right to marry is available to you so yes, you are equally protected under the damn law, end of story!
But they lied. gays can marry, there is no law that specially says homosexuals cannot marry, if it did that would be discrimination, so they 14th Amendment doesn't apply.
oh horse-hockey. That's a weakminded argument right there. "Oh, you can marry......OPPOSITE SEX!"
Fucking ducks the point.
His point isn't ducking anything, its factually correct whether you like it or not, emotionalism is *NOT* an argument.
You sodomites need to damn quit comparing your so called "struggle" to that of black people, use Jews for your example, but not us.
You sodomites need to damn quit comparing your so called "struggle" to that of black people, use Jews for your example, but not us.
Shame on you and your "I got mine" attitude.
